💼 Careercow Keith Olbermann - A-logging commentator and writer with a massive hate-boner for Trump.

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Does Kieth have any family? I mean, if this guy were my uncle or something, and I saw his Twitter feed or his YouTube videos I would send police officers over to his place for a wellness check.
No that’s probably the best part is that he is single. By the way did anyone see his tweet replying to his reaction to salty cracker during the J6 hearing.
 
Trump posted this on Truth Social the other day:
1670290347810.png

In response, Keith wants himself to be blackbagged and carted off to Gitmo for advocating the terminating of the Constitution:
1670290284618.png
 
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
 
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
Trump announced he's running for 2024 almost a month ago man. Keith is still a reee'ing re though.
 
Trump announced he's running for 2024 almost a month ago man. Keith is still a reee'ing re though.

I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
 
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
People with TDS are going to exaggerate everything he says until the day he dies and the next Turbo Hitler comes along. They did the same thing with Nixon way back when; look at all of these old episodes from shows where they take potshots at Nixon, and they're doing the same thing with Trump now.
 
Wait until someone tells Keith that advocating for a revolution isn't a crime except under very narrowly defined circumstances. Neither is advocating for the abolishment of the Constitution. Shitposting on Truth by a man not currently in office or any governmental position, and currently someone who isn't even running for office, doesn't qualify, you shrieking hysteric.
You'd think people who scream THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT whenever it stands in their way would get a little less hysterical when someone else suggests ignoring it.
 
I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
I mean if Trump were to be jailed for a lot of the shit he's done (which he should) then Hillary and Biden would be publicly hung (which they should).
 
People with TDS are going to exaggerate everything he says until the day he dies and the next Turbo Hitler comes along. They did the same thing with Nixon way back when; look at all of these old episodes from shows where they take potshots at Nixon, and they're doing the same thing with Trump now.

The statement in question is pretty grammatically ambiguous, unless there's more to it than the posted picture. It could both be saying that a fake election could result in anarchy or should result in anarchy.

I'd ask if anyone sought clarification, but God knows people like Keith are too busy throwing a tantrum on Twitter.
 
You'd think people who scream THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT whenever it stands in their way would get a little less hysterical when someone else suggests ignoring it.
Don't make me tap the sign:
"The specific political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is that between friend and enemy."

Most of these Lefty faggots would drone "My body, my choice!" like brain-damaged macaws until they got their marching orders that if you didn't inject an experimental vaccine you were "killing grandma!" and deserved to die in a gutter with not a penny to your name. None of this shit is ever argued in good faith, especially among the click-bait political punditry class.
 
I stand corrected. My point still stands, though, and actually being a candidate gives him very strong speech protections. It's purest fantasy to think that he would face arrest for what he said, and not even rational to advocate he be hauled off to a stockade to face military tribunal. The military has no competence or authority to try speech cases involving civilians, and not even the most political military officers would want the case or agree to serve on that tribunal as judge, or jury. A few might be willing to serve as prosecutor, but not many. All of Trump's constitutional rights would still be in effect, and for a defense all he needs to do is point to the preamble to the Constitution. If the Framers could advocate for revolution in the nation's founding documents, he certainly can.
These are the same idiots who don't understand how difficult it is to be charged with inciting violence. I guarantee none of them have ever even heard of Brandenburg v. Ohio


Don't make me tap the sign:
"The specific political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is that between friend and enemy."

Most of these Lefty faggots would drone "My body, my choice!" like brain-damaged macaws until they got their marching orders that if you didn't inject an experimental vaccine you were "killing grandma!" and deserved to die in a gutter with not a penny to your name. None of this shit is ever argued in good faith, especially among the click-bait political punditry class.

It's a completely true but good luck ever using it in a debate with someone considering who said it.
 
And not just Keith but also Aaron Rupar, Donie O’Sullivan, and Matt Binder, and Taylor Lorenz completely scrubbed her account.

0D7582C3-E06E-4E8B-B46E-23DC4BA364C8.jpeg E207B4BE-D7CE-4D32-BBD1-D7CA6CBDA4AB.jpeg
5838B234-E592-445F-BE5E-5F8C91C56240.jpeg

Strangely, Mastodon’s Twitter account was also suspended.
8BFE6D1D-4C36-4C6F-AB73-546462A7E1F9.jpeg
EDIT: Apparently it’s because they all doxxed the location of Elon’s jet.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo