Here's Why the Internet Is Convinced Shrek's Daughter Is Trans - In the wake of a teaser for Shrek 5, advocates and scholars are unpacking the “she/they-coded” nature of Zendaya's character.

Article / Archive

You’ve heard of “Zendaya is Meechee.” Now get ready for Zendaya is Shrek’s (maybe) transgender daughter.

After what seems like 86 years, there is finally a teaser — and we really mean a tease, as it’s less than 30 seconds — announcing the cast for the fifth installment of the cinematic experience known as Shrek. In the decidedly meta clip dropped Wednesday, the ongoing memeification of the titular character scrolls on the Magic Mirror à la iPhone, showing us brainrot bangers like “Shrek pout sunglasses,” or “Shrek twerks in leather bodysuit,” before landing on an edit of the ogre with a chiseled six pack. We then see Shrek’s daughter, voiced by none other than Zendaya, reacting in apparent disgust — and the reveal of her character has set the internet ablaze.

Before we get into the transgender of it all, let’s just take a moment to look at Shrek’s daughter played by Zendaya. She’s got a nose ring. She’s got green lipstick on. She has bangs and some kind of inscrutable half-up bun situation. She’s following in the family tradition of exclusively wearing green and brown clothing, but she’s accessorizing with a purple crystal necklace. She is, dare I say, incredibly she/they-coded. They might as well go ahead and make her a barista at Farbucks.

But deeper into speculation, eagle-eyed X users noted one crucial detail. In the seminal film Shrek the Third, viewers were introduced to Shrek and Fiona’s three children — triplets named Fergus, Farkle, and Felicia. The latter, notably, was the only girl, and was the only one of the three to be depicted with blue eyes. Since Zendaya’s character in the trailer is depicted with brown eyes, naturally, Shrek advocates and scholars have come to the conclusion that Zendaya’s Shrek character must be trans.

Though Zendaya is currently billed in IMDB as “Felicia,” X users speculate whether this is a red herring. But either way, the truth is, Shrek has always been, low-key, a trans cultural text.

Last May, to commemorate the 20-year anniversary of Shrek 2, Rose Dommu wrote what is perhaps the definitive ode to the trans subtext of everyone’s favorite ogre-centric franchise. As she puts it, “Shrek 2 has a subtext of transness that is barely subtext. To me, it’s just text!” I mean, come on. We see Fiona and Shrek shaving side by side in the very beginning of the movie. There’s the “gender confused wolf.” There’s the villainous tavern run by one of Cinderella’s “ugly stepsisters,” who is a deep-voiced lady named Doris with, well, strong features — and yes, there is a video on YouTube titled “Doris being an iconic girlboss for almost 3 and a half minutes straight 🏳️‍⚧️

And anecdotally, I've seen even the most sardonic trans people get emotional over this movie, with its tale of an outsider who was ostracized and scapegoated for no reason other than the circumstance of his birth. Yeah, you could be a killjoy and argue that it’s fairly common for babies’ eye colors to change between six and nine months of age, including from blue to brown. But where’s the fun in that? And regardless of whether or not the writers and animators ever actually confirm Shrek’s daughter’s trans identity, she’ll always be trans in our hearts.

Shrek 5 will be in theaters Christmas 2026.
 
I can't think of anything people obsess over like this trans stuff other than maybe religion in the past. It certain seems like a pseudoreligious mania. They're literally obsessed with it every waking moment of their life and it defines every fiber of their being.
 
Can't wait for this trash fire of a movie to come out and none of Shrek's kids are trans. With DEI being put on the back burner and USAID money valve being shut off, I cannot see DreamWorks willing to pull a Bud Light here, especially when it's a studio a lot of people believe surpasses Disney.

They could surprise me, but I would think DreamWorks would be smarter than that, especially after watching a competitor bleed money for a decade.
 
"The Internet" is not convinced. Only a handful of very loud people with no jobs to be at who have the time to pump up their posting numbers are.

But that's how it works to journos and special interests. You find one lone opinion on the internet? Suddenly, EVERYONE must be that way! (and any disagreement once you've staked that claim is not genuine).


Can't wait for this trash fire of a movie to come out and none of Shrek's kids are trans. With DEI being put on the back burner and USAID money valve being shut off, I cannot see DreamWorks willing to pull a Bud Light here, especially when it's a studio a lot of people believe surpasses Disney.

They could surprise me, but I would think DreamWorks would be smarter than that, especially after watching a competitor bleed money for a decade.
Any movie with a "5" in the title will not be very good, whether it's woke or not.

Forever franchises are Hollywood's version of games-as-service and corporate America's line-go-up obsession: Nobody asked for them, and you can't make them a thing no matter who you hire and how much you spend.

Even Michelangelo wouldn't be able to wring any quality out of Sistine Chapel 5 (Paint Hard With a Vengeance)
 
Oh shit, a female character who doesn't completely conform to the feminine stereotypes. Must not really be a girl. Kind of flies in the face of the message behind every Shrek movie made before this.

How the fuck is this mentality helpful to feminism again?
 
Zendaya is no where near talented enough to be getting all this work. Whatever incestuous astroturfing is going on is indicative of the reason Hollywood movies aren’t making the same money anymore. You’d think the greedy kikes would realize it by now but nope, they keep doing this shit.
 
I love how it’s easier for these idiots to accept that a male child in a fictional universe would assume the name of his sister and skinwalk as her than it is for them to accept the idea of a continuity error that will be immediately corrected now that its been noticed.
 
Oh shit, a female character who doesn't completely conform to the feminine stereotypes. Must not really be a girl. Kind of flies in the face of the message behind every Shrek movie made before this.

How the fuck is this mentality helpful to feminism again?
They love regressive gender stereotypes SO MUCH, but it’s completely fine when they do it
 
She’s got a nose ring. She’s got green lipstick on. She has bangs and some kind of inscrutable half-up bun situation. She’s following in the family tradition of exclusively wearing green and brown clothing, but she’s accessorizing with a purple crystal necklace. She is, dare I say, incredibly she/they-coded.

1000020472.png

Jesus Christ. Do these people hear themselves talk? What an absolutely ridiculous fucking reach.

"The Internet" is not convinced. Only a handful of very loud people with no jobs to be at who have the time to pump up their posting numbers are.

100% this.

There is a very unpleasant, very obnoxious cabal of people on the Internet who make it their business, every time a film features a female character, to trumpet their tranny headcanons all over social media as if they are factual, presumably because they think they can shift the zeitgeist and have the creators confirm it, after the fact (presumably with a very long-suffering sigh), and thus further legitimise their perverted movement and provide them with a new weapon in their arsenal to groom children (and vulnerable adults) with.

The previous best example of this that I could think of offhand was Spider-Gwen when the Spider-Verse movies came out.
 
Última edición:
Ver archivo adjunto 7045715

Jesus Christ. Do these people hear themselves talk? What an absolutely ridiculous fucking reach.



100% this.

There is a very unpleasant, very obnoxious cabal of people on the Internet who make it their business, every time a film features a female character, to trumpet their tranny headcanons all over social media as if they are factual, presumably because they think they can shift the zeitgeist and have the creators confirm it, after the fact (presumably with a very long-suffering sigh), and thus further legitimise their perverted movement and provide them with a new weapon in their arsenal to groom children (and vulnerable adults) with.

The previous best example of this that I could think of offhand was Spider-Gwen when the Spider-Verse movies came out.
It's almost as bad as the fujoshis insisting that (insert male friends from popular franchise) are really, really gay and just a heartbeat away from dropping trou and fucking on screen.
 
to Shrek and Fiona’s three children — triplets named Fergus, Farkle, and Felicia. The latter, notably, was the only girl, and was the only one of the three to be depicted with blue eyes
Since Zendaya’s character in the trailer is depicted with brown eyes, naturally
To be autistic about it. Babies born with blue eyes won't always keep them. Sometimes they darken and go hazel or brown after.

To be realistic about it. They probably just didn't care about stupid autistic details and continuity like eye colour in a kid's movie.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo