Indefinite hospital order for mum who killed son

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g3l0l4pl7o
Credit: David Grundy & Maria Cassidy, BBC News
Archive: https://archive.ph/Wvtj2

99.webp

Karolina Zurawska has been subjected to an indefinite hospital order for killing her six-year-old son
A mum with paranoid schizophrenia who killed her six-year-old son while believing she was being "instructed by a demonic force" has been given an indefinite hospital order.

Karolina Zurawska, 42, admitted the manslaughter of Aleksander Zurawski on the grounds of diminished responsibility, as well as the attempted murder of her 67-year-old father, Krzysztof Siwy.

Aleksander, who attended Whitestone Primary School, was killed at the family home on Cwm Du Close, Gendros, Swansea, on 29 August 2024.

The court heard Zurawska had previously been the "best mother" to her son, who was recovering from a brain tumour which left him partially sighted and requiring a cane to walk.

Judge Paul Thomas KC told Swansea Crown Court he was imposing the order not as punishment, but for "ongoing, probably lifelong, medical help".

"The often overused word tragic does not begin to reflect the awfulness of what happened on that day to Alex," the judge said.

"You adored each other and he trusted you."

Swansea Crown Court heard Zurawska killed Aleksander by using a hand saw to try and cut off his head.

The court heard it was the unanimous view of three very experienced consultant forensic psychiatrists that she was suffering a psychotic episode of paranoid schizophrenia at the time.

"It affected your mental state so greatly that it impacted your ability to understand what you were doing," said Judge Thomas.

"You were suffering from the delusion of hearing voices and you believe you were being instructed by a demonic force.

"You are not a wicked mother, far from it.

"You are a lady whose mental state deteriorated, I suspect under the overwhelming weight of your concern and care for Aleksander."

An inquest into the boy's death heard he was found by police officers with a "significant neck injury".

Det Insp David Butt from South Wales Police said paramedics and police officers were called to a property at Cwm Du Close on 29 August following concerns of people living nearby.

Officers discovered "a young child with a significant injury to his neck area and... blood loss", DI Butt added.

He said Zurawska was arrested at the property on suspicion of murder.

Det Insp Butt said a post-mortem examination was undertaken at the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff where the cause of death was found to be a "complex sharp force injury to the neck area".

f5dac890-21c7-11f0-b072-7bcc2f1fa000.png.webp

Aleksander was a kind, helpful and clever boy, his family said

On the day of the incident, Mr Siwy drove to the house, as he was concerned about his daughter, where she continued to act out of character, sitting on the hallway floor and speaking little.

Zurawska told her father that she needed to kill him, and tried to attack him with a knife.

Disarming Zurawska, Mr Siwy sat in his car where he spoke to his other daughter.

He and his daughter were concerned that reporting Zurawska for the attack would see Aleksander taken away and neither believed "whatsoever that she would harm Aleksander".

Zurawska came out of the house and attempted to attack her father again - in total, she attempted to stab her father three times.

Mr Siwy tried to take Aleksander with him but Zurawaska would not let him.

After driving home, Mr Siwy spoke to his daughter in Poland again, who urged him to return to Zurawska.

On the way to his daughter, he was overtaken by several police cars. Having heard the sound of screams, neighbours had called the police and Aleksander was found next to his mother.

On Friday, the judge told Zurawska: "Even if you do recover from this mental illness, the burden of what happened will always be with you."

He made a hospital order under the Mental Health Act and told Zurawska she would not be released from specialist psychiatric care "unless it is safe".

Det Ch Insp Matthew Davies said the case had a "profound effect" on the Gendros community.

In a tribute issued by South Wales Police, Aleksander's family described him as a "very kind child".

"He loved playing with his little sister and playing with his dog, Daisy," they added.

"Aleksander was always well-behaved and never naughty."

They added he was "very clever and mature for his age" and spoke in both English and Polish, "often correcting his parents with their English if they got words wrong".

Bethan Peterson, headteacher of Whitestone Primary School, called Aleksander "a delightful, determined little boy".

She said both staff and pupils were "devastated" by his death, adding that he had been "extremely loved and popular amongst his peers, staff and all who knew him".
 
Since when did being schizophrenic became an get out of jail free card?
The standard in the US is that if you're incapable of perceiving that what you're doing is wrong at the time you commit the crime, you can't be prosecuted for it. They can hospitalize you for the safety of the community and your personal health, but that isn't a punishment in and of itself, strictly speaking.

I don't know if schizophrenia qualifies under that standard.

It's totally possible under the US legal system to outright behead someone and after some period in a crazy house, be released 100% scot free.

I would imagine Bongland has a similar legal philosophy rattling around somewhere. But someone more knowledgeable can correct me on that.
 
The court heard Zurawska had previously been the "best mother" to her son, who was recovering from a brain tumour which left him partially sighted and requiring a cane to walk.

So the 6 year old overcame a fucking brain tumor and then got murdered by his own mother but pls don't call the mother wicked bc voices in her head.

I hate this fucking world.
 
At the very least she should be spayed so she has no chance of another innocent child coming under her care.
 
They can hospitalize you for the safety of the community and your personal health, but that isn't a punishment in and of itself, strictly speaking
But it's kind of is a punishment in the sense that you'll have not much of anything to do while you're in the nuthouse. Granted, it's slightly better than prison,except that your stay is "indefinite" instead of whatever the judge says
 
But it's kind of is a punishment in the sense that you'll have not much of anything to do while you're in the nuthouse. Granted, it's slightly better than prison,except that your stay is "indefinite" instead of whatever the judge says
Yeah, it's kind of a spergy metaphorical debate about the distinction, but it does exist for a real reason. The state has an undisputed right to impose a punishment in response to a duly executed criminal trial and there's limitations on what they're allowed to do, for how long, and you have statutorily defined rights to appeal. Likewise, psychological confinement has limitations and due process rights.

The two might seem pretty easy to conflate and I'm sympathetic to the concept that being thrown in a hole for a decade is faggy regardless of the the legalistic justification for why. Still the only way that that a country of 330 million people functions even the tiniest bit is is because we've got these paper processes laid out.
 
The standard in the US is that if you're incapable of perceiving that what you're doing is wrong at the time you commit the crime, you can't be prosecuted for it. They can hospitalize you for the safety of the community and your personal health, but that isn't a punishment in and of itself, strictly speaking.

I don't know if schizophrenia qualifies under that standard.

It's totally possible under the US legal system to outright behead someone and after some period in a crazy house, be released 100% scot free.

I would imagine Bongland has a similar legal philosophy rattling around somewhere. But someone more knowledgeable can correct me on that.
You are correct. In layman's terms, she has not been found guilty of any charges but had admitted to carrying out the criminal act libeled while legitimately unable to discern bad from good due to severe mental illness. The court has available to it the option of detention in a mental health facility at that point. I'd probably rather be in prison.

This is a very high bar to reach in English law, most diminished responsibility pleas are knocked back and put before a jury to decide and they usually decide that the accused knew exactly what they were doing. The Crown accepting this plea makes me fairly confident she was actually genuinely mental.
 
I wonder if this will work for Troons?

'Your Honour, you can't arrest me, I'm female and identify as pregnant...'

'No, you're just a fat bloke wearing a bra...'

*INTENSE AUTISTIC SCREECHING*
 
Since when did being schizophrenic became an get out of jail free card?
Since decades ago. It gets alot of people off the hook for shit they should get life or the chair for and makes people far more difficult to prosecute even when they are blatantly guilty and its obvious they know it

Lucas werner is a prime example. Cops won't touch him despite being reported for provable pedo behavior hundreds of times involving kids at least as young as 15 by his own admission, he harassed people at his college to the point at least one female student not only quit school but left the country after being told he had multiple complaints against him but they couldn't do shit about it unless he got to the point of attacking someone cause of his mental health issues (bipolar schizophrenic) despite a documented history of criminal behavior and a domestic violence conviction

That said, indefinite my ass. That never happens for these kinds of loons. She'll be in there for a few years at most, then certified as sane enough and quietly released like they always are

Hitman One dijo:
This is a very high bar to reach in English law, most diminished responsibility pleas are knocked back and put before a jury to decide and they usually decide that the accused knew exactly what they were doing. The Crown accepting this plea makes me fairly confident she was actually genuinely mental.
Considering the history of the UK courts I wouldn't put too much faith in her being that nuts. They go for all kinds of bullshit these days
 
>Adult woman kills male child
>Not really punished for it
>"She's just a mum innit"

Board feminists, your thoughts?
I think the overwhelming majority of persons detained in England and Wales on hospital orders following criminal procedure are male. I think the crime of murder in English common law requires the mens rea of intent, and I think since M'Naghten in 1843 it has been well established that severe mental illness, particularly of psychotic and delusional nature, prevents the formation of the necessary mens rea. I think ooking like a lobotomised macaque about the correct procedural application of the English criminal law 'to own the wahmen' is a bad look, young soldier. The criminal law of all developed legal systems has procedures and precedents for how to deal with the defendant too deranged to be held fully criminally responsible.

I also think the loss of this young boy's life is an unmitigated tragedy, and the psychological punishment this woman will endure, if she is ever successfully brought back to an understanding of what she has done, is truly nightmarish. I think using the corpse of a little boy as ammunition in A&N's retarded forever War On Wahmen is in incredibly poor taste, and I think after sober reflection you won't be especially proud of doing this.
 
Última edición:
You are correct. In layman's terms, she has not been found guilty of any charges but had admitted to carrying out the criminal act libeled while legitimately unable to discern bad from good due to severe mental illness. The court has available to it the option of detention in a mental health facility at that point. I'd probably rather be in prison.

This is a very high bar to reach in English law, most diminished responsibility pleas are knocked back and put before a jury to decide and they usually decide that the accused knew exactly what they were doing. The Crown accepting this plea makes me fairly confident she was actually genuinely mental.
That's my intuition.

I'm OK that the state has this option because truly batshit people do genuinely exist.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo