- Registrado
- 17 de Ene, 2016
When the people here who question or (do not believe) began their questioning, what was it that first caused it?
Oftentimes I think it is emotional before it is rational. This isn't to say that opposition to divinities or religions, be they polytheistic, monotheistic, anthropomorphic deities, etc. is unreasonable- in fact it is often quite reasonable- simply that much like with religionists the first inkling tends to come from the heart rather than the head, something I think a lot of atheists are more skittish about. I find things like "no being can rightfully consider itself above me" to be common in skeptical circles, for instance, which is not necessarily an exercise in empiricism since definitions of "above" and "below" or "better" and "worse" are often so subjectively defined by all human beings. It seems like a purely emotional appeal. "I reject this Jesus fella because he thinks he is better than me and my American values taught me that no one is better than me." This isn't wrong outright of course, emotional appeals do have value in discussion if only because of philosophical pragmatism ("I believe the things which it is best to believe.") Just something to note.
I suppose what all of this autism is trying to get at is "what first made you doubt?" I find most began to question things early. I don't meet a lot of adult converts to atheism or agnosticism. People have usually decided one way or the other by then. Of course most still continue to question individual things, or change belief systems, and so on. I don't mean to question that.
Oftentimes I think it is emotional before it is rational. This isn't to say that opposition to divinities or religions, be they polytheistic, monotheistic, anthropomorphic deities, etc. is unreasonable- in fact it is often quite reasonable- simply that much like with religionists the first inkling tends to come from the heart rather than the head, something I think a lot of atheists are more skittish about. I find things like "no being can rightfully consider itself above me" to be common in skeptical circles, for instance, which is not necessarily an exercise in empiricism since definitions of "above" and "below" or "better" and "worse" are often so subjectively defined by all human beings. It seems like a purely emotional appeal. "I reject this Jesus fella because he thinks he is better than me and my American values taught me that no one is better than me." This isn't wrong outright of course, emotional appeals do have value in discussion if only because of philosophical pragmatism ("I believe the things which it is best to believe.") Just something to note.
I suppose what all of this autism is trying to get at is "what first made you doubt?" I find most began to question things early. I don't meet a lot of adult converts to atheism or agnosticism. People have usually decided one way or the other by then. Of course most still continue to question individual things, or change belief systems, and so on. I don't mean to question that.