- Registrado
- 9 de Oct, 2013
Sweet reminds me of a character from Mann's Doctor Faustus, Dr. Chaim Breisacher, although the latter is much more learned:Life imitates art.
Chapter XXVIII dijo:The most contemptuous word on his lips was the word "progress"; he had an annihilating way of pronouncing it; and one felt that the conservative scorn which he devoted to the idea was regarded by himself as the true legitimation of his presence in this society, the mark of his fitness for it.
The narrator goes on to describe Breisacher's atavistic tastes, among which:
- Art that does not represent perspective is not less advanced than that which does. In fact, "Rejection, renunciation, disdain were not incapacity, nor uninstructedness, nor evidence of poverty. As though illusion were not the cheapest principle in art, the most suited to the mob[...]"
- "Biblical personages—revered by every Christian child—King David, King Solomon, and the prophets drivelling about dear God in heaven, these were already the debased representatives of an exploded late theology[...]"
- "'Prayer [...] is the vulgarized and rationalistically watered-down late form of something very vital, active and strong: the magic invocation, the coercion of God.'"
But a sensitive man does not like to disturb another; it is unpleasant to break in on a train of thought with logical or historical objections; even in the anti-intellectual such a man respects and spares the intellectual. Today we see, of course, that it was the mistake of our civilization to have practised all too magnanimously this respect and forbearance. For we found after all that the opposite side met us with sheer impudence and the most determined intolerance.