Business Google sued by the ACCC over alleged misuse of personal data - Google will likely do nothing despite the fine.

Tech giant Google has been hauled into the Federal Court by regulators over allegations it has been misleading consumers about the personal location data it collects, keeps and uses.

Key points:
  • The ACCC said Google's instructions on how to stop personal data being harvested were misleading
  • The allegations go to the heart of the tech giant's business model of using data unrelated to a consumer's use of Google services
  • The ACCC says it is a world-first action and it is seeking fines and compliance orders against Google in a crackdown on digital platform disclosures

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said it was the first time a regulator anywhere in world had taken on the global giant, which has a current market value of about $US880 billion (A1.3 trillion), over the alleged misuse of personal data.

In documents lodged with the court, the ACCC said Google misled consumers when it made on-screen representations about the location data it collected, and in particular about continuing to collect and use personal data against consumers' wishes.

The ACCC said that as such, Google had breached Australian consumer law.

"We are taking court action against Google because we allege that as a result of these on-screen representations Google has collected, kept and used highly sensitive and valuable personal information about consumers' location without them making an informed choice," ACCC chair Rod Sims said.

"This is a world-first case; this action in relation to misrepresentations in relation to the data Google collects, keeps and uses has never been taken before."

Tougher new penalties

Mr Sims noted while some of the breaches were alleged to have occurred under old laws, others may have been committed under a tougher new regime which carries fines of up to 10 per cent of a company's turnover.
"Some of the allegations we're making today are under the old penalty regime, some are under the new, but going forward Australia now has a penalty regime that can actually make a difference," Mr Sims said.
The action centres on protecting the rights of consumers who set up a Google account and accessed their account settings through their Android mobile phones and tablets.


The ACCC said Google's on-screen advice meant consumers were unaware two account settings — one labelled Location History and another labelled Web & App Activity — had to be switched off to prevent personal data from being collected.

In its statement, the ACCC alleged that from January 2017 until late 2018 it was misleading for Google to not properly disclose to consumers that both settings had to be switched off if consumers didn't want Google to collect, keep and use their location data.

ACCC argued that Google account holders trying to maintain their privacy had been misled by Google about what needed to be done.

"Many consumers make a conscious decision to turn off settings to stop the collection of their location data, but we allege that Google's conduct may have prevented consumers from making that choice," Mr Sims said.

"Our case is that consumers would have understood as a result of this conduct that by switching off their Location History setting, Google would stop collecting their location data, plain and simple," Mr Sims said.

"We allege that Google misled consumers by staying silent about the fact that another setting also had to be switched off."

Business model

The legal action targets the heart of Google's business model, with the ACCC alleging the company did not disclose that the data it harvested may be used for a number of other purposes unrelated to the consumer's use of Google's services.

Mr Sims said cracking down on transparency and disclosure of digital platforms, such as Google and Facebook, was a top priority for the ACCC.

"We consider that because of Google's failure to disclose this use of data, consumers were and still are deprived of the opportunity to make an informed choice about whether to share their personal location data with Google," Mr Sims said.

"Transparency and inadequate disclosure issues involving digital platforms and consumer data were a major focus of our Digital Platforms Inquiry, and remain one of the ACCC's top priorities."

Mr Sims noted there could be wider implications for Google and other platforms in the future, but the ACCC deliberately chose a narrow focus on Google and its Android devices in this case.

"I think there are issues with other devices," he said. "

This particular case, as our cases necessarily must be, has narrowed down to the Android devices, so we wanted to focus the case. Only if you focus it do you get it into court in a reasonable time.

"We had five investigations, in-depth investigations, underway … the others are still in the pipeline, they'll work their way through. I'd be confident there'll be further action coming at some stage."

The ACCC is seeking penalties, declarations and orders requiring the publication of corrective notices and the establishment of a compliance program.

Google said it was reviewing the details of the ACCC's allegations.

"We continue to engage with the ACCC and intend to defend this matter," a Google spokesperson said in a brief statement.

 
Too bad that being Australia, they'll go at it completely ass backwards and utterly fuck it up.
Considering that we're run by Boomers and Gen-X'ers, it's the most probable outcome. Dunno how you'd mess up fining a company, but I'm sure they'll find a way.
 
Why would the governments even want to change this shit?

I'm not suggesting some kind of conspiracy shit, just basic economic abuse of a system. You're the gubmint and you see a company do some dumb no-no so you smack 'em with a fine of 10 million dollars. The company's big enough that it won't even hurt them in the slightest, and in a month's time they're back at it again. You just keep smacking them with fines and keep raking in extra money without actually solving the problem. Where in this lies a problem? The victims here are users who keep wanting you to punish them, so to the letter of the request but not the spirit, you fine the company. That's it.

Asking the government to solve this shit isn't solving shit. Stop using the company's services if you want change.
 
I'm not suggesting some kind of conspiracy shit, just basic economic abuse of a system. You're the gubmint and you see a company do some dumb no-no so you smack 'em with a fine of 10 million dollars. The company's big enough that it won't even hurt them in the slightest, and in a month's time they're back at it again. You just keep smacking them with fines and keep raking in extra money without actually solving the problem. Where in this lies a problem? The victims here are users who keep wanting you to punish them, so to the letter of the request but not the spirit, you fine the company. That's it.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is independent of the Australian Government. To put it simply, they're our consumer watchdog, who advocates for consumer rights, protections, etc. in Australia. I have some faith in them to crackdown on it, given their recent history such as successfully taking on Valve on not issuing refunds to Australian consumers under Australian consumer law.

They apparently changed their compliance and enforcement policies to make it a "tougher new regime which carries fines of up to 10 per cent of a company's turnover. " If they go all the way with it, they could be targeting Google's annual revenue rather than a slap-on-the wrist fine. Will they take it that far? Probably not.
 
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is independent of the Australian Government. To put it simply, they're our consumer watchdog, who advocates for consumer rights, protections, etc. in Australia. I have some faith in them to crackdown on it, given their recent history such as successfully taking on Valve on not issuing refunds to Australian consumers under Australian consumer law.

They apparently changed their compliance and enforcement policies to make it a "tougher new regime which carries fines of up to 10 per cent of a company's turnover. " If they go all the way with it, they could be targeting Google's annual revenue rather than a slap-on-the wrist fine. Will they take it that far? Probably not.

If they can tax a company 10% of its income, I'd be hard pressed to say that isn't government. Taxation is a government power. I hope it's independent enough to punish them effectively, though.
 
If they can tax a company 10% of its income, I'd be hard pressed to say that isn't government. Taxation is a government power. I hope it's independent enough to punish them effectively, though.

It's a statutory authority which falls under the Treasury portfolio. It definitely has the power to throw its weight around but to what extent it will do so in this instance remains to be seen. It's pretty much impossible to make Google hurt financially and I'm not sure this will be regarded as egregious enough to warrant the maximum available penalty.
 
Is this a world first?

The EU previously fined Google billions for wardriving "accidentally" collecting unencrypted wifi traffic in their street view vehicles in order to bootstrap their geolocation database. I guess this is a slightly different angle, since it's ostensibly about consumer protection, but that just seems like splitting hairs to me.
 
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is independent of the Australian Government. To put it simply, they're our consumer watchdog, who advocates for consumer rights, protections, etc. in Australia. I have some faith in them to crackdown on it, given their recent history such as successfully taking on Valve on not issuing refunds to Australian consumers under Australian consumer law.

They apparently changed their compliance and enforcement policies to make it a "tougher new regime which carries fines of up to 10 per cent of a company's turnover. " If they go all the way with it, they could be targeting Google's annual revenue rather than a slap-on-the wrist fine. Will they take it that far? Probably not.

For more context, the ACCC is one of a handful of government agencies here that are regarded as being both truly independent of the government and very competent. They don't win every case, but I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have gone after this one without something watertight. I wouldn't be surprised at a fairly significant fine. Not enough to change Google's behaviour globally, certainly, but not wholly irrelevant. The biggest risk for them in not responding to a loss would probably be regulators in other countries following suit.
 
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is independent of the Australian Government. To put it simply, they're our consumer watchdog, who advocates for consumer rights, protections, etc. in Australia. I have some faith in them to crackdown on it, given their recent history such as successfully taking on Valve on not issuing refunds to Australian consumers under Australian consumer law.

They apparently changed their compliance and enforcement policies to make it a "tougher new regime which carries fines of up to 10 per cent of a company's turnover. " If they go all the way with it, they could be targeting Google's annual revenue rather than a slap-on-the wrist fine. Will they take it that far? Probably not.
Hey if you say you'd trust them, I can't argue with that since I'm not an Oz. I'll be more than happy to believe that some groups can actually do something about Google, because I like at least some shit in the world to be fair for once.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo