US Kamala Harris cites concerns about trans athletes in her book - The Trump campaign attacked Harris over her positions on transgender rights. She says they were misconstrued.

Article/Archive

1758333610014.webp

Harris writes that Trump's rhetoric on trans people was "putting them in peril.” | STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images

By Jeremy B. White
09/19/2025 06:06 PM EDT

Kamala Harris in her new memoir expresses reservations about transgender athletes competing on girls’ sports teams, echoing other national Democrats who have voiced a position long associated with conservatives.

President Donald Trump’s campaign hammered Harris over her positions on trans rights, releasing a now-famous ad with the tagline “Kamala is for they/them. I am for you” that Democrats across the country, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, acknowledged were effective. But Harris argues the Trump campaign misrepresented her positions, including on youth sports.

“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris writes. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

The passage makes Harris the latest national Democrat to question the fairness of allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls’ sports. Newsom broke with much of his party earlier this year by saying he felt their participation was “deeply unfair,” spurring both fury and praise from fellow Democrats and presaging a battle with the Trump administration over a transgender California athlete who competed in a state track-and-field championship.

Harris also defends telling the American Civil Liberties Union during her presidential primary campaign in 2019 that she supported providing gender transition treatment to people in prison and immigration detention, which also appeared in a Trump campaign ad. She writes that she supported what was “medically necessary,” adding that the law mandates medical care for prisoners.

A native of the liberal Bay Area who rose to power in San Francisco politics, Harris writes that she “has been an ally of the LGBTQ+ community for my entire life,” noting transgender people face a disproportionate risk of violence and deploring how Trump’s rhetoric “was painting a bull’s-eye on their backs and putting them in peril.”

“This is a community with which I have a deep connection,” Harris writes, adding, “There was no way I was going to go against my very nature and turn on transgender people.”

But while she dismisses the argument that Trump’s attack ads dealt her a “knockout punch,” she concedes that it was a “winning message” and says her campaign should have “given even more attention to how we might mitigate Trump’s attacks.”


Filed Under: California, Kamala Harris
 
hoping to convince them to vote for him and not notice that he didn't do anything to change the status quo in California for all the "concerns"
People from the other 49 states have heard him be called 'Gruesome Newsom', I really doubt anyone from one of the 49 other states would even entertain him for president. Blue cities might be the exception for that though.
 
People from the other 49 states have heard him be called 'Gruesome Newsom', I really doubt anyone from one of the 49 other states would even entertain him for president. Blue cities might be the exception for that though.
Reminds me of the election map: a few blue dots among a deep red country. Unfortunately those blue dots represent millions of voters
 
“With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”
Nobody is demonizing children. Not a single person.

College athletes are grown-ass adults and should be expected to know better, but nobody is saying kids are bad.

They're misguided by adults that would gladly give over to feelgood sentiments in favor of a fringe movement that up until recently, no one was allowed to question, but that isn't the fault of kid's when adults are recklessly enabling it.
 
“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris writes. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”
Wow, that was so boring I have yet to make it all the way through both sentences without nodding off. Trump's ghostwriters are much better. His books are fun.
 
Blue cities might be the exception for that though.
This is why everyone needs to start taking him seriously, right the fuck now.

This "eh, he's a California Kook" dismissal is EXACTLY how the left treated Trump....

He cleans up well enough and speaks well enough that although he's clearly an empty suit that espouses the most ruinous ideas the left can come up with that have literally burned down his own state? The public will vote for him in the millions because he looks so nice and clean and polite compared to those schoolyard bullies like Trump and Vance... who keep calling him names and making fun of the fact he cries when they do... that's not nice! Well, we'll show THEM!


Every single Karen on the planet will vote for him with that thousand watt smile and perfectly coiffed hair. He isn't an 80's/90's Democrat, but, he's the spitting image of one.

The issues won't matter to them. "Finally, we have that adult in the room! A man who cares! And he's not a geezer!" they'll say. "I'm with HIM!"

And their cuck husbands will follow.

And the moderate left who went for Trump or stayed home last year? They'll look a their neighbors enthusiastically turning out and say "well, I don't agree with his policy to stop the deportations and open the border...but.... I don't wanna get the stink-eye from all my neighbors and coworkers for 4 whole years....." and before you know it? We WILL have him up by five or ten in the Presidential polling for real, not just in push polls.

He is a serious threat and we need to acknowledge that.
 
People from the other 49 states have heard him be called 'Gruesome Newsom', I really doubt anyone from one of the 49 other states would even entertain him for president. Blue cities might be the exception for that though.
charismatic white guy with moderate talking points he'll never have to act on appeals to a lot of people. and there are enough neocon cucks that would vote for newsome to make the election a close call i reckon.

harris' initial momentum was decimated by her inability to speak.
 
“I agree with the concerns expressed by parents and players that we have to take into account biological factors such as muscle mass and unfair student athletic advantage when we determine who plays on which teams, especially in contact sports,” Harris writes. “With goodwill and common sense, I believe we can come up with ways to do this, without vilifying and demonizing children.”

🙄 This contradicts an Executive Order Biden signed on day one of his term in office, January 20, 2021. And if she disagreed with this, I don't remember hearing about it. Spoiler: she didn't disagree with it.

Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation

Section 1

.

Policy.

Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love. Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports. Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes.

Note that the term "locker room" and "school sports" are specifically used. In an executive order about "gender identity."

The fact that this nonsense was excreted by Biden et al didn't really surprise me. But it always blew my mind that Biden, or at any rate his minions, thought this of such critical importance it was done on his first day. Guess he couldn't wait.
 
The book comes out on the 23rd. Amazon is selling it for $20.98, list price is $30. Before long should be able to pick it up used for literally pennies. Lots of times on Amazon used books will sell for a penny, but shipping will run three or four bucks.
 
This is why everyone needs to start taking him seriously, right the fuck now.

This "eh, he's a California Kook" dismissal is EXACTLY how the left treated Trump....

He cleans up well enough and speaks well enough that although he's clearly an empty suit that espouses the most ruinous ideas the left can come up with that have literally burned down his own state? The public will vote for him in the millions because he looks so nice and clean and polite compared to those schoolyard bullies like Trump and Vance... who keep calling him names and making fun of the fact he cries when they do... that's not nice! Well, we'll show THEM!


Every single Karen on the planet will vote for him with that thousand watt smile and perfectly coiffed hair. He isn't an 80's/90's Democrat, but, he's the spitting image of one.

The issues won't matter to them. "Finally, we have that adult in the room! A man who cares! And he's not a geezer!" they'll say. "I'm with HIM!"

And their cuck husbands will follow.

And the moderate left who went for Trump or stayed home last year? They'll look a their neighbors enthusiastically turning out and say "well, I don't agree with his policy to stop the deportations and open the border...but.... I don't wanna get the stink-eye from all my neighbors and coworkers for 4 whole years....." and before you know it? We WILL have him up by five or ten in the Presidential polling for real, not just in push polls.

He is a serious threat and we need to acknowledge that.

The same reasoning is how the Canucks voted in a literal soyboy drama teacher as their Prime Minister too.
 
Again, remember, anytime a lefty agrees with the athletic muscle developement/bone density biological FACTS, it's simply to try to bully/logic normies and skeptics into being infavor of giving children hormone blockers. It's a fucked up and twisted game.
Also, what would be her solution? The male athletic division and the runts division (also male)?

This is so retarded. She would have maybe won the election if she had never spoken. Yet her video about funding surgeries for trans prisoners and her grating laugh cost her the elections
 
Also, what would be her solution? The male athletic division and the runts division (also male)?
I strongly suspect it'll come down to basically "eyeballing it" with a poorly reasoned medical rule tacked on for legitimacy.

Probably something like "if the athlete has been on hormone suppression for 12 months, they can participate in girls sports". Like sure, it's definitely true that reducing testosterone makes it harder to build muscle. And if you're a normal doughy computer nerd, you probably will lose muscle mass if your T drops. But we have no clue how that affects actively training athletes. The data on this is super sparse.

I'd be willing to at least listen to their dumb proposals (probably wouldn't agree with them, but I'd still listen) if they had some actual data, but they never do. Or they have the same reams of numerous-but-shitty studies that have been debunked over and over and over again over the years of GC people arguing with these morons.

But the pseudo-scientific rules they'll propose might be enough to persuade some normies and that worries me.

I think thankfully, the troons have burned whatever goodwill they had with the public long ago, so I think normies are less willing to take things on faith. Or I hope so.
 
They couldn't pass gay marriage in California, and they didn't even try democratic methods in Canada, and gay people are way less disturbing than trannies, so I don't see this issue being a tipping point across America. If there was mass support for trooning out boys and letting them brutalize girls in sports it would be enshrined in federal law by now.

If the Dems would drop tranny rights for sub-18s I don't think they would lose more voters than they gain.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo