- Registrado
- 24 de Nov, 2024
ok pedo.So you admit to being a hysterical faggot? Good to know.
now turn profile comments back on you cowardly nigger.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
ok pedo.So you admit to being a hysterical faggot? Good to know.
With the controlling of sex lives of young men comes the responsibility of making sure they're properly integrated into society proper. Simply telling someone it's wrong, so don't do it, isn't going to cut it.Sex is for married couple only.
15 years old boys aren't married to adult women, so they should not have sex with them.
PRIMITIVE SECRET SOCIETIES
CHAPTER I
THE MEN'S HOUSE
THE separation of the sexes which exists in civilized societies is the outcome, in part, of natural distinctions of sex and economic function; in part it finds an explanation in those feelings of sexual solidarity to which we owe the existence of our clubs and unions. Sexual solidarity itself is only another expression for the working of that universal law of human sympathy, or in more modern phrase, of consciousness of kind, which lies at the foundation of all social relations. But in primitive societies, to these forces bringing about sexual separation, there is added a force even more potent, which originates in widespread beliefs as to the transmissibility of sexual characteristics from one individual to another. Out of these beliefs have arisen many curious and interesting taboos designed to prevent the real or imagined dangers incident to the contact of the sexes. Sexual separation is further secured and perpetuated by the institution known as the men's house, of which examples are to be found among primitive peoples throughout the world.
The men's house is usually the largest building in a tribal settlement. It belongs in common to the villagers; it serves as council chamber and town hall, as a guest house for strangers, and as the sleeping resort of the men. Frequently seats in the house are assigned to elders and other leading individuals according to their dignity and importance. Here the more precious belongings of the community, such as trophies taken in war or in the chase, and religious emblems of various sorts are preserved. Within its precincts, women and children, and men not fully initiated members of the tribe, seldom or never enter. When marriage and the exclusive possession of a woman do not follow immediately upon initiation into the tribe, the institution of the men's house becomes an effective restraint upon the sexual proclivities of the unmarried youth. It then serves as a clubhouse for the bachelors, whose residence within it may be regarded as a perpetuation of that formal seclusion of the lads from the women, which it is the purpose of the initiation ceremonies in the first place to accomplish. Such communal living on the part of the young men is a visible token of their separation from the narrow circle of the family, and of their introduction to the duties and responsibilities of tribal life. The existence of such an institution emphasizes the fact that a settled family life with a private abode is the privilege of the older men, who alone have marital rights over the women of the tribe. For promiscuity, either before or after marriage, is the exception among primitive peoples, who attempt not only to regulate by complicated and rigorous marriage systems the sexual desires of those who are competent to marry, but actually to prevent any intercourse at all of those who are not fully initiated members of the community.
it's a man's world and that includes teenaged boys.Morally it’s wrong but (assuming the woman isn’t repulsive) we don’t have to pretend that it’s going the scar the average teen/preteen boy in the same way that it would if the sexes were reversed (at worst he’ll probably just end up rather precocious). In the crusade of pointing out feminist hypocrisy and faults in the blank slatism of classical liberalism don’t forget the underlying truthiness of men and women being fundamentally different.
Morally it’s wrong but (assuming the woman isn’t repulsive) we don’t have to pretend that it’s going the scar the average teen/preteen boy in the same way that it would if the sexes were reversed (at worst he’ll probably just end up rather precocious). In the crusade of pointing out feminist hypocrisy and faults in the blank slatism of classical liberalism don’t forget the underlying truthiness of men and women being fundamentally different.
What if the 15 year-old days yes and she keeps abusing him?…such a female is a filthy whore and should be executed by having her entrails drawn out her twat and hung on a tree.
Or else she has to marry the 15 year old.
She can choose.
But if the 15 year old boy then says No to the marriage….then she gets gutted and hung on the tree.
A flow chart will be provided.
we don’t have to pretend that it’s going the scar the average teen/preteen boy in the same way that it would if the sexes were reversed (at worst he’ll probably just end up rather precocious).
The show A Teacher touches on this topic specifically, and no, it's not ok lol.I personally believe that adults having sex with 15-year-olds, regardless of the sexes involved, is wrong. @Taser Confetti seems to think otherwise.
Boys who lose their virginity to older women almost always grow into defective men.
Example A: Emmanual Macron
That's what I said.It messes people up psychologically.
Yes. I was agreeing.That's what I said.
A bold statement, but one I must agree with.I personally believe that adults having sex with 15-year-olds, regardless of the sexes involved, is wrong.