🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
# 121 : "Jon Writes His Own Ticket"
Jon wins an award for a short fiction piece he wrote, so the gang travels to scenic Vermont, home of the Pynchloaf Writer's Conference, for him to accept it. However, when Angela sees what the story is about, her feelings of jealously may drive an omnibus-sized wedge between the young couple. Meanwhile, back home a new team of bumbling superheroes deal with threats to the city.
Want to know how Jon fails at storytelling? The fact he came up with a self-insert to be the star of his comic.

If you need to make yourself, literally yourself, be the star of a comic, you fail at storytelling. You know Sweet Bro, if you wanted people to be touched by your life story and invested in your struggle, you could of found millions way to do it... but you're J.M. Sweet so you couldn't. You absolutely fail with your struggle and shitty drawn comic. You can't appeal to anyone whatsoever with your work.
 
My first thought when I saw the childishly half-witted Super Bowl cover was: Where did he steal the background photos? It only took a couple of minutes to determine that the shot of the field is a copyrighted image that Sweet either stole from www.imagesource.com or from one of Image Source's clients who paid to use the photo. (Click on the link and search for "American football field.") The image is also available from Getty for prices ranging from $50 at the smallest size (518 x 330 pixels) to $525 for the largest version (which is about the size Sweet is using in violation of the law). He is saving himself quite a bit of coin -- and effort -- by stealing other people's work . . . again.

We already know that Sweet thinks he can plagiarize as long as he maintains that the source material doesn't exist. How long before he denies that the image exists and claims that he took the photo? Does he know that DeviantArt has a policy against stealing copyrighted work and posting it on their site? Is he worried that someone might rat him out?

Also below is the original of the stolen image of the stands Sweet uses -- quite ineptly -- in the background . Notice how his unique combination of laziness and incompetence results in the yard markers on the stands not lining up with those on the field? The goal line on the stands lines up with the 35 yard line on the field. And you see those yard markers (the hash marks, not the long lines) that Sweet has running in front of the stands? They are at the center of a real football field -- two rows of them set at or slightly wider than the width of the goal posts -- not on the sidelines. The goal posts standing at the 35 yard line instead of in the end zone are also a nice touch. As usual, everything that could be wrong in his work is wrong.

o-FOOTBALL-FIELD-facebook.jpg

High%2BSchool%2BFootball%2BField.JPG
 
Última edición:
It takes an astounding measure of conceit and narcissism to portray yourself so unabashedly like that.

Given Sweets's level of talent, ability, and professionalism though, all I can do is snicker at the thought.
 
It takes an astounding measure of conceit and narcissism to portray yourself so unabashedly like that.

Plus, it's pure fantasy as well. Here we see Jon portray himself as successful, popular, the object of a brokenhearted woman's affection, and having a defined jawline. In other words, completely unrealistic.
 
If you need to make yourself, literally yourself, be the star of a comic, you fail at storytelling.
I think self-inserts can work -- like in The Divine Comedy for example -- but it seems that Sweet may not know how to make them work. Probably because he doesn't have a college aged assistant to tell him how.

I was going to see if Sweet really did commit fraud. No photo credits = apparent deliberate plagiarism with Sweet reposting that photo to dA. Even if stick figures or who-knows-what are slapped on it. And it appears that Sweet committed copyright infringement anyway by doing that. But alas, he has no sweetheart from the ground-up assistant to inform him of that.

Also, Sweet didn't have a hip young assistant to tell him there's free photos on Wikimedia Commons where the photographers give permission -- although one still typically has to (and probably should anyway) give credit when reposting them. Once again, "bad boy of college journalism," my ass.
 
Última edición:
New upload: https://archive.is/2pThE

This time he explains that he leaves spider webs alone because da libruhls ban on incandescent light bulbs.

Some have noticed the profusion of spiderwebs all about my house in photos and wondered why there are so many. The simple answer: I need them.

You see, in 2007 Congress, in its infinite wisdom, passed laws to phase out the production and sale of incandescent light bulbs in the United States@. Other nations, like Canada and the European Union started getting on the ball about the same time. Cuba stated their bulb bans a full two years earlier (that's very telling). These laws, dubbed light-bulb socialism" by some, called for manufacturers to begin equipping their plants to produce and distribute compact florescent lights-- those little "curly-noodle" bulbs instead.

Besides questions of mercury levels in the CFLs (because no one can seem to quite agree on how much is toxic) and the danger they may present if broken, the level of light they give off is pitiful in comparison to incandescent lights. I'm told that the low levels of illumination you see in my room may be contributing to my gradually worsening eyesight- -well, that's why. Our government won't allow us real light bulbs because of piddling "environmental concerns".

The new bulbs also don't give off as much heat, which supposedly saves a few dollars in our light bills -- but the old bulbs served another function besides lighting a room: they killed the mosquitoes. I miss the days I can turn on my reading lamp for a few hours before bed, leave it burning awhile, and come back to see a pile of dead 'skeeters lying on top of my desk, fried by the white-hot heat of sixty watts of pure burning fury. I can't stand smelly sprays and citronella candle are a fire hazard, so at night, once it falls dark, the little bloodsuckers make a meal of me. I can't sleep most nights for the biting, so I sit awake, huddled before my lamp with its pitiful little CFL heart, and curse that toxic little abomination burning weakly within. If not for all these sticky webs to catch the little pests, I'd be bitten from head to toe, and spend July and August as an itching, pus-filled mess of welts.

I've been looking for a dodge to get around this not-so-bright idea by our government. In issue #121, a subplot involves two characters driving up to Canada where, thanks to a loophole in the law, thousands of boxes of incandescent lights sit deep in the snowy bosom of our neighbor to the North, stockpiled within rumored secret warehouses, just waiting for some enterprising soul to sneak them over the border. I've also heard that five years ago in Germany a couple of brothers tried to get around the law by labeling a shipment of incandescent bulbs as"heatballs@"-- for use in poultry farms and home heating lamps-- and smuggled a cache of them out of the country. Those two crazy krauts almost got away with it too-- they unloaded about 4,000 units, had back orders for ten times that, and were in the middle of making a second run when customs caught up with them.

So I'm thinking, why not do something like that here? A lot of my neighbors have converted chicken coops that they uses as storage sheds. Does the coop actually have to have active laying hens in it? There must be loopholes galore in that German law for us good ol' boys to roundly exploit. Simply toss a couple of chickens in your tool shed, call yourself an egg farm, and get a special hotball waiver from Obama. The government will give youall the incandescent bulbs you want, and you can toss out (properly, of course, because, you know, mercury) those socialist CFLs. Fry mosquitos under the unforgiving heat of Edison's brainchild to your heart's content, and give Charlotte@ and her spinning sisters the rest of the summer off.

Although, I'll admit, come Halloween, those webs hanging in the foyer do look pretty cool and spooky.
Get a fucking bug zapper.
 
[facepalm] Again with the "real lightbulbs are bug zappers" thing.

Anyway, US laws still allow incandescent light bulbs to be produced and distributed as specialty bulbs and/or in certain wattage. Also, Sweet seems sadistically gleeful to a disturbing level in describing the agonizing deaths of countless bugs.
 
Última edición:
Sweet Bro is whinging about a law passed by Congress in 2007. Wasn't that back before Presidente Barack Hussein Obama the Kenyan Imam ruined America forever? Could it have been during the "benign, almost fatherly" oversight of Dubya?
 
Get a fucking bug zapper.
When Jon responds to this a few weeks down the road, he'll have an excuse for why he can't do that. You can expect a children's cartoon show will be involved. Also expect lots and lots of rationalizing for why the spider webs and black mold are good for him.

Only progressive fear spider webs and black mold.
 
Holy shit.

Hey, Sweets. A couple weeks back, I had a bit of a fly problem myself because I didn't notice there was a hole in the screen of my window, and when I went to check there were literally dozens of flies and other types of bugs on my window, which was particularly concerning for me because my bed is literally right next to my window.

Y'know what I did about it?

20151029_181337 - Copy.jpg


Cost about $10. Picked it up at the Target about a five minute's walk away from my apartment. You're welcome.
 
I also liked that post because of the animu stuff.

When Jon responds to this a few weeks down the road[...]
I predict that Sweet will claim that we propose unworkable solutions and erroneously think we're stupid compared to him. Remember, he can't drive and Mama Sweet controls his money.

I'm also reminded of earlier in this thread when Sweet posted replies here -- he'd respond to every proposed solution to his problems with some reason why they're unworkable to him.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo