ur_mom_lmaoooo
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Feb, 2026
I'm not asking if Christianity is compatible with aggressive racism (going to other people's countries/homelands and attacking them, usurping them, displacing them, and so forth on the basis of racial/ethnic superiority). I'm asking if Christianity is compatible with the idea that different ethnic/racial groups have their distinct homelands that they are entitled to, and that they have the right to dictate who is allowed to settle in their lands and gain access to their institutions, identities, cultures, media, infrastructure, resources, and labor (via taxpayer money), and under what terms, conditions, requirements, and restrictions foreigners are allowed to do so (up to and including not allowing any foreigner in regardless of intentions or qualifications if they so choose, for whatever arbitrary reason, because their right to their homeland and identity is absolute).
One of the biggest criticisms I've seen of Christianity (especially the Catholic Church) as of late is the idea that it explicitly rejects this and seemingly supports the exact opposite -- the endless mass settlement of hostile foreign populations into countries whose native populations have largely not consented to this, all on the argument that it is their Christian duty to sacrifice themselves, their economies, their homelands, and their cultures in order to house, clothe, feed, educate, and employ complete strangers from second- and third-world countries who do generally nothing but rape, loot, kill, subvert, marginalize, destroy, appropriate, vandalize, and generally defile and degrade Western Civilization and its peoples.
I guess this brings me back to my original question, which is do you think this is a fair and accurate accusation to make of Christianity? Or do you think that Christianity as an ideology is compatible with ethnonationalism and pan-ethnic/racial movements, and that the Christian groups supporting mass immigration and initiatives like DEI are subversive LARPers who don't actually follow Christian teachings? Or do think it's an issue specific to certain denominations, and that not all denominations have this problem?
(The major denominations people tend to bring up in this discussion are Protestantism, Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy, for the record.)
One of the biggest criticisms I've seen of Christianity (especially the Catholic Church) as of late is the idea that it explicitly rejects this and seemingly supports the exact opposite -- the endless mass settlement of hostile foreign populations into countries whose native populations have largely not consented to this, all on the argument that it is their Christian duty to sacrifice themselves, their economies, their homelands, and their cultures in order to house, clothe, feed, educate, and employ complete strangers from second- and third-world countries who do generally nothing but rape, loot, kill, subvert, marginalize, destroy, appropriate, vandalize, and generally defile and degrade Western Civilization and its peoples.
I guess this brings me back to my original question, which is do you think this is a fair and accurate accusation to make of Christianity? Or do you think that Christianity as an ideology is compatible with ethnonationalism and pan-ethnic/racial movements, and that the Christian groups supporting mass immigration and initiatives like DEI are subversive LARPers who don't actually follow Christian teachings? Or do think it's an issue specific to certain denominations, and that not all denominations have this problem?
(The major denominations people tend to bring up in this discussion are Protestantism, Catholicism, and Eastern Orthodoxy, for the record.)
Última edición: