🌟 Internet Famous Jirard Khalil / The Completionist / ThatOneVideoGamer - Obsessive Compulsive Autist involved in a $780k case of charity fraud

Spoiler: Warning NSFW

She has no bellybutton!! :o

Turns out she has a wordpress blog in which she goes into detail about how she was raped by a black guy. Actually it happened twice.

https://archive.is/wip/byM3K https://archive.is/wip/774Xj
The guy who raped her was Kenon Brinkley who was the president of Students Government at Witchita State College at the time. Here is a news article about it. Here is a photo of him fronting the allegations. After the story got out he stepped down.

SGA-6985.jpg

Does he know what she's doing online? Can you imagine this guy's reaction to learning he is having his named dragged through the mud on social despite the fact that he has nothing to do with any of the Jirard stuff and has just become some mudshark's anecdote. Hilarious!
 
I think that the funniest part about this "rape" story is that after Maia was the throat goat because he didn't have any condoms and he ghosted her for a month she decided to rent a hotel room and invite him to it. He allegedly rawdogs her doggystyle wihout a condom and then leaves immediately afterwards to ghost her again only for her to ruin his life a year later.
Yeah, this whole mess reads like her sexual fantasy that she tried twisting into a rape story for sweet victim points. Behind the screen, we all know she's fucking flicking her bean to the imagination of getting fucked raw and impregnated by some guy who won't even look in her general direction.

It's weird because she's also fucking married. But honestly, her husband sounds like a cuck who'd be okay with open relationships, then cry in the corner while his wife whores herself out to chubby chasers.
Does he know what she's doing online? Can you imagine this guy's reaction to learning he is having his named dragged through the mud on social despite the fact that he has nothing to do with any of the Jirard stuff and has just become some mudshark's anecdote. Hilarious!
Maybe I'm fucking weird but I'd be highly irritated if it was me.

And honestly, it makes it apparent to me that she's lying just because he doesn't wanna fuck someone who is very quickly turning into an insane loony bitch with clingy attachment patterns.

I get that people cope differently but the way she's acting makes me think she has to convince herself of its true nature in order to convince us.

Powelevel here but Maia here gives me the same vibes as a girl I know who bragged about being raped 8 times by different men because she was so drop-dead gorgeous or shit like that. And she told the tales so lightheartedly, that it immediately made me suspicious.

"Btw, I was raped. Don't forget I was raped. Did you know I was raped? Because I was raped and it's important to know that I was raped. Therefore let it be known that I was raped And my rapist was a hot stud with a big blackcock er, I mean a black man who took advantage of me, a woman and he needs to fuck my fat dirty hole raw with his big juicy cock and call me Ms. Piggy I MEAN to be held accountable."

"Does that sound good, cuck husband?"

I'm not sorry for the grossness of this.
 
Me getting back up to date on things.
But note that Jirard looks back at his mother and calls her a "strong woman."
Seeing how her husband set up two businesses, she fucked both up, and than basically ran off with Jirard to be a whore while stealing half a million from dear old dad, "Strong woman" is the last thing I think of with that story.
That whole story makes it sound like his mother asked for a divorce, and his father had her committed.

Are we *sure* she had dementia?
I'm still pro to this theory. Daddy slides a few smackers to send her to the funny farm after absolutely humiliating him. Wouldn't particularly blame him for that play either to be honest. But I could also believe it was true dementia.
Jirard, a little real talk for your fat ass:

Being slightly racist while half drunk is nowhere near as bad as stealing over SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS from DEMENTIA PATIENTS over TEN YEARS. It's not even in the same galaxy, you fucking nincompoop.

At least you didn't show your weird dick to teenagers while dressed as sailor mercury, so you're not the worst of the Normal Boots alumnus.
In current year + almost 8, the first thing is the greatest of crimes and the second stunning and brave.
Like I said previously, there's no stories of Mommy happily giving hugs and kisses, of tenderly patching up scrapes and bruises, or making delicious cookies just because.
Only story is "she gave me the monkey game". And a fine game it is, but if that's all the good shit you can tell me about your mom, odds there wasn't that much good to remiss about.
He's pushing for that DKC2 video, or crying to his 498794 therapists.
Rock and a hard place, you either never release it and one of the core tenets of the Completionist stays unresolved or you drop it and see that dislike bar go through the roof in what you considered would be your most impactful video and a nice sendoff. Much sad.
Humorously she tries to add credence to her argument by talking about how she was raped
Ah, stop the presses, an irrelevant heffer that was "raped" likes Jirard, all is forgiven!
Basically this: "I'm a victim of rape. I like Jirard. Therefore if you criticize Jirard, you're criticizing me, a victim of rape.
Thankfully me too has made me immune to this strat for the most part.
Turns out she has a wordpress blog in which she goes into detail about how she was raped by a black guy. Actually it happened twice.
Ah, and a coal burner as well. Jirard must be full of joy and glee with such a heavyweight (tehe) on his side.
The video has some funny moments like when he accuses Mutahar and Karl Jobst of using the language and tactics of the alt-right despite not being politically alt-right.
Where's a screen cap of "everything I don't like is Hitler" when you need it!
 
I think women like Maia get off on being a rape victim because the implication is that someone, somewhere found her sexually desirable. I definitely think that Gavin is a cuckold, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a bull they saw regularly.
20231230_075901.jpg
 
Última edición:
Only story is "she gave me the monkey game". And a fine game it is, but if that's all the good shit you can tell me about your mom, odds there wasn't that much good to remiss about.
Pretty much this, I can tie Secret of Mana to my mom; but it's not the only thing I can say I remember about her. In fact, I only bring her up when talking to people and I get asked to rank certain games; like in one of the threads in the Games section on this site. I recognize that Chrono Trigger is a superior game, but I put Secret of Mana up above it due to sentimental issues, mainly stuff with my mom. But that's if someone were to ask me specific questions about games; you ask me about my mom, I could give you at least two dozen different stories and such without much thought. I'd also probably have sincerity issues, if my mom literally kidnapped me to use me as a prop while following around some crazy pastor; if that happened and you asked me about my mom, "Yeah, so there was a year or so where she was a crazy bitch." It may not be nice Jirard, but you even said you shouldn't have made it past the fifth grade because of it. You can still love your mom, but you need something more than DKC2.
 
2 things. First, I dislike Muta personally but respect what he's been doing with Karl to expose this fat fuck and have no ill towards him he just comes across as holier than thou or really mid normie fence sitter on everything usually. all that said it made me laugh he was like uh sorry you got raped but the fuck does that have to do with me?! and his response to that girl's video is justified and he was much nicer than he should have been. she was attacking him for nothing and made nothing of note. the other thing is, my mom bought me plenty of games and movies and toys and shit for holidays or birthdays and those are LITERALLY the very last things I would think of if my mother came to mind. she wasn't a saint or anything but I have a hell of a lot more to remember her for and she means more to me then she bought me donkey kong country (which mine did buy me coincidentally)
I guess what I'm saying is could you imagine being such a consume brained retard your go to thing about why you cared about someone is something they gave you as a gift?
 
Última edición:
I think women like Maia get off on being a rape victim because the implication is that someone, somewhere found her sexually desirable. I definitely think that Gavin is a cuckold, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a bull they saw regularly.
Rape fantasies are apparently not uncommon in women but it's the first time I've seen someone so blatant about it. Kinda creepy.
Only story is "she gave me the monkey game". And a fine game it is, but if that's all the good shit you can tell me about your mom, odds there wasn't that much good to remiss about.
Indeed. My birth mom also gave me a bunch of games and two Playstations but I can tell more than one fucking story that doesn't relate to vidya games at all. For better and for worse.

Also how manipulative that he's dedicating this video to his mommy in hindsight of everything.
 
If he does end up making his DKC2 video it would have to be absolutely pathetic no matter what he does. Either he decides to play it himself and seethes the entire time, he gets his staff to play it for him because it would be too traumatic for him, or he uses footage of a past playthrough that either he or somebody else did. The video itself would just be him using his dead mom again in a tone deaf way of trying to get sympathy and save face, not realizing that him bringing her up would be worse.
 
If he does end up making his DKC2 video it would have to be absolutely pathetic no matter what he does. Either he decides to play it himself and seethes the entire time, he gets his staff to play it for him because it would be too traumatic for him, or he uses footage of a past playthrough that either he or somebody else did. The video itself would just be him using his dead mom again in a tone deaf way of trying to get sympathy and save face, not realizing that him bringing her up would be worse.
The best thing he can do is replay it on stream while going into detail on how much of a cunt his mother was during the 9 month whore out escapades and how much of a fucking faggot his father was to deserve it. I still wouldn't forgive him, but it would be great to see him drop the nice guy act and just unleash all of his daddy and mommy issues in a grand explosion. Hell, maybe 3 of his 5 therapists would think of it being cathartic.
 
If he does end up making his DKC2 video it would have to be absolutely pathetic no matter what he does. Either he decides to play it himself and seethes the entire time, he gets his staff to play it for him because it would be too traumatic for him, or he uses footage of a past playthrough that either he or somebody else did. The video itself would just be him using his dead mom again in a tone deaf way of trying to get sympathy and save face, not realizing that him bringing her up would be worse.

Since they already did a 100% run on super beard bros all he needs to do is write the script.

The bigger problem is he always said his penultimate episode was to be Final Fantasy VI. Whether that still holds true now, of course, has yet to be seen.
 
Since they already did a 100% run on super beard bros all he needs to do is write the script.

The bigger problem is he always said his penultimate episode was to be Final Fantasy VI. Whether that still holds true now, of course, has yet to be seen.
LOL, LMAO even

Forgot about that promise as well, I can at most see him randomly shitting one more episode, but no way in hell are 2 going out.
 
and we're off to the races...autist vs autist

Karl responds to that lawyer vid, and that lawyer chimes in

here's some of it
u/karl-jobst

Moon Channel completely mischaracterised my arguments​

It's a huge shame because I was looking forward to their legal analysis. However most of it doesn't even apply because they (intentionally?) mischaracterised what I said.
For example, in my response video to Jirard's video, I gave the SPECIFIC definitions to words I used (i.e charity fraud, embezzlement). I then applied those definitions. You don't get to choose which definitions I have to use. I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not referring to specific statutes. I gave you a definition, and then I applied it, it's as simple as that. You can choose your own definitions and apply them, but that's your business.
A lawyer explains the difference well HERE.
Furthermore, Moon COMPLETELY mischaracterised my issue with the bits, subs etc. It's as if he has no idea what I was talking about at all. He was so clueless it's almost hard to fathom it wasn't done in bad faith. He says my problem was that Open Hand used donations to pay for expenses? No, I never said that. I said the bits/subs never made it to Open Hand in the first place, and that JIRARD spent to the bits/subs/merch money. How can Moon get this so totally wrong?
And then he talks about the money I made which is shockingly illogical. I make a lot of money REGARDLESS of what the topic is. I made no more money covering this than I would have made covering ANYTHING ELSE. And I didn't sponsor the first video which meant I made LESS money. Again I ask, how can someone who tries to act so smart in their video get basic logic so wrong?
Ultimately I have to conclude this person has an agenda, which is unfortunate. Again, it's a shame because I was looking forward to the legal analysis.

Moonsight
·2 hr. ago
Hi Karl, first and foremost, I'm grateful that you took the time to watch the video. I'm Moony, of Moon Channel, just to be clear.
I understand that I'm stepping into the hornet's nest a little bit here, but I think that a healthy dialogue sometimes involves a bit of disagreement, and getting to the truth of a matter at times isn't always a clean affair.
Regarding definitions, I'm afraid I don't quite understand the disagreement. You can say you aren't referring to specific statutes, but you made legal allegations, and those are the statutes that pertain to your claims. If this was strictly an argument of immorality, and not legality, then you get to pick the definition. But, you said that Jirard's conduct was almost certainly illegal. I applied the legal definitions, in what I think was a balanced perspective.
Now, if your point is, your claims aren't meant to be legal claims, then I apologize: I've read your intentions wrongly, which is something we're all capable of.
With regards to the issue concerning bits, and subs, I don't appreciate the leap straight to bad faith. While we're on the topic of misunderstanding though, may I ask how you came to conclude that Jirard spent the bits/subs/merch money on his person?
If you allege that the money never made it to Jirard, pursuant to misreporting on the tax returns, then isn't this a mere presumption? Maybe I missed something in the videos, some hard paper evidence that exists, which I managed to overlook: if so, then I've made a mistake in the analysis.
And hey, you make a lot of money regardless of what the topic is. It just so happens, this time, the topic is this thing. Maybe you're right about the Completionist: if you're right, I'll eat my words, and even go so far as to put my money where my mouth is and contribute further to the Alzheimer's Association -- I'll happily donate the sponsored income from that video on top of the $500 out of pocket donation I'm making.
But, will you also take the pledge with me, in writing, to donate your income from your videos, if you are wrong?
I've had people reach out to me and tell me how much they respect your work, and all the good that you've done. I respect you very much for that. But, I don't appreciate this accusation of bad faith right out of the gate. If you believe I have an agenda, I'd like to hear what you think it is.

karl-jobst


Hi Moony.
I assume bad faith because you obviously have the ability to do good research, which is clear from your research into legal definitions etc. However from the video it is clear you only applied that to the law, and failed to do that with the statements I made in my video. This demonstrates a clear bias, and given the other attacks you made against me in the video, bad faith is the logical conclusion. I won't give you the courtesy of assuming good faith when you have not done the same to me.
Jirard admitted to spending the bits/subs/merch on indieland, which is not Open Hand and is not a charity. It's a private event run by his company That One Video Entertainment. He cannot solicited donations under the premise they will be sent to Open Hand, and then spend it on his own company expenses. I made the conclusion that the bits/subs/merch weren't going to Open Hand because the tax filings don't reflect that, and then Jirard confirmed it in his response video.
I don't understand why you would think my claims or definitions are anything but the definitions I showed on screen. I know you personally don't like using the definitions I used, but why assume I meant anything other than what I explained?
If I am wrong in what sense? You haven't said what I'm wrong about? I believe I am correct in the definitions that I provided. What you have done is slight of hand, changed the definition after the fact and then used that to say I'm incorrect.
I appreciate the discourse though sincerely.
 
The bits and subs hang up Moon had was really weird saying that as long as Jirard was speaking as the Open Hand director, anything he does with the bits and subs would be legal. Then when he said he didn't listen to the unedited phone call "because the videos should hold up on their own" it made sense because in that call Jirard made it very clear that Indieland and Open Hand are two distinct operations under two different companies. What an idiot to make a video without proper research and then claim that he shouldn't have to research his topics. If he's a practicing lawyer, I really hope he doesn't treat his clients like that.

His Patreon is pretty funny too, with people saying that he won the argument, when all it showed is that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of what he was trying to cover.
 
The moon guy seems dumb as a box of rocks but I guess that's why he's an internet lawyer. Youtube comments on his videos all sucking him off about how well he explains law to the plebs and how non bias he is jesus that is one easy ass job.

He really thinks Karl potentially caused a charity to lose donations... lol he's the only reason any of the money got donated. And of course he didn't listen to the discord call or know about it at all apparently.

The bits and subs hang up Moon had was really weird saying that as long as Jirard was speaking as the Open Hand director, anything he does with the bits and subs would be legal. Then when he said he didn't listen to the unedited phone call "because the videos should hold up on their own" it made sense because in that call Jirard made it very clear that Indieland and Open Hand are two distinct operations under two different companies. What an idiot to make a video without proper research and then claim that he shouldn't have to research his topics. If he's a practicing lawyer, I really hope he doesn't treat his clients like that.

His Patreon is pretty funny too, with people saying that he won the argument, when all it showed is that he doesn't have even a basic understanding of what he was trying to cover.
Ya his immediate cope post on Patreon and liking (and probably soon pinning to hide mean ones) positive comments on youtube is a telltale sign of a retard grifter. This guy is as bad as current Rekieta when it comes to legal takes and I doubt he is as drunk.

It seems like this dude has a hard on for raising money for charity and really thinks Karl fucked over a charity or something by making those videos but I really have no idea why.
 
He really thinks Karl potentially caused a charity to lose donations... lol he's the only reason any of the money got donated. And of course he didn't listen to the discord call or know about it at all apparently.
reading that comment in the sub really made me go :stress:...the leaps of logic to blame karl that charities will potentially lose donations...and not the actual guy who didn't donate shit, whlist claiming to be donating... is mind boggling.
 
If you think this Moon guy is being a complete retard, let me inform you he's made these two videos as well talking about Tranny Rights and "muh TAWKSICITY IN GAMING!!!"
 
Atrás
Top Abajo