Inflation is good, actually - You'll cowards don't even print money

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
then what? then foreign trade comes to a complete halt, economic activity in general dies, basically complete economic collapse, which leads to goods shortages that completely wreck peoples lives
No, foreign trade goes through the fucking roof. You can exchange one euro for six gorillion dollars, and then buy six gorillion dollar's worth of stuff. The US economy would set off like a rocketship on steroids. There are literally no downsides.
In practice, no.

1. Labour union contracts and other factors mean that wages are nominally flat. Sure, people lose their debt, but lots more people lose their livelihoods. This is actually why (small) inflation is generally good, as workers are devalued. Also its the largely rich who invest in land, gold, and other non-liquid assets, so no prole revolution for you.

2. Banks aren't blind to inflation. They'll adjust new loans/mortgages to predicted inflation rate. Obviously with a 10% higher interest, for inflation that isn't guaranteed to happen (probably won't), nobody's willing to buy stuff and the market crashes anyway.

also the 1940s inflation was helped by the nation-wide war effort increasing money velocity, a part of inflation, and the 1970s inflation was due to oil prices going up which obviously hampers activity
Banks are just selling off their assets to other parties. They don't have an incentive to "beat inflation", just to get returns on equity. There's no reason why bank spreads against the Fed would go up.

As for labor unions, as long as they can provide the same amount of value, there's no reason why wages wouldn't go up. Certainly, what we've seen recently is they've been going up a lot, not down.
 
i am getting increasingly disillusioned with capitalism and the right. clearly communism and the left do not work either.
this whole system of borrowing then repay with interest causing inflation is absurd. dont people realise that if prices go up while printing more money, that the money they have is worth less every day? are people that stupid? if there are 4 fishsticks in the world and you lend them out at a rate of 100% interest then get 8 fishsticks back, those 8 fishsticks are only worth 4 fishsticks. is the human population literally rain man?


http://blyad.club/lvm/zzzmemelife/capitalismandinflation.webm
 
Última edición:
No, foreign trade goes through the fucking roof. You can exchange one euro for six gorillion dollars, and then buy six gorillion dollar's worth of stuff. The US economy would set off like a rocketship on steroids. There are literally no downsides.
The US imports more than it exports. You've not taken the time to read up on anything before coming here with your gibberish ideas?
 
So basically, this?
t0zajmeqjrr71.png
 
2) If asset prices go down, the economy crashes, since people's (boomers') wealth is tied up in these assets, and the banks also have a stake in it through the mortgage market. If asset prices go down (or even stop going up), the boomers will have much less money to spend, which hurts the economy. Thus, asset prices have to go up.
This is your brain on Keynesian economics. Spending and consuming more shouldn't be the goal of an economy.
 
Inflation benefits the rich and banks (same thing) and screws over everyone else. Asset prices only HAVE to go up because of inflation. Imagine if you could save for retirement and know exactly how much you needed without having to rely on "stonks only go up" and "houses only go up" to even approach having a retirement strategy. You could just simply save what you know you needed. The value of your house doesn't have to increase because your house isn't your retirement plan, your retirement plan is sitting safely in a vault somewhere. No games, no ever increasing housing prices.

Who exactly loses here? Oh yeah it's literally just the banks, because the housing prices aren't increasing all the time people can simply save the money they need and buy the house without needing 30 year mortgages from the bank because the house prices aren't always increasing which happens people use them as an investment vehicle to beat inflation and as a retirement account instead of just a place to live. The bank is not earning millions of dollars on interest on the loans. Wall street isn't earning money on the many financial products they sell to people trying to beat inflation so they have money when they retire. All these predatory middlemen get cut out. That's why we "need" inflation.
 
Paul Krugman got a broken clock is right twice a day moment about inflation and he was bashed for this.
January 1, 2022

A leftist inflation-fighting idea so bad even Krugman couldn't take it​

By Monica Showalter

Economically illiterate leftists in university posts teaching economics have come up with the perfect solution to Joe Biden's raging inflation:
Price controls.
The kind that Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, the Chicoms, Zimbabwe, and the Soviets have done to turn their countries into communist paradises.
Such as this one, from a low-level wokester academic, spouting her 'wisdom' to millions of other leftists in the pages of the left-wing Guardian:

Even the Krugster, who's not a guy you'd like to take investment advice from when he's out championing Democrats over Economics 101, couldn't take it:

The screen shot:
Wow. That's reality. Because any economist worth his salt will tell you the same thing. Price controls don't work.

Despite his "wrong-way" career as an economic pundit, Krugman apparently still has residual standards as an economist.

It created a stir on Twitter and leftists had a cow. Then he went back to being Krugman the Democrat shill, deleting his tweet and apologizing for it, comically enough, in the name of civility. https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1477247341212184577

Krugman's never civil, he's famous for his rat-like nastiness to others, and this is probably first time he's ever used such a claim.

What more likely happened was that someone whispered into his ear that doddering Joe Biden was taking advice from someone who supports these bad and guaranteed-to-fail, price-control ideas. It's well known that Joe is desperate about the rising inflation situation in the U.S., with price of basic goods such as meat, bacon, gas, electricity, medicine, and bigger ticket items such as cars eating into consumer incomes. It's a tip-top issue with voters, and it's tanked the old fool's voter approval ratings which is the only thing about it that bothers him.

Worse still, it was brought on by his own money-press economics, running the fed's printing presses to pay for all of his giant government handouts and bureaucrat-hiring sprees. That's Joe's policy and he's sticking with it, so we know he's looking for some sort of quick fix to placate angry voters in time for the midterms. He may well be all in on price controls. We know his team has been denouncing "corporate profits" same as this economic subliterate has, writing in the pages of the Guardian. Who's she? This funny tweet tells her story:
 
Sorry for the bump and double posting but I saw this article about deflation next? I guess some dems wants the deflation right away to save some of their bacon for the upcoming Midterms.

Deflation Next? Will The Bullwhip Do The Fed's Job On Inflation​

BY TYLER DURDEN
TUESDAY, APR 12, 2022 - 07:30 AM
By Craig Fuller of FreightWaves,
The only thing surprising about the freight market slowdown is the speed at which it’s unfolding.

The supply chain “bullwhip effect” is both predictable and expected. The surge of inventories and declining freight costs/capacity imbalances will be deflationary.
The trucking market has slowed. Demand for trucks usually surges during the Spring, but this year, demand for truckload freight has broken out of this typical seasonal pattern.
Outbound Tender Volume Index (OTVI) is an index which measures the volume of truckload order requests in the contract truckload market. The OTVI chart shows year over year activity from 2018 to this year.
The bullwhip effect is something every supply chain 101 student learns about – the idea that upstream providers overproduce in reaction to a one-time demand shock.

What is the bullwhip effect?

According to the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply, the bullwhip effect “is defined as the demand distortion that travels upstream in the supply chain from the retailer through to the wholesaler and manufacturer due to the variance of orders which may be larger than that of sales.”
The best way to think of this in terms of COVID is that in the early part of the cycle, the Federal Reserve was pouring trillions of dollars into the economy to ensure that the market didn’t collapse. Consumers went out and spent all of that money on physical goods. At the same time, production in China and the U.S. was shut down or limited. The combination – stimulating consumption but limiting production – caused the American consumer to burn through almost all inventory.
Retailers ordered more goods based on the inflated demand at that time. Upstream to them, wholesalers and manufacturers did the same. Along that chain some even ordered bumper stock.
When the orders didn’t arrive as planned, they ordered more. And upstream to them, vendors also ordered more for the same reason. As orders flowed upstream, everyone started to produce at unprecedented levels.
Consumers, flush with excess cash and bullish due to high employment and a roaring economy, continued to order physical goods. Then the products started flowing, and in spite of delays, they poured in.
Earlier this year, consumers pulled back… at first just slightly. But all of those products kept pouring in, along with buffer stock. Warehouse inventories piled up. And now consumers have shifted away from consuming physical products and have started to consume services and experiences once again. Meanwhile, all of that inventory keeps coming.
And now we can see those goods in market data. Here is a chart of real retail inventories, excluding new or used autos. Because inventories are counted on the basis of their dollar value, rapid inflation can make inventories appear artificially higher, so remember that these numbers have been deflated by the Consumer Price Index, or CPI. In other words, inflation has been stripped out to reflect ‘true’ growth in inventory volume, not just price.

And as goods flow into our economy, there is nowhere to transport them. Warehouses are full and spending on goods has stalled as Americans suddenly have more options. So freight demand has slowed.

Inventory at very high levels

FreightWaves’ editorial and research staff, as well as its Market Experts, are constantly conducting channel checks. Lately, we are hearing that national big box retailers have plenty of inventory, particularly in large discretionary categories, such as furniture and household goods.
On Twitter, where the freight markets are suddenly becoming a trendy topic of discussion in conjunction with economic activity, there is a suggestion that other large consumer categories are seeing a sudden slowdown as well.
Used cars have been nearly impossible to come by and have experienced unmatched price inflation for the past two years. This could be changing.
Meanwhile, used vehicles experienced the biggest drop in prices in two years.

The CEO of a chain of used car dealerships has a blog that discusses the used car trends for the general public. On Twitter, he talks about market conditions frequently. On April 9th, he posted:

This was followed by Quant researcher Steve Hou, who posted:

Lumber prices are also coming down, after two years of inflated prices and extremely tight supply. In the past month, lumber commodity prices have dropped from $1,252 to $949 per-thousand-board-feet, a 30% decline.

A shift by consumers to services

Higher energy and food prices likely shocked the consumer into a spending pullback on physical goods – while retailers were desperately rebuilding inventories – at the same time that consumers finally began to shift spending away from physical goods to services. And without demand, you don’t need to move anything quickly.
Shippers feel much less urgency and therefore they are slowing the freight velocity of their supply chains. We can see that in volume shifts between the modes of transportation they’re using. Railroads move products slower, including intermodal (containerized freight on the rails). It’s currently 21% cheaper to move a container of freight on intermodal than it is via a truck (door-to-door) – an all-time savings high.
Chart: Cost delta percentage intermodal vs. truck
The chart below displays volume trends in intermodal and truckload. Intermodal is holding its own, while truck volumes are slowing.
Chart: 53-ft. containers on rail vs. truckload volumes
This is all good for consumers – prices for freight will come down. Supply chain bottlenecks will ease. What were recently inventory shortages are now gluts, and will likely result in price discounts, not increases. This is a late-stage supply chain correction.
The trucking industry, particularly small trucking firms, will end up feeling the pain. But this was inevitable. A freight recession happens far more often than a GDP recession. The last time this happened was 2019, when the freight market experienced a downturn, but the broader economy did not.
I think a freight recession is inevitable and I think that inflation has to cool. It was either going to be the Federal Reserve’s job to do so or the market’s to do so. We can thank the supply chain bullwhip for doing the Federal Reserve’s job.
China’s latest round of system-wide shutdowns may be the final straw that pushes many supply chain executives in America to reevaluate their sourcing strategy (if they haven’t already). China is becoming far too unpredictable and unstable as a supplier. Importers should take this breather to catch up.
There is still lots to be bullish about. The “bullwhip correction” will be a different kind of headache than we’ve had to deal with for the past two years, but the good news is the market is correcting and things are “normalizing” – as least as far as supply chains are concerned.
Want to track the same data and get an edge on competitors in the market? SONAR’s high-frequency platform tracks global supply chain activity in real-time, with the freshest perspective on the global upstream economy.
 
i like some of his ideas but i believe in certain nationalised industries, power, comms, water, transport etc because commercial operations have proven insufficient. infrastructure should not run on a business model of profit and efficiency but reliability and efficiency. when the nation depends on an industry to survive, that, and only that is where national or federal governments should have control.
i do agree that all military spending overseas is bad, only a defence force and local police need to exist. 90% of government should be on the village level
 
Atrás
Top Abajo