Google Says It Will Delete Location Data When Users Visit Abortion Clinics - Under pressure from employees and supporters of reproductive rights, the company announced privacy changes for the post-Roe era.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Nico Grant
July 1, 2022, 6:03 p.m. ET
SAN FRANCISCO — Google said on Friday that it would delete abortion clinic visits from the location history of its users, in the company’s first effort to address how it will handle sensitive data in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.
The location data change will take place in the coming weeks, Jen Fitzpatrick, a Google senior vice president, wrote in a blog post. The policy will also apply to trips to fertility clinics, domestic violence shelters, addiction treatment facilities and other sensitive locations.
Google, which holds reams of intimate information about its billions of users, has come under scrutiny since the Supreme Court’s decision last week to strike down Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years. Some supporters of reproductive rights have pushed people to delete apps that track their menstrual cycles online, while experts saidsearch and location data from companies like Google are more likely to be used as evidence.
The overturning of Roe has more broadly renewed questions about how much data and digital trails people have produced, which could be used to surveil or target those who try and get an abortion. In states that allow bans or other limits on abortion, law enforcement is expected to be focused on taking action against medical providers, but information about individuals — including location data, payments data and more — is not hard to obtain through data brokers and other sources.

The Alphabet Workers Union, a group representing more than 800 people who work for Google’s parent company, Alphabet, demanded on Tuesday that the search giant delete any personal data that law enforcement could try to use to prosecute those who are getting abortions.
With Friday’s announcement, while Google will delete some location data, it did not commit to automatically deleting search records about abortions, which may also become sought after. Users must individually opt to delete their search history.

Google has been sued by the state of Texas, accused of continuing to track users even when they use the Chrome web browsers’ supposedly private Incognito Mode — which may further erode confidence that the company will purge all data when people try to browse privately.
Google also made no commitments about changing the way it handles government data requests.
“We remain committed to protecting our users against improper government demands for data, and we will continue to oppose demands that are overly broad or otherwise legally objectionable,” Ms. Fitzpatrick wrote.
The company also said that users will soon be able to more quickly delete multiple menstruation logs stored on Fitbit, a health-tracking company owned by Google, rather than one at a time. The company also reminded users to employ existing settings options on Google to improve their online privacy.

 
Yeah, but usually their agendas include making more money or something, not aiding in ushering in some Marxist revolution.
Liberals are screaming into the void for someone to do something, and this is Google answering the call IMO. Utterly silly change that affects nothing but Shows They Care which buys them goodwill with some drones. This applies to both regular people and their own employers fwiw.

Only thing I can really think of.
 
There is legislation looking to try to criminalize it though I don’t know how well that would hold up constitutionally.
there are some crimes that can be prosecuted if you go over state lines to do it.
evading your states age of consent is one.
if it's 18 in your state and you fuck a girl in a state where it's 16, you can be prosecuted for that.
 
There'll still be location data for the entire trip, it's just gonna mysteriously have a blank spot of activity a block around the clinic. If they were that concerned about users in this situation it'd still be trivial to figure out what they're doing
That's just makes this whole thing more retarded. If someone looks at the murderer's location data and see a bunch of locations they went by then blank, they're not gonna think, "Where TF did they go?" They'll know exactly what happened.

Like the Streisand's Effect, deleting the data makes it more obvious where the woman went.
 
Bizzrare article. Are we supposed to read this and go ‘yeah nice one google!’ Instead of ‘you track me everywhere I go and sell that data to other people..?’
 
It’s a federal law, specifically 18 USC § 2423, part b, which makes it illegal to “Travel With Intent To Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct.“, where illicit sexual conduct is basically sex with someone under the age of 18, or making CP. In this case, there is no law stating it is illegal to “travel with intent to abort a child”, and there probably never will be. So it’s not quite as simple as “fed think thing bad, arrest if you cross state lines”, you still need to have broken a specific federal law, but given how many of them there are, its actually quite hard not to do so, especially since lying to a federal officer, even unintentionally can get you in trouble.

What makes it worse is congress has made it a crime to violate any of the rules or regulations of the fed alphabet agencies. So rather than having to have broken a law that was passed by congress and signed in to law by the president all you have to do is violate some rule written down by some unelected pencil pusher. It is hard to keep up on all the new laws. It is virtually impossible to keep up with all the rules and regs of the assorted alphabet mafias.

I know congress is lazy, really lazy but I am surprised they just handed away the ability to make laws to unelected bureaucrats. One of the main sources of income for congress critters is donations from constituents who don't want some new law to put them out of business or they do want some new law to put their competitors out of business. Harder to get that sweet, sweet & somehow legal bribe money when you have farmed your job out to alphabet agencies that are slightly harder to legally bribe.
 
Does this include the Herravad data that they collect from every Android phone and is used to map, within 10m, where people are in a heatmap, that they later sell to T-Mobile and other companies?
 
Última edición:
Even when they virtue signal, they still make themselves look incredibly evil.

When will liberals realize they’re just being played by big mega corporations? Mega corporations are also offering women money to travel places to get an abortion so they can go right back to work. They like that you can’t have a family because having time for family means less money for them.

Imagine the look of horror on the average feminist's face when they realize that the best way to stick it to the man is to quit her job and get back into the fucking kitchen.

Hyperbolic language aside, I think many will go that route, maybe realize that the whole thing was bullshit. Once again, leftists do have the tendency to reverse-engineer traditionalism and act like they discovered Atlantis.

I think TERFs are a good example of this, for example, even if it's an example of the earliest stages.

Yeah, but usually their agendas include making more money or something, not aiding in ushering in some Marxist revolution.

Doesn't matter to me if they're sincere or not. Rich fucks are almost always at the vanguard of the marxist revolution. Engels comes to mind.

They just want to destroy their competition, that is all.
 
Yeah but if a man wants to marry a woman shouldn’t he have access to the information if she has had abortion before or not? Some men believe strongly in God and may be fearful that if they get a woman pregnant the woman will get abortion. Christian men believe that abortion is murder so, that means his child has now been murdered. But I guess that should be a conversation that Christin man has with the woman before he has sex with her. And in retrospect this man may believe he needs to be married before having sex anyway actually. Hmm. So many questions.
 
Isn't that quite literally the corporation saying it will abet crimes, which is illegal? How can you even do that if the existence of the clinic is illegal?
 
How is this even supposed to work from a technical perspective? It seems like there would be a "negative space" problem:

>we're tracking this person
>they left their house
>they went toward an abortion clinic
>"gosh! they disappeared!"
>::4 hrs pass::
>"there they are! next to the abortion clinic and heading home"
 
Atrás
Top Abajo