- Registrado
- 13 de Mar, 2022
I dunno but she's hot and this thread seems to be missing some visual representation of her philosophy.
Hawk Tuah and Hegelianism
- Iniciador del tema Santa Klaus
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 1 de Mar, 2020
It's really just a bad transcription. There's no such thing as a "Hawk Tuah". The actual words are Hock and Ptooey (also spelled Ptui):
- Registrado
- 12 de Mar, 2019
The "Hawk" in hawk tuah is in fact an expression of avian spiritualistic animism. Hawk tuah woman is in fact a pagan.
- Registrado
- 1 de Mar, 2020
There’s a reason they get all defensive when you correct the spelling. If you put Hock Ptooey in Gematria, this is what you get:
- Conspiracy
- The Lord Is A Cruel God
- Distract From The Q
- Dont Commit Suicide
- Gabby Petito
- Bestiality
- Government
- Simulation
- Julian Assange
- Nancy Pelosi
- Trump Vance
- God Bless America
- Facing End Of Days
- White House
- Gods Bloodline
- Andrenochrome
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
What a bunch of Continental cope.
Hawk tuah is not an expression of the absolute spirit, since the sexual act of oral stimulation is not absolute in the philosophical sense. To begin with, your perception or experience of arousal is a lower order expression. Arousal is a classic Hegelian contradiction of concepts: you only experience it in contrast to another concept, normalcy, or non-arousal.
You may wish to explore the contradiction to re-express its underlying reality as an independent concept, but your exploration necessarily involves sex, the inclusion of an other, and a dependence on them for the experience*. Arguendo, it may be possible to become aroused without holding a notion about sex, a sexual partner, the partner's features (particular to their gender), and so on. But practically this has never been demonstrated, intellectually we have not come up with a way to do so, and logically it is impossible to imagine the scenario where one is both completely unaware of sex while also knowingly exploring the concept of sex.
But even if you wish to argue these points, we must return the muse of such musings, Hawk Tuah Girl herself. HTG does not contemplate an independent, absolute concept when she suggests you tuah on dat thang; she is explicitly rejecting such a possibility. The act she describes requires both a girl to hawk, and a separate male who possesses a thang upon which to tuah. You can not follow her advice without depending on an external partner. This dependence necessitates a split perception of the act--the female and male experiences--and thus ensures the resulting exploration can never produce a unified, informed experience.
HTG may well be expressing a desire to approach the absolute spirit, through vigorous exercise of the sort she enjoys. However, lacking a thang upon which to experience her own tuah, she finds herself locked out of knowledge. Even assuming her advice is sound and lays on the path to knowledge, she can never advance more than halfway towards the well from which she wishes to drink. Her enthusiasm may well be an expression of bewildered philosophical frustration, as she hawks for all she's worth, but never sees the goal approaching; only the inevitable thang draws near.
Thus, though the dialectical exploration therein may well be instructive, self-consciousness through the absolute spirit will never be approached through blowjobs.
Hawk tuah is not an expression of the absolute spirit, since the sexual act of oral stimulation is not absolute in the philosophical sense. To begin with, your perception or experience of arousal is a lower order expression. Arousal is a classic Hegelian contradiction of concepts: you only experience it in contrast to another concept, normalcy, or non-arousal.
You may wish to explore the contradiction to re-express its underlying reality as an independent concept, but your exploration necessarily involves sex, the inclusion of an other, and a dependence on them for the experience*. Arguendo, it may be possible to become aroused without holding a notion about sex, a sexual partner, the partner's features (particular to their gender), and so on. But practically this has never been demonstrated, intellectually we have not come up with a way to do so, and logically it is impossible to imagine the scenario where one is both completely unaware of sex while also knowingly exploring the concept of sex.
One who masturbates may be exploring their own body and its feelings, but does not explore the concept of sex itself. The practice is fraught with contradictions--the lack of a partner, the guaranteed lack of a fruitful ending, the various emotional blockages required to proceed, the physical improvisation to mimic the more absolute act of sexual completion, etc.
Masturbation does not further the speculative dialectic around the arousal which prompts it. Plus you'll go blind.
Masturbation does not further the speculative dialectic around the arousal which prompts it. Plus you'll go blind.
But even if you wish to argue these points, we must return the muse of such musings, Hawk Tuah Girl herself. HTG does not contemplate an independent, absolute concept when she suggests you tuah on dat thang; she is explicitly rejecting such a possibility. The act she describes requires both a girl to hawk, and a separate male who possesses a thang upon which to tuah. You can not follow her advice without depending on an external partner. This dependence necessitates a split perception of the act--the female and male experiences--and thus ensures the resulting exploration can never produce a unified, informed experience.
HTG may well be expressing a desire to approach the absolute spirit, through vigorous exercise of the sort she enjoys. However, lacking a thang upon which to experience her own tuah, she finds herself locked out of knowledge. Even assuming her advice is sound and lays on the path to knowledge, she can never advance more than halfway towards the well from which she wishes to drink. Her enthusiasm may well be an expression of bewildered philosophical frustration, as she hawks for all she's worth, but never sees the goal approaching; only the inevitable thang draws near.
Thus, though the dialectical exploration therein may well be instructive, self-consciousness through the absolute spirit will never be approached through blowjobs.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 5 de Nov, 2018
- Registrado
- 6 de Nov, 2014
Oh so it is spitting on the dick before sucky sucky rove you rong time.
This is much less interesting than a featherjeet spirit animal orgy.
I am dissapoint.
This is much less interesting than a featherjeet spirit animal orgy.
I am dissapoint.
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
@Harvey Danger Stupid nigger. I just asked an AI to write why Hawk Tuah is a Hegelian masterpiece and you're here thinking I wrote all of this and this is a serious thread. This is why we need to exterminate spergs (in CSGO).
- Registrado
- 8 de Dic, 2020
Glad to see that philosophy major coming in handy
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
I just asked an AI to write why Hawk Tuah is a Hegelian masterpiece and he's here thinking I wrote all of this and this is a serious thread. This is why we need to exterminate spergs (in CSGO). Not understand sarcasm or irony is an autism symptom and thinking about absolute shit nobody cares about like Hegelianism or sports statistics is an another symptom.
- Registrado
- 8 de Dic, 2020
I believe in an alternate version of occams razor where I believe the funniest version of reality is most likely rather than the most simple
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
Listen here you little faggot, I just ran circles around you and your robot master without popping open Google. If you're too smooth brained to crack a joke without sucking LLM cock, at least understand the punchline it vomits on you. Don't come crying to me when you get BTFO by someone who can string a sentence together without the help of electrified sand spotting you 3 billion computations per second.
AI? Spergs? Bitch you joined 5 days ago, you don't know shit from tits. You think the Deep Thoughts board is for fun and games? If you can't read the Chinese Room to figure out its tone, then fuck off back to 4chan like the wannabe redditor you are. You aren't equipped for sarcasm, you're stuck in the 4th level of samsara with an unlit lantern shoved up your ass. Your jokes are lamer than your dialectic. You have the reading comprehension of a 5th grade prompt engineer, and only half the awareness of a slightly damp sock.
Philosophy is serious business you unenlightened gorilla nigger.
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
I'm proud of your transition. Keep being brave.
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
@Harvey Danger Are you a gay autist or something?
Sneed's Feed n Seed
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2024
Hawk Tuah morality, in my Kiwi Farms?
- Registrado
- 4 de Oct, 2021
She can hawk tuah on me, if you know what I'm saying...
Grub
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Jul, 2021
I gotta say @Santa Klaus was looking like the bigger faggot until you got all philosophy butthurt and sperged out. Now you both just seem like retards.
- Registrado
- 20 de Sep, 2024
That bad boy is gonna get coal.