Opinion Israel must stop weaponising the Holocaust - Scholars of genocide are criticizing the dangerous use of the Holocaust to justify Israeli mass violence against Palestinians

Israel must stop weaponising the Holocaust
Raz Segal
Scholars of genocide are criticizing the dangerous use of the Holocaust to justify Israeli mass violence against Palestinians
Tue 24 Oct 2023 14.26 EDT
1698332954510.png
Smoke and debris rises after an Israeli strike on Gaza earlier this month. Photograph: Jack Guez/AFP/Getty Images

President Joe Biden began his remarks in Israel with this: “Hamas committed atrocities that recall the worst ravages of Isis, unleashing pure unadulterated evil upon the world. There is no rationalizing it, no excusing it. Period. The brutality we saw would have cut deep anywhere in the world, but it cuts deeper here in Israel. October 7, which was a … sacred Jewish holiday, became the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust.

“It has brought to the surface painful memories and scars left by millennia of antisemitism and the genocide of the Jewish people. The world watched then, it knew, and the world did nothing.

“We will not stand by and do nothing again. Not today, not tomorrow, not ever.”

With this, Biden reinforced the rhetorical framework that the former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett expressed, in typically unashamed terms, in an interview on Sky News on 12 October: “We’re fighting Nazis.”

A powerful state, with powerful allies and a powerful army, engaged in a retaliatory attack against stateless Palestinians under Israeli-settler colonial rule, military occupation and siege, is thus portrayed as powerless Jews in a struggle against Nazis. This historical context in no way justifies or excuses the mass murder of 1,500 Israelis on 7 October, which constitutes a war crime and crimes against humanity. This was the single largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, which deeply shocked Jews and many others around the world. The context of the Hamas attack on Israelis, however, is completely different from the context of the attack on Jews during the Holocaust. And without the historical context of Israeli settler colonialism since the 1948 Nakba, we cannot explain how we got here, nor imagine different futures; Biden offered us, instead, the decontextualized image of “pure, unadulterated evil.”

This weaponization of Holocaust memory by Israeli politicians runs deep. In 1982, for instance, in the context of Israel’s attack on Lebanon, the Israeli PM, Menachem Begin, compared the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in Beirut to Adolf Hitler in his bunker in Berlin at the end of the war. Three decades later, in October 2015, Benjamin Netanyahu took this weaponization to new levels when he asserted in a speech to the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem that the Palestinian grand mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini planted the idea to murder Jews in Hitler’s mind. And last Tuesday, Netanyahu described Hamas in a press conference, together with the German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, as the “new Nazis”.

The Israeli defense minister, Yoav Gallant said: “Gaza will not return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything.” Nissim Vaturi, a member of the Israeli parliament for the ruling Likud party, to take another example, called for “erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth”. There are many other such expressions by Israeli politicians and senior army officers in the last few weeks. The fantasy of “fighting Nazis” drives such explicit language, because the image of Nazis is one of “pure, unadulterated evil”, which removes all laws and restrictions in the fight against it. Perpetrators of genocide always see their victims as evil and themselves as righteous. This is, indeed, how Nazis saw Jews.

Biden’s words constitute therefore a textbook use of the Holocaust not in order to stand with powerless people facing the prospect of genocidal violence, but to support and justify an extremely violent attack by a powerful state and, at the same time, distort this reality. But we see the reality in front of our eyes: since the start of Israeli mass violence on 7 October, the number of Palestinians killed in Gaza has surpassed 4,650, a third of them children, with more than 15,000 injured and over a million people displaced.

Israel has also escalated the violence against Palestinians under occupation in the West Bank, including the killing of more than 95 people and an intensification of expulsions, including the destruction of whole communities. Hamas wields no power in the West Bank, but the reality that we can all see means little for Israelis fighting, in their minds, Nazis.

We have seen this sort of use of Holocaust memory in another case of mass violence not too long ago. On 24 January 2020, the Russian president Vladimir Putin was invited to speak at the fifth World Holocaust Forum at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem, to mark 75 years to the liberation of Auschwitz by Soviet forces. In his speech, Putin presented a distorted history of the second world war and the Holocaust, including distorted maps, to fit a Russian narrative that erased the Nazi-Soviet alliance in the destruction of Poland in 1939 and presented Ukrainians, Latvians and Lithuanians primarily as Nazi collaborators.

Putin used precisely this weaponization of Holocaust history when he launched his assault on Ukraine in February last year, explaining it as a campaign of “denazification”. Explicit and unashamed, just like Bennett. Putin thus used the Holocaust to create a world turned upside down: Ukrainians facing a brutal and unprovoked Russian attack became Nazis.

The history of the Holocaust, however, does offer lessons for the current bloodshed.

For one, it reminds us to center the voices and perspectives of those facing state violence and genocide. And the most urgent thing that Palestinians in Gaza now need is a ceasefire and an end to the Israeli bombing campaign. That is also what at least some of the Israeli survivors of the Hamas attack and family members of Israeli civilians killed or in captivity in Gaza want. A top priority now should be stopping the unfolding violence, saving lives, and the release of Israeli hostages together with hundreds of Palestinian civilians, including 160 children, detained by Israel unlawfully, without charges or trial.

The history of the Holocaust also points to the importance of accountability, even as post-Holocaust accountability remained limited. In the case of Israel’s assault on Gaza, accountability needs to begin from what is very clear: incitement to genocide, which is punishable under article 3 of the UN genocide convention, even when genocide does not follow. While the debate about genocide in Israel’s current assault on Gaza will undoubtedly continue for years, perhaps also in international courts, Israeli war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law are beyond dispute.

It will also be important then that Israeli perpetrators of war crimes and those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law in the many years of the siege on Gaza, including during this current assault, will stand trial. Palestinian leaders and Palestinians who perpetrated the mass atrocities on 7 October should also be held accountable. International courts and legal processes are important because they hold potential to become spaces, however limited, for survivors to tell their stories, assert their humanity, and demand truth and justice.

Indeed, no value related to the study of the Holocaust and its memory occupies a more central place perhaps than truth. No justice is possible, not in the short term and certainly not in the long term, without a truthful reckoning of how we got here. This means recognizing fully the long history of Israeli settler-colonial violence against Palestinians since the 1948 Nakba.

The world is indeed watching, as Biden said, and it knows, despite Biden’s use of the Holocaust to distort what is clearly in front of our eyes, as more than 800 scholars of international law, conflict studies, and Holocaust and Genocide Studies declared in a statement on 15 October: “We are compelled to sound the alarm about the possibility of the crime of genocide being perpetrated by Israeli forces against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. We do not do so lightly, recognizing the weight of this crime, but the gravity of the current situation demands it.” Scholars whose work has shaped the field of Holocaust and genocide studies, such as Omer Bartov and Marion Kaplan, signed the statement.

This is significant. More and more Holocaust and genocide studies scholars are refusing to allow the continuation of the dangerous use of the Holocaust to distort the historical reality of the Holocaust and Israeli mass violence against Palestinians. This provides some hope in these dark days, as it supports the struggle for a different future, beyond the Israeli settler state, a future that should be based on equality, justice, freedom and dignity for all the people who live between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

Raz Segal is an associate professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Stockton University and the endowed professor in the study of modern genocide



Explore more on these topics


(+)
Source : https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/oct/24/israel-gaza-palestinians-holocaust
 
If my country were attacked by marauding, bloodthirsty savages who raped, tortured, and murdered hundreds of my countrymen, I think I would be morally right in hunting them down and killing them all even if my counterattack meant hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of enemy civilians would suffer and die as a result. Too bad for you, pal. Sorry about the napalm.

To the point of the article, the Israelis invoke the Holocaust because the Palestinians and their allies clearly intend another one. The Jewish scholar who wrote the article is desperately attempting to reconcile his Jewishness with his far-Left political ideology even though his commie gentile fellow travelers want him dead.

"This isn't the Holocaust!" the Jewish scholar cries. No, it isn't. The Germans were far more organized and efficient, as Germans tend to be. Methods might differ but the goal is identical. The desired end is the same.
"I chose to place my Jewish ethnostate smack dab in the middle of a region that hates Jews, and now I'm constantly being attacked! How could I have possibly known?!"
 
"I chose to place my Jewish ethnostate smack dab in the middle of a region that hates Jews, and now I'm constantly being attacked! How could I have possibly known?!"
While not a historian or an expert on the Middle East, I'm guessing the Jews made their home in Israel because they felt they had a claim to the land. Or they felt it was God's will. Probably a mix of both. I'm also guessing they knew they would be in nearly perpetual conflict with their neighbors, just as they were before the Romans came. Even if the Arabs and Persians and Palestinians manage to slaughter every Jew there down to the last baby in the last mother's arms, I strongly doubt peace will magically descend upon the Middle East.
 
That's what they've done for decades, and now it's come back to bite them right on the tuchus. It's beautiful to see.
 
While not a historian or an expert on the Middle East, I'm guessing the Jews made their home in Israel because they felt they had a claim to the land. Or they felt it was God's will. Probably a mix of both. I'm also guessing they knew they would be in nearly perpetual conflict with their neighbors, just as they were before the Romans came. Even if the Arabs and Persians and Palestinians manage to slaughter every Jew there down to the last baby in the last mother's arms, I strongly doubt peace will magically descend upon the Middle East.
Only a small percentage of the population of Palestine before WWI was Jewish. Zionism was a fundamentally colonial project, even its founders were open about the fact that it would require dispossessing the people who already lived in Palestine. Importantly, Palestine was not the only option for a Jewish state that was looked at: the Kimberley Plan (for example) was a proposal to establish it in northern Australia. The British Empire also offered land in what is now Uganda to Jewish settlers. There was no inherent reason why the Zionist project had to happen in Palestine. There were many similar proposals if you're willing to do a bit of digging (including one that actually happened, the "Jewish Autonomous Oblast" which was established in Siberia).

Plus, at least with the Kimberley Plan the number of people who would have been displaced would have been far less. The land was already colonized, so objections on those grounds would have also been far less substantial. But instead they chose a place with a high population density, that already had established towns and cities, that by any metric was capable of hosting a modern state. Even if you're willing to dismiss the Palestinians as "savages", they were still far more (for lack of a better word) advanced than Australian aboriginals.

And on that point about Palestinians being "savages": I don't see how anyone couldn't at least understand why the Palestinians are pissed that their land was taken from them and that they are treated like second-class citizens under an oppressive occupation in their own country (keep in mind that Hebron, the city the linked video is about, is in the West Bank and so should be under Palestinian authority by every agreement under international law and yet they are still at the whims of the IDF). You can't treat people like dogs and then act shocked when they eventually bite you.
 
Jesus, I almost thought you wrote this article for a second, but this shit is too gay for even Kiwifarms.
(Also political takes are gay. If you're a proud liberal, you're a faggot. If you're proud conservative you're also a faggot. That is all.)
Also the writer is an Israeli-American historian, after a simple searchup, so what the legitimate fuck is going on????
Some self-reflection, and realizations what crying wolf might lead to or moral equivocations people might use against said group in return for their actions.
There's no consolation prize for being moral or ethical if you lose to your enemies so why not use every tool at your disposal to advance your interests?
Generally I agree, but you can't be the "eternal victim" if you literally massacre a group of people. Optics are all part of Israel's and Jew's playbook, if those optics get shattered they are fucked and many of them are starting to realize it little by little. Their long game has a few fatal flaws in it, and the chickens are coming home to roost on those mistakes.
I'm also guessing they knew they would be in nearly perpetual conflict with their neighbors, just as they were before the Romans came.
Nah, they just thought their proxies would be able to destroy their enemies forever, too bad their proxy (hosts) are falling apart because of their actions thus fucking up their long term goals. Now they have to pick an outcome.
 
Well, even if it's coming from a worthless rag like The Grauniad who is so woke it doesn't know where it stand about pretty much anything, I must confess I am legitimately starting to wonder what's going on.
 
Well, even if it's coming from a worthless rag like The Grauniad who is so woke it doesn't know where it stand about pretty much anything, I must confess I am legitimately starting to wonder what's going on.
Jews getting mugged by reality that communists are never to be trusted is going on

They must? Is the Grauniad gonna stop em? :story:
 
If my country were attacked by marauding, bloodthirsty savages who raped, tortured, and murdered hundreds of my countrymen, I think I would be morally right in hunting them down and killing them all even if my counterattack meant hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of enemy civilians would suffer and die as a result.
Exactly. This is why the Palestinian cause is just despite civilian (settler) casualties
 
Generally I agree, but you can't be the "eternal victim" if you literally massacre a group of people. Optics are all part of Israel's and Jew's playbook, if those optics get shattered they are fucked and many of them are starting to realize it little by little. Their long game has a few fatal flaws in it, and the chickens are coming home to roost on those mistakes.
Agreed 100%. Israel is the wealthiest, most developed nation in the Middle East with exceptional military capabilities, nobody there is a victim of anything.

I prefer the honesty of groups like the Islamic State where they were unabashedly open about their use of violence and atrocities to achieve their aims. There was no whining about grievances or atrocities committed against Muslims, or the Crusades, or any of the other things previous groups used. They had a clear goal and it was to build a new caliphate no matter the cost.

Again, though, if you go down this path you'd better be damn sure you're going to win. Your enemy's revenge will be that much worse the more brutal you were to begin with. Varus learned that lesson the hard way in the Teutoburg Forest, as did Crassus in Parthia.
 
Exactly. This is why the Palestinian cause is just despite civilian (settler) casualties
False equivalence is a fallacy. The truth of it is the number of displaced persons caused by Israel's creation was relatively small--a problem the Palestinians exacerbated when they took sides in the 1948 war. The Palestinian presence has been propped up and held in place by the Arabs and the Persians (and other state actors) practically since Israel's modern inception. There are other reasons to keep them in place, too. The last country that tried to accept and assimilate the Palestinians were the Jordanians, whose government was nearly overthrown as a result.

The real reason so many (mainly Leftist) westerners are leaping to support the Palestinian cause isn't because they hold a love of justice but because they hold a virulent hatred of Jews. I'm not asking anyone who feels that way to explain that hatred. I frankly don't care what your reasons are. I only note it exists and take it into account whenever someone tells me rape, torture, and mass murder of civilians are somehow justifiable.
 
The last country that tried to accept and assimilate the Palestinians were the Jordanians, whose government was nearly overthrown as a result.
who ever knew an influx of foreigners with not a dime to their name end up bringing a bunch of problems?
The real reason so many (mainly Leftist) westerners are leaping to support the Palestinian cause isn't because they hold a love of justice but because they hold a virulent hatred of Jews. I'm not asking anyone who feels that way to explain that hatred. I frankly don't care what your reasons are. I only note it exists and take it into account whenever someone tells me rape, torture, and mass murder of civilians are somehow justifiable.
you're both horrible fucking people who will jump on any excuse to kill each other
 
I have to say the shit storm in the media since this shit went down has been amazing. Watching the MSM collapse into some civil cold war is just...I mean...So good. It is so good. If a bunch of people were not dying in the reals and it was not a harbinger of WWIII I would be so pleased.
 
If my country were attacked by marauding, bloodthirsty savages who raped, tortured, and murdered hundreds of my countrymen, I think I would be morally right in hunting them down and killing them all even if my counterattack meant hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of enemy civilians would suffer and die as a result. Too bad for you, pal. Sorry about the napalm.
The response being "lol fuck all of em kill the women and children who had nothing to do with it" isn't going to make you look like a better group of people though. Especially given that calling it a "war" would be farcical wrt the fact that in this situation, Israel has every conceivable advantage a country/belligerent could possibly have in a conflict.

If you have a bunch of fish in a shitty, moldy barrel and they bite you, don't expect people to rally around your cause when you throw a brick of semtex in it.

Bringing up the Hololololololocaust in this context really just makes people who otherwise might have not already, realize that it's been a cudgel all along.
 
The response being "lol fuck all of em kill the women and children who had nothing to do with it" isn't going to make you look like a better group of people though. Especially given that calling it a "war" would be farcical wrt the fact that in this situation, Israel has every conceivable advantage a country/belligerent could possibly have in a conflict.

If you have a bunch of fish in a shitty, moldy barrel and they bite you, don't expect people to rally around your cause when you throw a brick of semtex in it.

Bringing up the Hololololololocaust in this context really just makes people who otherwise might have not already, realize that it's been a cudgel all along.
They were going to grow up to be Hamas terrorists anyways. They were the retards that set up the terms of engagements and Israel happens to be way better at it than them.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo