🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
More whimpering and whining on his last journal entry, in response to being told that he has to go out and get things rather than waiting for them to come to him:
Defeatist Baby dijo:
But that is showing ambition, and I was taught in The System that that was bad. Any time I've ever tried to push forward and grab more than the people in charge thought I should have-- The Herald, my relationship with Ashleigh, the small engine shop, the doll shop-- I've been punished and lost everything. So I simply gave up.
You know, if you took a drink every time Sweet uses "that's how I was taught in Teh Systim!" as an excuse for his idiotic behavior, you'd be slap-ass drunk in about five minutes flat (and still more lucid than Sweet on a good day).

He's also lying out his leaky, flatulent ass, because he hasn't "given up" on any of these things - he's still angrily writing letters and trying to stalk the people who wronged him in a desperate bid to regain entrance to ASU and access to the delicious perks that lay therein. Typical Sweetian doubletalk.
 
Sweet, getting punished for ambition is not having your hand slapped for overstepping your bounds.

Have you heard the expression "give someone an inch and they'll take a mile"? Have you misconstrued it to be your handbook on life? You aren'the supposed to grab, you are supposed to earn.

You have never "shown ambition", you've only been a selfish person trying get away with "grabbing" more than you have earned.
 
Última edición:
One has to wonder what he thinks the "State" in "Arkansas State University" means. Like, does he think it just conveniently happens to be located within the boundaries of a state? And given the whole mission of a state university, how does he think he's going to be able to wipe it off the map? I mean, he can take his copy of a map of Arkansas and literally grind an eraser into the general ASU zone, I suppose.

The one thing he's slightly, vaguely, sort of correct about is that in some backwaters, and/or some parts of human history before it was discovered that seizure disorders (not all of which are epilepsy, as Lurker discovered -- hope this is all resolved with a simple meds adjustment!) were not caused by demonic possession, there was a certain amount of fear and misinformation surrounding such disorders. My grandparents on one side signed a marriage license that made both parties swear that neither one was "insane" or "a lunatic" or epileptic. Of course, while I forget the actual year of their marriage, both grandparents on that side were born in 1908. The possession and mental weakness theories got tossed out sometime between then and now, at least in parts of the world where current scientific theory is accepted. Of course, the one sneering at Lurker's medical problem is the same guy who probably thinks cars are a progressive conspiracy because at least you don't have to rotate the tires on a horse, so I doubt very much his knowledge of medicine is much further advanced than the wording on a c. 1928 marriage license.

I also don't get why "gang thugs" would be, in any universe, hanging out by a jogging track waiting to murder fitness enthusiasts instead of (a) patrolling their territory or (b) engaging in money-making activities. Joggers notoriously carry little more than keys, ID, maybe pepper spray if there are big dogs around, and perhaps one of those items so very much prized by Sweets -- a water bottle. I mean, I could be wrong and maybe in East Bumfuck, Arkansas, there is in fact a thriving black market in used pedometers. But you'd think, since we're talking about a university-owned jogging track, that after the third athlete turned up with a nasty headache and without their 4-gig iPod Shuffle, the campus cops would, you know, investigate. Universities depend on attracting continued business, and parents don't want to send their kids to a dangerous environment in which the jogging track is literally unusable, or some freak is threatening everyone who has been on the newspaper staff since half past 1997.
 
Rather than mock Sweets in full, I'm just gonna translate it into reality.

Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
But that is showing ambition,
Translation: I don't want to work,
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
and I was taught in The System
Translation: and through this bunkum theory that I got from the college's system of campuses and my own autism-
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
that that was bad.
Translation: I have ruined my life forever.
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
Any time I've ever tried to push forward
Translation: Any time I've been given a chance, sometimes forcefully, by people-
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
and grab more than the people in charge thought I should have--
Translation: I lost it by acting like a raging entitled douchebag.
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
Translation: The Herald, an unpaid position that is supposed to be a stepping stone to real journalism, especially since I have the degree needed to get a job in that field right now;
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
my relationship with Ashleigh
Translation: my nonexistent relationship with a troll who called me out of bile fascination and a person I've only physically met once;
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
the small engine shop
Translation: Dale's shop, where I didn't want to do my work, delusionally thought I was the manager, and refused to learn how to handle the devices in said shop;
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
Translation: the doll shop that never happened and was solely on my mother's hands and I just wanted the apartment due to being a strawman liberal.
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
I've been punished and lost everything.
Translation: I fucked up everything I touched in spite of all the chances I was given.
Fictional Sweet Talk dijo:
So I simply gave up.
Translation: So I simply maintained a twenty year grudge that involves uselessly writing letters that get thrown into the fireplace without being read. I will die alone and unloved.

That's better.:reality:
 
In the past, I've said that Jon is dishonest. Well, I'll have to amend that, now. Jon Sweet doesn't merely obscure or duck around the truth.

Jon Sweet is a liar, and "The System" is the biggest horse apple he's picked up and gleefully chewed on.

I used to think that his idiotic "That's how they taught us ... in The System" was nothing more than the typical, catchphrase-styled nonsense you'd usually hear coming out of an autistic bumblebrain who didn't understand how to communicate with adults of functional intelligence, but then I realized today that it is that phrase in particular that puts the lie to Jon's statements about ASU, and his life since.

Key words of the catchphrase (#3 before the seemingly retired "Hmm?") that shows his mendacious behavior are "we," "taught," and, of course, "The System." The concepts represented in these four words alone betray Jon for the liar that he is, as they illustrate perfectly that he is talking about a conspiracy that not only is unprovable, but one he knows to be false.

Let's start with "we." This is one of the first, most damning elements of Jon's statements about "The System," has he has yet to show any evidence at all that this alleged conspiracy affected anyone else but him. He cannot bring forward any other male that had a girlfriend assigned to him, nor any female who had been assigned to a male. He cannot provide any conversations he's had with other guys in the dorms who had even seen "Ashleigh," let alone had any experiences on the chinaphone. He has not maintained contact with a single one of his former coworkers at The Herald, who could've admitted or denied participation in the conspiracy. There are absolutely no witnesses to this massive, campus-wide monstrosity that controlled Jon's life, so when he talks about it, he's only talking about himself alone. Implying that anyone else was affected by "The System" is a lie.

Then we move on to "taught." "Taught" is, of course, the past tense of "teach," which, according to Oxford Dictionary, means "Impart knowledge to or instruct (someone) as to how to do something." The use of this word in referring to his revelations of life at ASU is a lie. In order to be taught, someone would've had to sat Jon down and instructed him on how things worked. Certainly, while one can learn through experience, according to Jon, that didn't happen. He has painted a picture, multiple times, of a plucky college kid, blissfully unaware that anything bad was going on. Jon didn't start talking about "The System" until after he'd been kicked out of college, to my understanding. This means that he wasn't "taught" anything at all; rather, Jon had inferred the existence of "The System" after the fact. In other words, he just made it up in reaction to his only sense of agency (mistaken as it may have been) having been revoked.

Finally, we come to "The System" itself. This is the ultimate lie, the big one. You may be wondering how it is that any of this is a 'lie' to begin with, as opposed to the result of poor reasoning skills. I say that Jon is lying because there have been far too many times where he has admitted to his actions, and even implied that his behavior was bad. Whether this was a result of his memory being too poor for him to maintain his defense, or if he was being genuinely honest (shyah, right!), Jon realizes that his behavior was unacceptable. No fictional "System" would be necessary for him to get the boot; the rules and bylaws of the university would be enough. Jon, however, being a pile of skin-sheathed gelatin and insecurity, could not tolerate the fact that, once again, someone had easily kicked his ass. After all, this wasn't like when Jon normally got his face rearranged - this one had consequences. All of those wonderful perks were ripped away from him, and he had to return to the sad nightmare that was his life.

Thus, "The System" was born. It was a means of Jon coming up with a villain in order to make himself look better, true, but it also gave him a peak to try and climb to. If ASU simply kicked him out, then it was done and he was out, that's that. But if there was some terrible evil for him to battle, then he was done wrong and could overcome that evil, escaping the Sweet household and getting back to those life-affirming perks that a bottom-feeder like himself would crave so much.

The problem is that Jon isn't smart. He isn't creative or rational, either. So, when he talks about "The System", he does so in very vague terms. When describing it, he's never given us any real specifics about how it works, who's running it, or why. When put to the test, it simply falls apart. Not only are there no other witnesses or victims, as mentioned above, but now that he has admitted that "Ashleigh" was a troll, he has essentially torpedoed the whole "System-provided girl" lunacy. When he asks why no one told him about what was truly going on, the simplest explanation is the most likely: The perpetually friendless man who nobody likes and actively beats up, ignores, or makes fun of to this very day, wasn't very likable back when he was a college student. Nobody talked to him because nobody wanted anything to do with him other than to poke fun.

"The System," as Jon has described it, is ambiguous, amorphous, and completely without any logical roots in reality. It is nothing more than a falsehood Jon uses to cover up his terrible behavior in the past, and to explain his social and intellectual uselessness to this day, saying that he was "taught" how to be a feckless cretin in college, as if grown adults can't get past what they learn in university.

So, there you have it. Jon is a liar, and "The System" is one of the biggest fibs of all.

In closing, let me just state that, one day, Jon Sweet's welfare is going to be cancelled. He'll have to eat the corpses of his pets just to keep from starving.
 
Última edición:
Y'know, if Sweets is so knowledgeable about this goddamn System, why doesn't he try to work against it?

(Something something System indoctrination response.)
 
The fun thing is he screams that he doesn't even know the rules, so he can't even define the system. But then he goes into diatribes about how it totally worked at the same time. He also both simultaneously admitted Ashlaaay was a troll but was also real. He's a dishonest charlatan as well as obscenely incompetent.

Jon in a nutshell:
Jonny.png
 
Hey, @AJMLurker ? You remember what his house looks like, right? Photos can be provided.
The hilarious part is, and I want to make this very VERY clear for our inbred pedophilic thumb-faced mentally deficient hero, if I really really wanted to, I could easily roll up on Blytheville to make his life miserable for that rant of his about blacks and epileptics from the other day. Sweet, your address can be very easily found and I'm dead serious here. All I would need to do is use the Farms search feature or do some googling on "Jonathan M. Sweet" and within minutes, have your location. Hey dipshit, you were the one who provided us with all the information from years of powerleveling about your joke of a life online. You also provided us with pictures of your hovel too.

Luckily, unlike you, I'm not a violent psychopath that flies off the handle over the littlest things. Also, I got far better things to do than go track down some retarded manchild that has already had the shit kicked out of him by life. The fact that normal people have lives to live is the sole reason why you haven't paid yet for all the criminal nonsense you spew online on a daily basis. Despite what your deteriorating mind is thinking, I'm not threatening you right now, just warning you that there could be consequences in the future for what you say online. I'm a very chill person and the fact that you brought me to a point where I'm borderline threatening you, well, you are a piece of work Jonathan M. Sweet. Alright, you be a good boy now Jonny. Is Kim Possible on? She will make everything better for you.

Now, I will end this post with a picture that will haunt your dreams tonight:
carltonboo.png


P.S. From what I can gather, Dr. Merk lives faaaar closer to Blytheville than I do and the fact he hasn't shown up on your doorstep yet, despite the constant threats you throw his way, shows that you're completely unimportant in the grand scheme of things Jonny.

P.S.S. I no longer live in Glennville, GA Sweetness. Don't bother to ask your mommy to drive you there so you can decapitate me with your 8-inch bone knife. Also, don't bother responding to this post with "Hey Turkey-Lurkey, if you showed up to my house with your jigaboo friends, I would gut you with my 8-inch bone knife!" Dude, even without backup, I would easily smack that stupid fucking knife out of your hand and proceed to bash in your mutant looking face with my fists. A girl scout could disarm your silly ass.

P.S.S.S. Sorry for the a-loggy nature of this post fellow Kiwis. Just making a point for our Sweetian Hero. Keep up the good work guys.
Trump would be proud. :trump:
 
Última edición:
I mentioned earlier that the whole "Ashleigh" thing is something my little brothers might have done. This is kinda off of what we are talking about now but it has been on my mind. Now, I don't think any of his story happened but allow me to submit an entirely speculative version of events if it did. I think I am allowed that considering who we are talking about.

A young boy(s) overhear a university age sibling, or a friend of one, talking about the freak at their school. An idea arises. "Hey school paper, I'd like to get a hold of one of your writers, does he have any contact information?". Fill in your own story of how anyone could have easily got Sweet's number. Call him up, prepubescent boy voice sounds like a girl, cue the poop back and forth forever scene from You and Me and Everyone We Know. The boy (s) enjoy the trolling. "Let's meet!" Set it up.

Sweet goes to meet, no one shows up, no one was ever going to come. Assumes it is because of his clothes. Gets another troll call from "Ashleigh" (you need to wait for phone calls, those are the 'rules', right Sweet? Not that you are being led along by someone who doesn't want their mom to get a call asking for someone who doesn't exist.) Anyways...

Sweet proceeds to beg for China citing his late father in the process. Boy(s) get freaked out, mention they are underage, tell him to fuck off. Sweet still assumes 'Ashleigh' is, for the most part, who 'she' says 'she' is.

This is the key for me that if anything did happen Sweet was being fucked over by a little boy. He has angrily spoke about calling 'Ashleigh's' father and his frustration at his refusal to 'admit' he has a daughter. Though I don't think any sane person who knows who Sweet is would tell him they had a daughter, if any sliver of his story is true this is the one I believe in part. Not that 'Ashleigh's' father was trying to hide he has a daughter, but that he doesn't have one.

Boys trolling someone they heard big brother talk about, a boy who while visiting a friend's house overheard the older sister talking about the weirdo in her class.

Teen boys in the 90's convincing autistic man children they are hot to trot women. That doesn't sound familiar at all.

I am very curious about Sweet's views on this interpretation.
 
Última edición:
@AJMLurker and @Dr. Merkwurdichliebe, if you need a place to hide out while planning the campaign against the Bone-knife Terror Of Blytheville, my door is always open. Should Sweet somehow find his way here, he will find that my dwelling is well-fortified to withstand an assault from a mentally-stunted fat guy with a cheap knife. Also, the constabulary in my locale tend to take reports of an armed assailant screaming threats seriously. Sweet would be detained in short order, and since he's from out of state, I suspect the judge would deny bail, given that he already has warrants out for non-appearance.
 
Última edición:
Teen boys in the 90's convincing autistic man children they are hot to trot women.
Interesting take on the story.

Sweet has claimed to have met "Ashleigh" in person. While wearing flip-over shades, purple pants, a cap full of novelty pins and buttons, and a jacket from his father. Sweet used his father's then recent passing to try and score. She nope'd right out of there. Sweet has been trying to stalk her get closure since.

Speaking of fashion, in a recent pic Sweet uploaded, one can see that Sweet still wears what appears to be Cub Scout paraphernalia in a hat. Like in the college picture.
 
Última edición:
Interesting take on the story.

Sweet has claimed to have met "Ashleigh" in person. While wearing flip-over shades, purple pants, a cap full of novelty pins and buttons, and a jacket from his father. Sweet used his father's then recent passing to try and score. She nope'd right out of there. Sweet has been trying to stalk her get closure since.

Speaking of fashion, in a recent pic Sweet uploaded, one can see that Sweet still wears what appears to be Cub Scout paraphernalia in a hat. Like in the college picture.
I know that claim, but every time he tells the story of him showing up in his getup and bringing up his father's death they have little connection other than 'and'.

He hasn't made the details of the conversation he had 'in person' with 'Ashleigh' public to my knowledge. If I believe he went out to meet someone who contacted him via chinaphone I completely believe he went out in a ridiculous outfit which could include his father's jacket. However, I don'the believe he met anyone. I believe he screamed at his troll upon the next call that 'she' ditched him while he 'WAS WEARING [HIS] DEAD FATHER'S JACKET' like a grade-A crazy person.

Sweet, no one TOLD him you were wearing your dead father's jacket to the meeting.
 
Última edición:
Interesting theory about the teen boy trolling. The woman he claims is "Ashleigh" has a brother around her age.

It's a more believable story than the one that Sweet is trying to pass off. You're a dumb teen trying to pull a Clyde Cash when suddenly your target is going off about his late father after being stood up once. Sweet's CC gets freaked out, tells him off. Sweet begins calling the house and the dad answers. What kid would ever tell their dad 'ya, I was fucking with a guy and it turns out he might be insane and a threat'? Dad only knows some fucking guy is demanding to speak to someone who doesn't exist. Instead of explaining like a human being that he was being contacted by someone from this number Sweet decided the dad is in on it.

If anything in Sweet's story happened this is what I think is most likely. Imagine a father when they hear their underaged daughter has been calling a university age man to have phone sex, to troll or not. Imagine a father when he gets a call that his underage son has been contacting a university age man for phone sex, trolling or not. Now imagine a call to a father where you demand to speak to a child he doesn't have.

Which is most likely to have the response 'I don't have a daughter'? Which most likely involve an ass whooping of the kid?
 
Última edición:
@CatFace, I fully buy your theory. In fact, I'm making it my new headcanon now. Really, what girl, no matter how plain looking, would be willing to troll a batshit insane assclown like Sweet for months on end?

Now bored teen boys who were informed of the local assclown of ASU by an older college-aged sibling or friend? I can see that.
 
I can buy it simply because Chris fell for the same shit, and Jon has proven to be even more incompetent than he is. So yeah, let's add "fell for teenage boy trolling him as a girl" to the list of him being a stupider and more redneck Chris.
 
Sheesh. Jon has really lost it.

This is the bit in his DA journal where he brings up the "X Factor":

The town girls at A-State only go out with college men. I have spent years trying to isolate and reproduce the X factor that makes this so, but without actually being right there, it's difficult to study closely. It's some strange perfect storm of geography (the school is 15 miles away from the per capita v.d. capital of the U.S.), a loose moral fiber, and the relaxed political atmosphere of 1996-97. We'll have another Clinton in the Presidential race next year, and the window is rapidly closing. I have to move quickly or lose my golden opportunity.

So, going by this statement, the X factor would be the defining element that causes "town girls" (the hell that means) to exclusively date ASU college attendees who are male. Got it? Okay.

@DrChristianTroy responded:

The "X factor" that makes college aged women want to go out with college guys? That's called being in the same age range. They aren't going to go out with a 40 year old, balding manbaby because you're 20 years older than them. Looking like you are a sex offender just seals the deal.

DocTroy basically restates Jon's explanation of the "X factor" word for word, and refutes it simply and masterfully. A child could understand where he's coming from. Cut-and-dried. Easy to understand. Nearly impossible to misinterpret, right?

But noooooooooooooooooo-

No, the "x factor" is what allows a twenty-something angry journalist/ crazed ex-fan/ demented prospective roommate (or whatever your story is now, you clam-heads keep changing it. like the soup of the day) to ask a 15-year-old townie girl, who they may or may not be dating, to solicit someone they're mad at, and she does it without question.

It's ... what? Jon just said what it was in the response above, then denies it just one response later. And why? Obviously, DocTroy had spanked his behind. Jon is very much like a squid who squirts invisible ink in order to escape his enemies. He can't make a solid point without getting busted, so he scrambles to change the subject. We can see right through what he's doing, however, so it doesn't work.

And here's the kicker... no one says one bad word about it.I get yelled at and called "Grand Dragon" by Doc Murky

Once again, Jon uses the term "I get yelled at" when referring to our comments about him. We do not yell at him. We cannot yell at him, as far as I know, as none of us are within yelling distance. What Sweet is demonstrating here, though it's likely unintentional, is that he is afraid of the things we say. If he truly felt above us and our criticisms, name-calling, etc., he wouldn't care about what we had to say at all. Our sentiments clearly affect him in a negative way, obviously causing him some kind of anguish or emotional pain.

Keep up the good work, Kiwis!

because I contacted my heretofore unseen phantom roommate's superiors and asked them where I might find him to discuss the matter, and he got fired/shuffled off to another department because of it. It wasn't even a racial thing. I never even knew he was black.

This is one of the most demented word salads I've ever seen him chop up. The "heretofore unseen phantom roommate" would be the roommate he himself said that he had in college. Specifically, he had written that "Ashleigh" had called for his roommate, who wasn't in, so she talked to Jon instead.

We brought up Jon's roommate specifically because Jon had said that he had a roommate.

I'd have done the same damn thing to a white person who may have information about my ex.


Jon didn't have an ex. Jon admitted "Ashleigh" was a troll.

JON SWEET NEVER HAD A GIRLFRIEND.


Why don't you get mad at his former department at the college over their apparent cover-up? What are they hiding?

More croutons for the word salad. What in the world is he talking about? There was no cover-up hinted at or explained, and is in no way "apparent," nor is there any reasonable argument put forth that anyone is hiding anything, nor evidence presented at anyone was fired/transferred/turned into a newt or whatever. Again, this is what happens when Jon is beaten in an argument. He panics and does everything to distract from the point as best he can. And just like with his comics, his writing, his perception of other people, and his fashion sense, his best sucks.
 
Última edición:
Since Sweet's views on certain things are read-only, it looks like malfunctions are caused when they're directly challenged.

It's kind of like trying to write a file to a CD ROM, only instead of error messages, you get word salads.
 
Última edición:
Since Sweet's views on certain things are read-only, it looks like malfunctions are caused when they're directly challenged.

It's kind of like trying to write a file to a CD ROM, only instead of error messages, you get word salads.

Yeah, exactly. For example, let's look at this line again:

No, the "x factor" is what allows a twenty-something angry journalist/ crazed ex-fan/ demented prospective roommate (or whatever your story is now, you clam-heads keep changing it. like the soup of the day)

The only person - the only person - to suggest Jon was being accosted by "a crazed ex-fan or angry journalist" was Jon Sweet. None of us ever, ever suggested those ideas. We didn't suggest them, he did.

Jon is blaming us for a crazy idea that he himself came up with. What a clam-head!


Seems like that CD has a scratch on it, Tori.
 
It never occurs to Sweet that our story "keeps changing" because we're all different people who have different theories about the truth behind his stories. Of course, this makes sense, since Sweet's autism makes it impossible for him to understand that we're not in fact some kind of illithid hive-mind.

Sweet, here's a little bit of information for you: we have different ideas and stories because they're funny. We suggest them because we are laughing at you. We are laughing at you because you are a joke. You, Jonathan Sweet, are a walking, er... living, uh, no... um... arguably sentient(?) punchline.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo