- Registrado
- 10 de Feb, 2015
Miley may be 23 now, but Sweet specifically mentioned buying her Disney movies from before she lost her morals.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Got more suggestions:Things Sweet believes
And apparently, incandescent light bulbs make good bug zappers.Sweet dijo:TV ratings, which have done more to destroy lives, cost jobs, and rob Americans of their freedom than any other law to come down the pike in a decade[...]
And apparently, incandescent light bulbs make good bug zappers.
"the plumber who criticized Obama"
Is he talking about "Joe the Plumber"? I guess no one told Sweet that the dude's name isn't "Joe" and he's, wait for it, not a plumber. This is coming from someone who wanted to be a journalist, a profession that involves fact-checking?
Earlier in this thread, someone posted Mr. Sweet's infamous TV ratings column. Pretty much everything he wrote about the history of movie ratings was factually incorrect. He was too lazy to do any research at all and just pulled the "facts" out of his ass.
Here we go, courtesy of He Sets Me On Fire:
TV RATING SYSTEM
In the beginning it was ratings for movies. It started with the basics: G for general audiences, PG meant that parents had to accompany their kids to the theaters, R meant that anyone under sixteen was not admitted, and X, of course, meant strictly adult.
Where to start?
Error 1: PG was not part of the original ("in the beginning") ratings system.
Error 2: When the PG rating was introduced, it did not mean that those under 16 had to be accompanied by a parent; it meant that parental guidance was recommended. (Gremlins was rated PG, for cryin' out loud.)
Errors 3 and 4: R did not mean that "anyone under 16 was not admitted"; it meant that those under 17 could see the movie if they were accompanied by a parent.
Error 5: X did not men "strictly adult." Those who were 17 -- and neither "strictly" nor legally adults --could attend X-rated films.
So, in the first two sentences of his most famous column ever, Mr. Sweet had five major factual errors. If only his career hadn't been derailed by the Liberal/Progressive Conspiracy™, there's no telling how far he would have gone in journalism.
Sweet still gives one about us. We're pretty much the only people on the internet he talks to nowadays.People still give a fuck about Iconoclast?
I guess it's the only way he can get anyone to pay attention to him.Sweet still gives one about us. We're pretty much the only people on the internet he talks to nowadays.
I guess it's the only way he can anyone to pay attention to him.
![]()
Damn, that's edgy as fuck! I'm going to drop out of this thread, I'm scared for my safety.Based on the fact that he's threatening to track us down, torture us to death, decapitate us and put our heads of pikes in his back yard, I'm guessing that he isn't really enjoying the attention.
That comic looks like one of those positive thinking affirmations.[Sweetish Affirmation]
Duke Leto Atreides dijo:[A] person needs new experiences. They jar something deep inside, allowing him to grow. Without change something sleeps inside us, and seldom awakens. The sleeper must awaken.
....my mind works in strange ways.
I just finished up the pencils on another story, but the coloring will have to wait until I get the connector pin for the electrical cable readjusted so I can charge the battery on my laptop. Sure, you can fix it yourself, according to some Internet tutorial@, but honestly I don't trust those things. 90% of those videos are patent bullshit. Either I'll slip up while dicking around with the port and electrocute myself,
See, this is why older computers will always, always, always be superior this newer, "easier to use" technology. These late-nineties models are like tanks-- not pretty, not streamlined, but got-dang it, they were built to last. They are reliable old workhorses that wouldn't be taken out by a little piece of metal less than a centimeter long getting a few degrees off-kilter.
the parts look a little shabby and need to be fixed or replaced more often
The only accurate part of that statement.
Ah, so a win/win for everybody.
Followed by:
Make up your mind, Jon.
Oh, and in response to the whole "Everything I want will come to me" statement, I'm guessing that what you ultimately want is to spend your final days unloved, unwanted, and desperately lacking food and shelter.
Because you're going to die alone and poor.
Also, Sweet's belief that older computers are sturdier than new systems is, no surprise, wrong. Newer machines are engineered to be more durable than their older counterparts, and they're far more energy efficient and with the new OSes, they're more reliable overall. But no computer, no matter how well designed, can withstand being tossed about or pulled to the floor by tripping over the cord. Laptops, by their very nature, are more fragile than desktops (which is what Sweet's ancient computer is, if I recall correctly).