Hunter S Thompson's death to be reviewed 20 years on - Thompson was known for his 1971 novel Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrqpqe81qjo
Credit: BBC News
Archive: https://archive.ph/RnbO3

89a49fb0-9ed7-11f0-9cc3-55b0375a170c.jpg.webp

Colorado officials are reviewing the death of journalist Hunter S Thompson, 20 years after it was ruled a suicide, at the request of his widow.

Thompson died at the age of 67 at his home in Woody Creek, Colorado, a small town north of Aspen, in February 2005.

The Colorado Bureau of Investigation said on Tuesday that it was conducting a "case review" of the 2005 investigation into his death, though the agency said this was not as a result of new evidence.

"By bringing in an outside agency for a fresh look, we hope to provide a definitive and transparent review that may offer peace of mind to his family and the public," Colorado Sheriff Michael Buglione said.

He added that Thompson had had a "profound impact" on his community and beyond.

Thompson was a renowned writer and journalist who wrote for dozens of outlets including Rolling Stone, Playboy, and ESPN.

His 1971 novel, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas - a semi-autobiographical story about the counterculture of the 1960s - was later adapted into a film starring Johnny Depp.

Other books he penned include Hells Angels and Generation of Swine.

Colorado officials said they did not have a timeline for the investigation into Thompson's death and would provide an update once it was complete.

Thompson died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound while speaking on the phone with his wife.

His son later found his body in the kitchen, according to news reports.

An investigation into his death found no evidence of foul play.
 
He was old and had recently broken his arm. Probably figured it was a good time to go. What’s the point of this?
Maybe the widow just wanted to get his name out there again, I am sure it will generate some kind of boost in revenue somehow.
 
What is there to review? He was on the phone with his wife when he suck started a gun. It wasn't like he was found in Marcy Park with two rounds to the back of his head, his gun under his body, and his briefcase missing and still ruled a suicide.
 
By sheer coincidence I read about the circumstances of his death only a couple months ago after watching the film adaption.

Bizarre decision considering how clear cut it seemed. Is the widow implying a family member offed him ?
 
They literally say why they are doing it in the article. They often bring in outside agencies to review everything for a fresh set of eyes to see if they missed anything, to show to the public they are being transparent and trustworthy. The only reason it is noteworthy this time is because it regards a famous person. That's all.
 
They literally say why they are doing it in the article. They often bring in outside agencies to review everything for a fresh set of eyes to see if they missed anything, to show to the public they are being transparent and trustworthy. The only reason it is noteworthy this time is because it regards a famous person. That's all.
So does that mean somewhere in California there’s someone getting paid to review the Manson Murders in case they missed something?

Because that seems kind of a waste of taxpayer money.
 
Bizarre decision considering how clear cut it seemed. Is the widow implying a family member offed him ?
I think the family would imply the then young widow did it given how hard she has milked his name, fame and estate for every drop she could. His son is a good man, his widow was a fame hungry harpie.
 
I think the family would imply the then young widow did it given how hard she has milked his name, fame and estate for every drop she could. His son is a good man, his widow was a fame hungry harpie.
Considering she was at the Aspen Club when he did himself and his son Juan and his family were in the house at the time, it's more likely Juan killed his father than his stepmom was able to do the deed.
 
They literally say why they are doing it in the article. They often bring in outside agencies to review everything for a fresh set of eyes to see if they missed anything, to show to the public they are being transparent and trustworthy. The only reason it is noteworthy this time is because it regards a famous person. That's all.
I want Sylvia Plath reexamined.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo