💊 Manosphere Jack Murphy / John Murphy Goldman / Bigbadbeard1000 / Jacked Brunch / Liminal Order - Bearded grifter of the Manosphere and an actual cuck

I found a twitter response on a now-deleted tweet of Jack's wishing him a happy birthday on January 17. One guy who says "happy birthday" is a journalist with a blue checkmark named Jordan Schachtel.
Ver archivo adjunto 2855998

ETA: Correction - not deleted, I just can't see it because he has locked down.
Fair enough; appreciate the response. At the very least the amateur muay thai titles are confirmed bullshit.

On another note, has anyone ever seen Jack and Tom Segura in the same room together? I have questions. I swear the resemblance of both their appearance and voice is uncanny... you know, minus the rolls Tom has and the dicks in Jack's asshole
 
There are plenty of good people that get suckered into things like Scientology. Usually they are in a vulnerable place. They're probably just looking to fill a hole in their lives. And the shame is that, as others pointed out in this thread, there probably is a void to fill in this area of what it means to be a man in the modern day.

What I don't like is that someone like Jordan Peterson more or less gets the same treatment here as this fag. There is a difference between someone who has a gift but isn't perfect and a scammer who puts dildos up his ass.
Well they came to the right place for getting any and all holes filled.
 
There are plenty of good people that get suckered into things like Scientology. Usually they are in a vulnerable place. They're probably just looking to fill a hole in their lives. And the shame is that, as others pointed out in this thread, there probably is a void to fill in this area of what it means to be a man in the modern day.

What I don't like is that someone like Jordan Peterson more or less gets the same treatment here as this fag. There is a difference between someone who has a gift but isn't perfect and a scammer who puts dildos up his ass.
I mean, I'm more forgiving of a figurative cuck who's at least man enough to just be his dorky self than a literal cuck who's an aggro macho shithead.

Internet daddies are pretty lame no matter what, though. At least Scientology makes cooler promises.
 
I don't know about Tom Segura, but I hear from a well placed source that this guy has a very similar vibe as Jack Murphy. Probably a member of the LO if I had to guess.

Tom Sauer:
1641324241808.png
 
In the end, Ortega is a New York "journalist" so he's more than likely a leftist and a legit faggot which is going to color his take on just about anything. Pretty bad when your gay bullshit makes Miscavige sympathetic.
Lol no. Miscavige hired a guy to murder his wife's parents. No amount of slander (and I have yet to see any proof that Ortega slandered Scientology) against him would make him "sympathetic" to you unless you're a literal retard or a fellow murderer.
 
Última edición:
There was one particular person here who said: 'let's dig up these members and see if we can find a few more lolcows among them"

that's wrong. and that's who I was responding too.

From my POV the way to have a laugh and try to prevent others from falling for this kind of thing in the future is to get dumps of the actual text of the onboarding VS the flowchart. Text like the questions asked. Less of a single screenshot of the text.

Then what he was doing can get compared to other things like from the original Anons who did the Scientology
dump. Same with comparing to other groups.

Far more useful than "there is a secret message in the QR codes" where that message is A/B testing done in marketing.


There were 800 members if we can believe Jack.

How he gets to be "truthful" on that is 800 over all of time. Look at the leaked your IT sucks doc with the 'I quit this thing and STILL have access'.

Claim membership gets you access and never revoke the access.

And no where have I seen a claim part of this smacks of the "Art of Charm" folks. They claimed access to mover and shakers if you joined 'em. And were about 'bettering people'.
 
Última edición:
Don't want to be that guy, but for posterity's sake and TO STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION I took a screenshot of Dr. Dickenballs superchat.
Sydney misspelled his name wrong.
Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBXBSfn4tkY&t=1551s
Dr. Dickenballs explosive superchat.png
Dickenballs superchat_cropped.png

Dr. Dickenballs receipts
Dr. Dickenballs interview
Dr. Dickenballs wrote he will be retiring his account after the next and last super chat on You Are Here first stream of 2022, which he did.
Dickenballs retiring.png
image_2022-01-04_230748.png
Dr. Dickenballs, you accidental hero! Your legacy is legendary and you won't be forgotten.
 
Última edición:
Lol no. Miscavige hired a guy to murder his wife's parents. No amount of slander (and I have yet to see any proof that Ortega slandered Scientology) against him would make him "sympathetic" to you unless you're a literal retard or a fellow murderer.

P.S. The guy who posted that Ortega defended Harvey Weinstein is a liar.
I was responding to the guy that said Ortega's shit made him feel like Scientology was misunderstood. Perhaps I could have phrased it better, but I find Miscavige a reprehensible toad who deserves to get Tyroned in prison.
 
What makes them decent people? Or are we just applying "innocent until proven guilty?"

Asking me, anyone who goes through "50 onboarding interviews" to join a "cohort" is a scammer, a homosexual predator, or a dunce.

And / or


Not that I mind them replying in this thread, mind. Doxxxxxxxing is generally unwarranted.
Fine. "innocent until proven guilty" if that suits you better.

People pay for stupid things all the time: Joel Osteen, Tai Lopez, etc.

Should all these people be publicly hanged?

Not to me.

I'd still love for more LO anon's to come into this thread and tell us more about what sort stuff the group did and more about Jack etc.

But unless members have personally done something illegal/immoral/newsworthy-----I dont need their real names to get the lulz
 
There's something about this subscribtion grifts that I just think makes them extra bad. If you are just a random guru selling a useless book for 25$ that is one thing. If you set it up in a way that the people you prey on have to pay 100$ a month that allows you to rob way more money from them until they wise up. 25 $ for most even less well off people is not a disatrous amount of money to loose, a 100$ a month is a lot of money to most people.
I did this big binge of coffeezilla's youtube channel several months ago. I had no idea so many 'make you a millionaire' scams exists and how the fleece you of money slowly---he interviewed people who were in them----there's always another tier, more secrets to share, if you just pay more and more.

And they also use that fake scarcity tactic to make these people desperate to pay for the higher levels.

It's probably a small group of the overall population who falls for things like this, it's still disheartening that people can be duped like this at all.
 
have you read Tony Ortega's blog recently? according to him this website is literally just as much of a con as Scientology, and that 8chan's admins should be publicly executed and that Russia hacked our elections to install Trump as dictator, and that Weinstein was set-up by Scientologists and has never been inappropriate with a woman ever, and Ortega can personally attest to that because they sit close to each other every Yom Kippur and Rosh Hoshanah
Holy shiiiiit. I admit I haven't checked the Bunker in months, and always skipped posts that didn't sound like they were lazer-focused on covering Scientology nuttiness. That said, I remember that years back Ortega got hyper-defensive about his work with the Village Voice, and his connects to their back pages section or whatever, with always struck me as shady. To me, Ortega is in the Todd in the Shaws category--someone who I occasionally watch/listen to and enjoy unironically, yet I wouldn't blink and eye in they had a cringey public meltdown.
 
Cernovich and Posobeic almost have to be members don't they? Maybe not paying members, I could see Jack inviting them in for free to try gain credibility.

Cernovich, Posobeic, and Tim were not members. Their continued absence was actually a major red flag as time went on and they continued to talk up Jack and the LO.

Asking me, anyone who goes through "50 onboarding interviews" to join a "cohort" is a scammer, a homosexual predator, or a dunce.

This process was a pretty new thing, and developed by the membership not Jack. Going to reiterate that a major feature of the grift was that Jack got to be pretty hands-off while raking in the $$$.

The whole 'cohort' concept was the 'membership is only open to 50 dudes at a time' thing. Each period of sign ups being open produced a 'cohort'.

There were 800 members if we can believe Jack. Which we probably cant. Would not be surprised if there are only like 300 members or something and most of them have left since all this came out.

I believe this number is the total number of people who ever joined. There was an 'all hands' channel which every current member was in, I never saw it above 400.

The last info I got was that count was down to ~30.
 
This process was a pretty new thing, and developed by the membership not Jack. Going to reiterate that a major feature of the grift was that Jack got to be pretty hands-off while raking in the $$$.

The whole 'cohort' concept was the 'membership is only open to 50 dudes at a time' thing. Each period of sign ups being open produced a 'cohort'.
Whether Jack was involved or not doesn't make it not incredibly lulzy and retarded.
 
Whether Jack was involved or not doesn't make it not incredibly lulzy and retarded.

Yea that shit seemed retarded, but actually going through it was after my time so I can't really comment on it.

Fine. "innocent until proven guilty" if that suits you better.

People pay for stupid things all the time: Joel Osteen, Tai Lopez, etc.

Should all these people be publicly hanged?

Not to me.

I'd still love for more LO anon's to come into this thread and tell us more about what sort stuff the group did and more about Jack etc.

But unless members have personally done something illegal/immoral/newsworthy-----I dont need their real names to get the lulz


Real talk; its actually shockingly boring who was in the LO.

Almost nobody who has any kind of public persona whatsoever, and tbh all of the people like that who I know of have already been namedropped in this thread.

Even when it comes to Jack, his masculinity grift and the shit he said on Tim Pool and his own podcast are way more lulzy than the LO beyond the mere fact of its existence. Most people are missing the mark on what he was selling w/ the LO (prepackaged networking without risk of ideology conflicts), because it is way more fun to claim he was selling coaching on how to be a man.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo