🌟 Internet Famous Jirard Khalil / The Completionist / ThatOneVideoGamer - Obsessive Compulsive Autist involved in a $780k case of charity fraud

I also don't get why is Mutahar taken seriously also.
He accuse h3 also for charity dishonesty abc hipocrisy which turned out to be false.
He wants libs of tik tok deplatformed for reporting on a false news which us exactly what he did with h3.
Yet he can't stop his binge on moralfagging and rightchess indignation.
I feel the same way. In fact, I still remember the H3 accusation Mutahar was pushing where he had to make a video and apologize with his tail between his legs. Half expected this to end up the same way. But I guess it's a good thing the aussie did all the hard work before deciding to hitch his own clout chasing ass to the controversy.

It will be very entertaining to see how this proceeds and if legal action is taken.
 
Última edición:
Honestly, it would be so nice to see that smug reddit grin wiped off Mutahar's face with a lawsuit.
As funny as that may be, I'm sure that even Mutahar knows that Jirard is basically fucked if he tries to sue them. No reasonable* judge would hear their evidence and think that they were maliciously lying to harm Jirard.

*Clown world logic may fuck this, god knows we've seen this a dozen times before.
 
As funny as that may be, I'm sure that even Mutahar knows that Jirard is basically fucked if he tries to sue them. No reasonable* judge would hear their evidence and think that they were maliciously lying to harm Jirard.

*Clown world logic may fuck this, god knows we've seen this a dozen times before.
On top of that, I doubt that discovery would be very good for him.

And he’d probably lose huge money on a lawsuit. Suing is expensive, especially in defamation cases where it’s notoriously hard to win.
 
On top of that, I doubt that discovery would be very good for him.

And he’d probably lose huge money on a lawsuit. Suing is expensive, especially in defamation cases where it’s notoriously hard to win.
Given his sleazy fathers track record with getting lolsuits thrown out with prejudice, I don’t think it will go well for Jirard, and it would just open him up for a counter lawsuit.
 
Given his sleazy fathers track record with getting lolsuits thrown out with prejudice, I don’t think it will go well for Jirard, and it would just open him up for a counter lawsuit.
Lol, this is a good point. I bet these retards will sue.
 
Open Hand is restructuring
Indieland will continue but have no charity aspect
That's certainly a normal thing to do to a properly managed organization.

Also, the fat bearded bitch going "no stalker child" mode on explaining how a big chunk of change on the event and catering is retarded. He is certain that running a big golf tournament with big players and sponsors sure doesn't benefit him and his family networking or image. I think the main argument is that Jirard is a fake corporate shit that is aiming to get himself into a good situation with some other bigger corporate shits. The money hadn't moved and everyone was curious to why. You don't have to pocket the money to be a disingenuous manipulator in this situation. To say he or his family haven't personally benefitted is only true if you confide the conditions to a limited scope. Fat man got his time on the stage, improved his metrics, and was called a swell boy. Clearly, he didn't benefit, you guys.
 
That's certainly a normal thing to do to a properly managed organization.

Also, the fat bearded bitch going "no stalker child" mode on explaining how a big chunk of change on the event and catering is retarded. He is certain that running a big golf tournament with big players and sponsors sure doesn't benefit him and his family networking or image. I think the main argument is that Jirard is a fake corporate shit that is aiming to get himself into a good situation with some other bigger corporate shits. The money hadn't moved and everyone was curious to why. You don't have to pocket the money to be a disingenuous manipulator in this situation. To say he or his family haven't personally benefitted is only true if you confide the conditions to a limited scope. Fat man got his time on the stage, improved his metrics, and was called a swell boy. Clearly, he didn't benefit, you guys.
“I had nothing to do with the golf charity, other than be physically present, swing a few rounds, get photographed, and give a speech!”

Holy shit I watched this again and the dude is straight up gaslighting
 
Honestly I think the legal posturing towards the end is him trying to intimidate other content creators so they won't cover this, for fear of being sued. Karl and Mutahar probably already have lawyers and won't be intimidated (though they may still decide it's not worth it to keep following the story). I think Khalil's goal here is to intimidate smaller / less savvy youtubers so they'll shy away from any coverage at all. He wants to prevent a tawwxic gawssip train situation.
 
“I had nothing to do with the golf charity, other than be physically present, swing a few rounds, get photographed, and give a speech!”

Holy shit I watched this again and the dude is straight up gaslighting
But don't be saying he personally benefited. He probably had seven helpings at catering on other people's dime but he did not personally benefit. I hope he was reading a lawyer's script because it comes off as super entitled otherwise. I personally think it is better to be a retard with a spoon up your ass vs an out of touch prick with a silver spoon in your mouth.
 
Considering Mutahar is already making a response, my guess it that the contradictions are way too apparent for any of The Completionist's threats of a lawsuit to matter. It also helps that at the end of the day that The Completionist still commited charity fraud, no matter how much he tries to convince people watching otherwise.

Also, what kind of legal council does he have where they agree with him that he did nothing wrong? He must be gaslighting the audience into agreeing with him.
 
“I had nothing to do with the golf charity, other than be physically present, swing a few rounds, get photographed, and give a speech!”

Holy shit I watched this again and the dude is straight up gaslighting
"Your honor, it's not not defamation because it's false, it's not not defamation because I disagree."
 
I don't believe Jirad even for a second here with this apology/Response. It just reeks of a very corporate response with giving very vague responses and deflecting things like the golf stuff as clerical errors. He's definitely had lawyers have him read a script with how hollow it sounds. Overall, I wouldn't give Jirad the benefit of the doubt unless, An audit from the IRS happens and comes back empty Handed on any wrong doing. Regardless, I wouldn't advise anyone to donate anymore money to them. As, they can't even seem to manage a nonprofit organization very well.
 
No one has ever used a nonprofit to "strategically" move funds, pay for food and travel, and buy expensive name brand swag. This smells a lot like the line of lies Based Mama vomited out during kilroy. "Other big benefits waste money on lavish gift bags for guest and staff, that's just doing business. I'm a serious business person. I don't get to choose if we waste our money, that's the standard."

It's been said many time, many ways on this topic on the farms. If you want to give money, give it directly.
 
Update:
1702183714879.png
Karl is also making a response. This one is in a week, though I'd assume that's more sponsor-related than anything else.
[Link / Archive]
 
I really hope he takes Karl and Mutahar to court, just so they can countersue his fraudulent ass. I hope they sue him for every vidya game in his collection, leave him with nothing to play!
Now I am not a lawyer, but I follow some spergs who hold JDs, allegedly. The first obstacle I see is proving damages, and the second is jurisdiction. Muta is Canadian and Karl is Australian; I'm not saying it can't be done, but do the courts even allow that? How would they go about enforce it?

"You hurt my social standing." - Jirard

"Yeah fuck you cunt." - Karl, hopefully, Australians say cunt a lot, right?
 
It seems to be that no matter the out come of any audit or further investigation, Jirard's credibility should be permanently damaged from this. He is on record saying that the money had been donated when it is now a known fact that the money wasn't donated and he knew this. Why would he lie about donating the money? He can't plead ignorance anymore. That alone stinks enough for nobody to trust him again.
 
Now I am not a lawyer, but I follow some spergs who hold JDs, allegedly. The first obstacle I see is proving damages, and the second is jurisdiction. Muta is Canadian and Karl is Australian; I'm not saying it can't be done, but do the courts even allow that? How would they go about enforce it?

"You hurt my social standing." - Jirard

"Yeah fuck you cunt." - Karl, hopefully, Australians say cunt a lot, right?
Considering Canada and Australia are friendly with the US, it's not an impossible lawsuit. The issue is enforcement and finding a court that would allow such jurisdictional reach. Legal paperwork would almost definitely tie up the entire thing for years, costing Jirard a lot of money convincing a court that they need to care.
 
This is not Jobst first suit against him. Jirard is talk but if he did sue Karl, Karl would win and then make nonstop videos rubbing it in Beardman's face, just like he does with Billy Mitchell.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo