Ughubughughughughughghlug
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Mayo, 2019
Today's topic is the Wilmington "massacre" of 1898, also called the Wilmington coup, also called the Wilmington insurrection, when Jim Crow went and overthrew a Fusion government in North Carolina's largest city.
This is interesting, because it's been blown up in the public conscious in the same way the Tulsa Race Massacre was. Those of you that have been around a while (which is most of you) know that I have a pointed interest in America's history of insurrections, none of which (besides the slavery-related ones, which are the gayest, most pathetic ones) get talked about at all. The way we remember rebellions is also very biased. I happen to have a particular interest in the Battle of Blair Mountain, which I feel in its full context is very pertinent to modern issues, but also the Battle of Athens, which was is especially important for the modern day.
In general, what do you hear about? White people terrorizing Blacks. What do you not hear about? Numerous occasions of Whites and Blacks siding to kill the rich cocksuckers terrorizing both of them.
Now, what makes Wilmington notable is that they LOVE to call it "the only successful coup in American history." The problem? The so-called coup involved a mob of over 2000 fucking people.
In other words, it's a revolution.
This is the same gay shit they do with January 6. Even if a thing is an insurrection (Jan 6 wasn't, Wilmington was), when an insurrection draws from the masses at large, THAT'S A FUCKING REVOLUTION. COUPS. ARE. MILITARY. POLICE. THE GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY ITSELF. A coup is THE GOVERNMENT overthrowing THE GOVERNMENT. Not THE PEOPLE overthrowing THE GOVERNMENT. A coup, in this case, would be the city police arresting the municipal government and installing a new municipal government. Not a 2000-strong mob.
You'd think, too, that Leftists would be able to acknowledge that a thing can be a revolution and also be bad - we haven't started calling it the Texas Coup, after all, and they hate that - but in this case the drive to virtue-signal everywhere has raped the English language. At best, you could say that Wilmington might be a putsch, a word that we do not use in English except for THE putsch we all know and love, an act of insurrection that is coup-like in that it represents a narrow faction acting decisively to topple the government through the means of a coup, but is still drawn from mass violence and not elite insider conspiracy.
Fuck this gay Earth
This is interesting, because it's been blown up in the public conscious in the same way the Tulsa Race Massacre was. Those of you that have been around a while (which is most of you) know that I have a pointed interest in America's history of insurrections, none of which (besides the slavery-related ones, which are the gayest, most pathetic ones) get talked about at all. The way we remember rebellions is also very biased. I happen to have a particular interest in the Battle of Blair Mountain, which I feel in its full context is very pertinent to modern issues, but also the Battle of Athens, which was is especially important for the modern day.
In general, what do you hear about? White people terrorizing Blacks. What do you not hear about? Numerous occasions of Whites and Blacks siding to kill the rich cocksuckers terrorizing both of them.
Now, what makes Wilmington notable is that they LOVE to call it "the only successful coup in American history." The problem? The so-called coup involved a mob of over 2000 fucking people.
In other words, it's a revolution.
This is the same gay shit they do with January 6. Even if a thing is an insurrection (Jan 6 wasn't, Wilmington was), when an insurrection draws from the masses at large, THAT'S A FUCKING REVOLUTION. COUPS. ARE. MILITARY. POLICE. THE GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY ITSELF. A coup is THE GOVERNMENT overthrowing THE GOVERNMENT. Not THE PEOPLE overthrowing THE GOVERNMENT. A coup, in this case, would be the city police arresting the municipal government and installing a new municipal government. Not a 2000-strong mob.
You'd think, too, that Leftists would be able to acknowledge that a thing can be a revolution and also be bad - we haven't started calling it the Texas Coup, after all, and they hate that - but in this case the drive to virtue-signal everywhere has raped the English language. At best, you could say that Wilmington might be a putsch, a word that we do not use in English except for THE putsch we all know and love, an act of insurrection that is coup-like in that it represents a narrow faction acting decisively to topple the government through the means of a coup, but is still drawn from mass violence and not elite insider conspiracy.
Fuck this gay Earth
Última edición:
