Business Google considers charging for AI-powered search - Would you pay to use a search engine?

Proposals would mark first time any of the software group’s core product falls behind a paywall​

1712272779695.png
Google began testing an experimental AI-powered search service in May, presenting more detailed answers to queries while continuing to present users with links to further information and advertising © FT montage/Getty Images/Dreamstime

Madhumita Murgia in London and Richard Waters in San Diego
YESTERDAY

Google is considering charging for new “premium” features powered by generative artificial intelligence, in what would be the biggest ever shake-up of its search business.

The proposed revamp to its cash cow search engine would mark the first time the company has put any of its core product behind a paywall, and shows it is still grappling with a technology that threatens its advertising business, almost a year and a half after the debut of ChatGPT.

Google is looking at options including adding certain AI-powered search features to its premium subscription services, which already offer access to its new Gemini AI assistant in Gmail and Docs, according to three people with knowledge of its plans.

Engineers are developing the technology needed to deploy the service but executives have not yet made a final decision on whether or when to launch it, one of the people said.

Google’s traditional search engine would remain free of charge, while ads would continue to appear alongside search results even for subscribers.

But charging would represent the first time that Google — which for many years offered free consumer services funded entirely by advertising — has made people pay for enhancements to its core search product.

Google reported $175bn in revenue from search and related ads last year, more than half its total sales, posing a conundrum for the company over how to embrace the latest AI innovations while preserving its biggest profit driver.

Since November 2022, when OpenAI launched ChatGPT, Google has been scrambling to respond to the competitive threat posed by the wildly popular chatbot. ChatGPT can give quick and complete answers to many questions, threatening to render redundant a traditional search engine’s list of links, and the lucrative ads that appear alongside them.

Google began testing an experimental AI-powered search service in May last year, presenting more detailed answers to queries while also continuing to present users with links to further information and advertising. However, it has been slow to add any of the features from what it calls its “Search Generative Experience” experiment to its main search engine.

These kinds of search results, which include an “AI-powered snapshot”, are more costly for Google to serve up than its traditional responses because generative AI consumes a lot more computing resources. It has offered access to SGE to only a select few users, including some subscribers to its Google One bundle that offers benefits such as extra cloud storage for a monthly fee.

Microsoft, which has an expansive partnership with OpenAI, launched improved GPT-powered search and a chatbot, now called Copilot, in its Bing search engine more than a year ago. However, the new AI features have done little to boost Bing’s market share, which lags far behind Google.

Some analysts have warned that Google’s ad business could suffer if its search engine provided more complete AI-generated answers that no longer required users to click through to its advertisers’ websites. Also, many online publishers that depend on Google for internet traffic fear fewer users will visit their sites if Google’s AI-powered search extracts information from their web pages and presents it to users directly.

Google this year added a new premium tier to its Google One consumer subscription service for users who wanted to use its most advanced Gemini chatbot. It has also added Gemini to Workspace, its suite of online productivity apps like Gmail and Docs.

It is unclear how exactly the company would seek to integrate AI-powered search into these paid-for services, which offer different pricing tiers, or when the AI-powered search offering would be ready to launch. Google could still decide to launch certain elements of its experimental AI-powered service into its main, free search engine over time, according to people familiar with its thinking.

Google said the company was “not working on or considering” an ad-free search experience but that it would “continue to build new premium capabilities and services to enhance our subscription offerings across Google”.

“For years, we’ve been reinventing Search to help people access information in the way that’s most natural to them,” said Google. “With our generative AI experiments in Search, we’ve already served billions of queries, and we’re seeing positive Search query growth in all of our major markets. We’re continuing to rapidly improve the product to serve new user needs.”

It added: “We don’t have anything to announce right now.”

Source (Archive)
 

We should be begging Google to charge us​

We got used to digital things being free. Artificial intelligence will change all that​

MATTHEW LYNN
7 April 2024 • 11:00am
This guy is a mega mondo faggot.

"We should be thanking our overlords for giving us free Google! Please, fuck me harder, Master Google!"
 
If I want wikia/fandom, preddit, amaconsoom, cnn/fox propaganda, I directly visit their sites. I don't need google.
 
I can't really recall the last time I used a search engine... the Internet is to small these days for one to have any value.
Surprisingly some independent websites and shops come up in search engines sometimes. The Internet is still big, it's just being choked and filtered by certain interests trying to funnel all activity into 4 sites or so owned by megacorporations and partially funded by the US government and lobby groups. When you break through their algorithms that solely promote shit like reddit and twitter posts mixed with scam gibberish sites raking keywords from legit sites an"40%"off" added to the end of the quote for no discernible reason again this becomes very clear.

It's increasingly harder to open up into the wider Internet space the more this invasive "Ai suggestion" shit gets. In practice it's an intentionally worse version of the algorithm stuff that's existed already for over 2 decades or so but with "AI! ADVANCED MACHINE LEARNING!" marketing lingo. It's starting to affect search engines on non search engine places too! An immediate example that comes to mind is how I found out if you look up anything with the word "hiss" on etsy or ebay it'll keep trying to auto-change the search to "kiss" sometimes. Made it surprisingly hellish to find some 3d printed thing I was trying to figure out the price of with that word in it a year or 2 ago.
 
People who still rely on some gmail as their primary email address need to diversify, and soon.
Google already was a company utterly dependent on their search/advertising revenue obscuring the mountain of failed new ventures, if they're fucking with search now that reveals a new level of desperation.
Honestly, this move by Alphabet sort of feels like it tracks. Google Search has objectively become awful and unusable, more than likely due to meddling by the team behind the search engine. Now they get to "bring back" Classic Google but at an elevated cost to the consumer. It's like an artificial "shrink flation" in concept.
 
Honestly, this move by Alphabet sort of feels like it tracks. Google Search has objectively become awful and unusable, more than likely due to meddling by the team behind the search engine. Now they get to "bring back" Classic Google but at an elevated cost to the consumer. It's like an artificial "shrink flation" in concept.
I'd say less "shrinkflation" and more "create a problem and then conveniently sell people the solution to the problem that you created". Like how cosmetics companies make makeup that's terrible for your skin but also sell products that are supposed to help your skin look better.

Maybe I'm missing something and that's what you mean, though.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo