How Do We Reclaim Wikipedia

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
Saddam Hussain Obama

Saddam Hussain Obama

Man In The Box
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
4 de Ago, 2023
Sorry for making so many threads today, but this has really bothered me for awhile. Wikipedia's bias has been confirmed by several YouTubers, but basically, Wikipedia is misinforming a generation of people who go to Google for answers and has been used to deplatform and slander the left's opponents while pretending to be neutral. How do we retake Wikipedia?
 
Solución
WhiskeyJack
Leftists/trannies/autistic terminally-online nutjobs/etc are easily atomized because they obsess on jumping on the latest fad "victimhood" trope, and they all want to have the last word in every argument. So you want to create wedge issues that will divide them and cause them to attack each other. Similar to the whole TERF thing where feminists are splitting off from troon-pushing leftists.

Create a Wiki account, start various social media accounts claiming to be a transgender zoomer far-leftist commie being sure to constantly link back to your edits on Wikipedia, demanding praise for your amazing edits. Make sure to start off being as accurate as possible with your edits for a few months, in order to look legitimate, and focus on...
Ordenar por fecha Ordenar por votos
AgendaPoster dijo:
People with political power shape social narratives
You wanna shape narratives, achieve political power and social primacy
You wanna be apolitical, have fun, and enjoy being used as a drone that new gayops are tested upon
Presiona para expandir...
Im thinking we try vordraks proposed method from back in the day of infiltrating with apolitical accounts then voting the leftists out
 
Voto positivo 0 Voto negativo
information is always biased. who, what, when, where and why are all needed in information. only way to get rid of that would be to explain everything except the "why" which would make the information useless or lead to even more retarded narratives. the only way to solve that is to offer different interpretations of "why" which is something that wikipedia typically doesn't allow in its current form.

the best way right now would be for someone to follow the elon musk playbook and buy wikimedia group and make comprehensive policy changes on presenting differing viewpoints. doing so would scare off the eunuchs trying to use wikipedia as a propaganda machine
 
Voto positivo 0 Voto negativo
Mirror and subvert it. Steal all the work on Wikipedia, install your own mods, present it as a more honest alternative. Ideally you'd have one version moderated better, and one version that's more open to contributions (so it will be permanently vandalized, but it attracts the vandals away from your curated site).

If you can figure out the bandwidth costs, you'll attract an audience of people who know to distrust Wikipedia but don't know where else to start.
 
Voto positivo 0 Voto negativo
Harvey Danger dijo:
Mirror and subvert it. Steal all the work on Wikipedia, install your own mods, present it as a more honest alternative. Ideally you'd have one version moderated better, and one version that's more open to contributions (so it will be permanently vandalized, but it attracts the vandals away from your curated site).

If you can figure out the bandwidth costs, you'll attract an audience of people who know to distrust Wikipedia but don't know where else to start.
Presiona para expandir...
this is a great idea as all of wikipedias content is creative commons i might try this some day
 
Voto positivo 0 Voto negativo
Leftists/trannies/autistic terminally-online nutjobs/etc are easily atomized because they obsess on jumping on the latest fad "victimhood" trope, and they all want to have the last word in every argument. So you want to create wedge issues that will divide them and cause them to attack each other. Similar to the whole TERF thing where feminists are splitting off from troon-pushing leftists.

Create a Wiki account, start various social media accounts claiming to be a transgender zoomer far-leftist commie being sure to constantly link back to your edits on Wikipedia, demanding praise for your amazing edits. Make sure to start off being as accurate as possible with your edits for a few months, in order to look legitimate, and focus on non-political articles, like MCU pop-culture type crap. Then start subtly pushing in wedge-issues on lefty articles, like shoehorning in trans-racial rights in articles about racial issues, adding in "proper" pronouns in every article you can being as annoying about it as possible, start meaningless arguments over why you replaced every reference to "handicapped" on FDR's page with "wheelchair-adjacent American", and so on.

The key is to get the autistic nutjobs that edit Wiki articles to spend more and more time fighting each other. This eats up their time and energy and diminishes their ability to thought-police other areas of the site. Tying everything you do on Wikipedia to your other social media accounts just helps to spread the fighting over a wider area and drags in more people to start yet more fights. The key to avoid them defeating you is to always, always go farther Left in your rhetoric and always be sincere. They'll instinctively try to go even farther to the Left to beat you, which ultimately just further alienates them from normies. Wikipedia dies when normies move on to something else, like how Google/Bing/etc search is dying off because now the normies just always add "Reddit" to their searches. Eventually they'll cut out the middle man entirely.
 
Voto positivo 1 Voto negativo
Solución
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo