High school science fair project questioning African American intelligence sparks outrage

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article199440204.html

Students, parents and staff at C.K. McClatchy High School are upset over a science fair project by a student in its elite magnet program that questioned whether certain races of people lack the intelligence to handle the program's academically challenging coursework.

Some of those outraged by the racially charged project say it points to a larger problem: the lack of ethnic diversity in the school's elite HISP program.


The project that started the controversy was titled "Race and IQ." It raised the hypothesis: "If the average IQs of blacks, Southeast Asians, and Hispanics are lower than the average IQs of non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians, then the racial disproportionality in (HISP) is justified."

The project was put on display with others on Monday afternoon to be judged by a team of community members as part of the fourth annual Mini Science Fair. It was removed Wednesday morning after students, parents and staff complained. The science fair was open to students and parents.

The controversial project also included a bibliography and quotes from five books, one a text from 1904 called "The Essential Kafir" that argued South African blacks were intellectually inferior to whites. The term "kaffir" has since evolved into a racial slur in South Africa, where it is sometimes referred to as the "k-word."

"I think that a lot of people, especially of color, are really hurt and upset by this," said Chrysanthe Vidal, a senior in the HISP program.

She said the student who prepared the report has a history of making racist remarks in class. He is described by peers as a boy of Asian descent and a participant in the accelerated Humanities and International Studies program, or HISP. The Sacramento Bee did not speak to the student and is not identifying the minor.

The HISP program is designed to promote cultural awareness and sensitivity. Often, it includes alternative viewpoints on history. For example, one HISP student said that while learning about Christopher Columbus, students also learned about "the Indian genocide" and the perspective of Native Americans on white settlers.

The program currently has 508 students enrolled, including 12 African American students, 80 Hispanic students and 104 who are Asian, according to data provided by the district.

"We've clearly not progressed as much as the students want to think we have," said one freshman in HISP. "It's just kind of shocking to think someone could enter into that program knowing that is what we are learning about and being so closed-minded."

The idea of race being tied to intelligence has a long and controversial history and is considered fringe. It is associated with other ideas including eugenics - often euphemistically referred to as "human biodiversity" in recent years - that attempt to tie racial superiority to science.

In the United States, the notion of a racial tie to intelligence gained notoriety with "The Bell Curve." The 1994 book by political scientist Charles Murray brought the idea into the national consciousness, though it has been widely criticized by mainstream scientists.

Many notions involving ethnicity and ability are popular with the so-called alternative right movement, and have gained increased prominence recently as topics of race and immigration have dominated national rhetoric. In 2013, the then-director of the Heritage Foundation - a leading conservative voice for immigration reform - resigned over his Harvard Ph.D. dissertation, which argued among other things that American born "Hispanics" are less intelligent than American-born white people, also using IQ scores as a marker.

Recently, some academics argued that President Donald Trump was alluding to race and intelligence when he questioned why American immigration policy should allow people from certain African, Caribbean and Central American countries to come to the United States instead of people from countries like Norway.

The McClatchy student tested his race and intelligence hypothesis by having a handful of unidentified teens of various races take an online intelligence test.

His report concluded that, "the lower average IQs of blacks, Southeast Asians, and nonwhite Hispanics means that they are not as likely as non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians to be accepted into a more academically rigorous program such as HISP. Therefore, the racial disproportionality of HISP is justified."

Sacramento Unified school district spokesman Alex Barrios said the district was aware of the controversy and is looking into the matter. He said that while the district understood the project was offensive to some, it may not have violated policy if the question fell within the guidelines of the assignment.

"We are looking into the appropriate response to a situation like this," said Barrios. "We understand it concerns a lot of people and doesn't reflect our culture here."

Barrios couldn't say whether the science teacher saw the project before it was put on display. He said district officials are looking into the issue to better understand what happened.

On Thursday, students were posting comments about the project on social media sites and bringing concerns to administrators.

Principal Peter Lambert also Thursday sent an email message to parents. "I want to be clear that at McClatchy High School we promote and embrace an inclusive environment and way of thinking which excludes any form of discrimination," he wrote. "Many of you have asked me what our school is doing in response to this incident. I want you to know we are taking this incident very seriously and we will be reviewing the incident and implementing all measures as appropriate to provide a safe and inclusive environment for all of our students."

Lambert, who is African American, met with his staff to further discuss the project Friday morning.

Vidal, who said she is one of four African American students in her senior class, said the incident reflects an undercurrent of racism at the school, although she hasn't experienced blatant racism.

Students at the school who aren't in the HISP program see it as a closed culture made up mostly of white and Asian students, Vidal said. "They don't feel they can talk to us," she said.

Students in the program have similar economic backgrounds and belief systems, creating an echo chamber, she and other HISP students said. HISP students don't get the insight of people of color or from lower socio-economic backgrounds.

One HISP student interviewed by The Sacramento Bee said the program is challenging and has "great" teachers, but is separated from the general population of the school and not racially diverse.

"My HISP class, I don't think we have a single African American person in my class, which is kind of shocking consider HISP's big deal is cultural expression," the student said. "We have very little interaction with anyone outside our classes. I definitely think we would benefit at some level to being exposed to a community outside our circle."

Joyce Brown, an adviser to the Black Student Union at the school, arrived Thursday after the project had been taken down, but was still able to view it.

Brown said Thursday night she received a call from an African American student at McClatchy who said the incident made her feel "unsafe and uneasy."

"These kids should not feel that way," said Brown.
 
East Asians count as white for those purposes so I think he's still fucked.

He's going to be fine. He's a minor, he didn't commit a crime, and even if his classmates remember this for another year or two, who cares? They don't determine his future. If he keeps doing forward thinking projects like this, there's no stopping this kid.
 
My favorite part of the article is the kid's a chink so instead of calling him a racist white nationalist Nazi they have to say his project "sparked outrage" instead.

That must really piss them off.
 
I think we all wish we could have had this kid's edginess when making science fair projects, instead of whatever we had to pull out of our ass at the time.
 
Suppose the IQ differences are partly or wholly environmental? In that case we could actually fix it, or at least do something about it.
You mean like teaching better agricultural and nutritional practices, helping people reduce the impact of toxins such as lead or pesticides, generally improving education and so forth? Too much work!
 
they're givin this future incel too much credit by getting outraged, the race/intelligence debacle is beyond retarded. They should have laughed at his (I have zero doubt) half-asian-by-mum face. Adopted children prove that if given the right education and a safe healthy environment people will grow a good healthy mind
 
I strongly believe in academic freedom. The student should be able to research what he wants provided he won't intentionally harm others or limit another person's right to academic freedom. Ideas should be debated, not censored, as it only vindicates terrible ideas. The Race and IQ debate is looked down upon as it directs the conversation to horrifying ideas like eugenics and racism. It's why people against these notions should debate these ideas. Maybe with enough persuasion and counter-research, a reasonable solution can be made to appease both sides without violating the rights and freedoms of others.
 
I strongly believe in academic freedom. The student should be able to research what he wants provided he won't intentionally harm others or limit another person's right to academic freedom. Ideas should be debated, not censored, as it only vindicates terrible ideas. The Race and IQ debate is looked down upon as it directs the conversation to horrifying ideas like eugenics and racism. It's why people against these notions should debate these ideas. Maybe with enough persuasion and counter-research, a reasonable solution can be made to appease both sides without violating the rights and freedoms of others.

They won't allow the research because they know to some extent it's true and they can't have that. The average IQ in Somalia is 68, that's a fact and the reason they won't allow debate is because then they'd be forced to accept that as such.
 
Ideas should be debated, not censored, as it only vindicates terrible ideas. The Race and IQ debate is looked down upon as it directs the conversation to horrifying ideas like eugenics and racism.

It's also almost invariable that most "studies" on the issue are agenda-pushing one way or the other. It's pretty much a third rail and anyone touching it is assumed to have ill intent (and often actually do).

They won't allow the research because they know to some extent it's true and they can't have that. The average IQ in Somalia is 68, that's a fact and the reason they won't allow debate is because then they'd be forced to accept that as such.

It probably has a lot to do with Somalia being a complete shithole. If you miss developmental thresholds as a child you never really catch up again, and Somalia is not a stimulating environment. If you're raised in Somalia odds are you're malnourished, you live in a shitty home environment, and it's literally not even a country at this point.

Dysfunctional (or outright nonfunctional) societies raise dysfunctional (or outright nonfunctional) people.
 
I strongly believe in academic freedom. The student should be able to research what he wants provided he won't intentionally harm others or limit another person's right to academic freedom. Ideas should be debated, not censored, as it only vindicates terrible ideas.
But whenever people bring this up, they always cry that even talking about this kind of thing will stigmatize and hurt the POCs and any other "oppressed" group. And then you get put on the back foot and any trying to rebuttel from that they'll say you don't care about minorities and there safety and that your immoral. Then at the end of the day we're all back where we started.
 
But whenever people bring this up, they always cry that even talking about this kind of thing will stigmatize and hurt the POCs and any other "oppressed" group. And then you get put on the back foot and any trying to rebuttel from that they'll say you don't care about minorities and there safety and that your immoral. Then at the end of the day we're all back where we started.
And that's okay in my eyes, as the people should be able to speak their views as well as you. If their view is truly dumb, it will show,
 
Real talk: isn't this a flawed experiment from the get go? I don't know if these programs require exams but if they do, they're going to want to study as much as possible and take it seriously. He gave them an online quiz which most people aren't going to give a shit about if they did poorly.
 
Suppose the IQ differences are partly or wholly environmental? In that case we could actually fix it, or at least do something about it.

I strongly believe in academic freedom. The student should be able to research what he wants provided he won't intentionally harm others or limit another person's right to academic freedom. Ideas should be debated, not censored, as it only vindicates terrible ideas. The Race and IQ debate is looked down upon as it directs the conversation to horrifying ideas like eugenics and racism. It's why people against these notions should debate these ideas. Maybe with enough persuasion and counter-research, a reasonable solution can be made to appease both sides without violating the rights and freedoms of others.

This is what drives me mad about the stigma around race and iq - now that we know black students are likely to be less intelligent, we could design teaching and studying tactics that would help them achieve higher scores. There will be some black students who don't need it, and some white (and asian etc) who do, and everyone would do better.

That's what should have happened when the bell curve was published - everybody should have used it as an opportunity to help black students - and by extension, improve the lot of black people everywhere. Instead they shrieked about how racist it was and demanded everyone pretend they forgot about it. And so thanks to the wonders of political correctness and identity politics, black people are still behind, and anyone who even thinks about trying to fix it is a white supremacist, even when they aren't white.
 
Oh so "Race and Intelligence" is a fine subject for a science project but when I was a kid "The Effects of Ipecac on my Classmates" was rejected outright.
 
"If the average IQs of blacks, Southeast Asians, and Hispanics are lower than the average IQs of non-Hispanic whites and Northeast Asians, then the racial disproportionality in (HISP) is justified."

sounds like the people running his program were lamenting that they werent diverse enough, so this kid decided to do research LIKE A REAL SCIENTIST OR SOMETHING and examine if the lack of diversity was artificial (ie, a product of racism) or not. if their was a difference in intelligence among races, then the lack of diversity in the schools program would be expected.

what a fucking shitlord. science is for confirming the opinions i hold, not finding information.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo