Business Interest In NFTs And The Metaverse Is Falling Fast - Lol good: the article

Article (archive)

-Start-

960x0.jpg

Have you been seeing less NFT chatter around the internet lately? Hearing a bit less about the metaverse? Well, you’re not alone.

Despite an initial surge in usage of the buzzwords, interest in both concepts appears to be sharply declining, at least according to Google search trends, which have been seeing deep downward turns for both terms.

In the gaming space, where I operate, almost every major publisher seems to have been scared straight on NFTs after being lambasted by fans every time they are brought up, and those have become relegated mainly to purely blockchain based games outside the rest of the industry. As for the metaverse, the term has been repeated so much and so often it’s become almost meaningless, these days most often cited regarding blockchain-based shared worlds that have concurrent player averages outside the top 200-300 games on Steam at any given time.

960x0 (1).jpg

From the chart, you can see that interest in the metaverse as a term hit its peak when Facebook changed its name to Meta and started evangelizing about the digital future. But since then, the term has seen a decline in relevance as Facebook has not presented a coherent vision for the concept, nor have any of its blockchain-based competitors. Video games, many of which are already metaverse-adjacent, don’t really seem to care to call themselves that at all, even if games like Fortnite and Roblox are further down this road than anyone.

NFTs, meanwhile, peaked somewhere around the end of January, and have only dropped since. This should ward off the idea that the global breaking news of Russia invading Ukraine caused this drop in interest for this term and perhaps many others, as we can see this was already beginning to slide a month before the invasion even happened. It has been a smooth decline ever since, and shows no sign of slowing.

The same is not true for the entire space. Terms like crypto, blockchain, Ethereum and Bitcon may have had a huge surge back in the spring of last year, but now they’re relatively stable. Slight declines in a few, perhaps, but not the same level as what we’re seeing here with the metaverse and NFTs. “Web3” is on an arc more similar to NFTs, however.

960x0 (2).jpg

The blockchain and all it spawns may not be going anywhere, but all the predictions about NFTs being the inevitable future and the metaverse being the birth of web 2.0 feel…overblown, to say the least. I would not be surprised to see these concepts return later with new names to feel more fresh, but for the time being, interest in both are clearly waning, and I do wonder what happens to the millions of NFTs being held when the speculative market is no longer functioning as it once did at its peak. If we stay on this current path, we’re about to find out.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. Subscribe to my free weekly content round-up newsletter, God Rolls.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the
Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

-End-

Hard to really care about NFTs and the like with everything else happening right now. How long until NFTs, Blockchain, etc. just becomes another relic of this era?
 
Metaverse selling you the PS5 graphics:
Ver archivo adjunto 3073898

but Metaverse delivering the PS2 graphics:
Ver archivo adjunto 3073904
Do not insult the PS5; Playstation Home on PS3 looked better than that shit.

Didn't Sony try this? "Home" or something? I just remember all the hype and it flamed out in record time.
Yes, and it had a surprising amount of use; mainly girls looking for a more social aspect, with a lot of paid clothes/outfits/accessories/etc to buy. One thing I liked about it was certain games had content that was exclusive to Home if you met certain criteria. I remember Street Fighter 4 had a number of different t-shirts for your avatar for completing specific tasks in game (tracked via the trophy system).
 
The Metaverse kinda blew my mind when it was first unveiled and not in a good way. It was literally a shittier looking and heavily censored version of Second Life circa 2008 yet you had all these tech industry professionals going "wow so stunning and revolutionary!" I felt like I was having a stroke.
 
So when this crash and burns will Facebook change its name back or will it keep the name Meta even though it's a constant reminder of the failure this second rate second life.
Facebook changed their name to Meta because the "Facebook" brand was dangerous to democracy™️ and our children™️ or whatever. Apparently they also wanted to accost on NFTs' relevancy months back, but now that they are dying off, what will Meta change their name to now?
 
You mean taking four years to create a PG, normie palatable VR chat centered around the third rank VR hardware you Tim-Cook'd your way into "developing" and then doubling down by rebranding to focus on said Frankenstein project wasn't a good idea? No wonder Apple stays afloat, SV just ignores their failures.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo