- Registrado
- 14 de Mayo, 2021
Don't worry, civilization will collapse one day and we will all gradually go extinct. God is waiting for us at the precipice of extinction.
(by the way, I'm drunk too)
(by the way, I'm drunk too)
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
But they did over arguing over how to worship the Bible.Billions of theists throughout history didn't lose their faith from the hypothetical existence of monsters. Grow up.
Oh no, did I do this to you?lets say you let a monke/human hybrid be carried to completion, and what if it some how gained human level intelligence and sentience?
no I knew china was doing it but the us wants to do it, man bear pig killed god. I know china would fucking do it they would shit like this in a heartbeat, but the usa wanting to do it yeah no...
I am not triggered by embryos I am triggered that a scientist thought it was okay to mix human and animal dna to make chimera embryos.Doomer BBW with a full hysterecto gets triggered by embryos
Imagine my fucking shock
true but the diffence is what ligers and mules can be a natural byproduct of a tiger and lion boinking, which is like in the same genus of species felines, whats sciencetists are doing is taking 2 different species human and pig for example and splicing them; the problem isnt the neccesarily the act of doing it, its the ethics, I mean granted beyond of small rare occurances, no one has successfuly knocked up an animal or vice versa and fathered or sired and abomination, there was humanized cells implanted into mice to test drugs, but not actual pig man baby, so how are we to not know if lmoa by splicing genes into embryos that it wont come out with an abomination with human sentience, and then what would be the ethics of doing? We have strict human experimintation guidelines, animals are lower on that, the problem I don't like the idea of it. its just wrong even if nature does win out in the end, its still a boundary we shouldnt cross.So I'm about to be gay as fuck here:
The thing about all this shit is that nature almost always wins in the end. It is currently pretty undefeated because nature plays the long game. People trip out about climate change because of the damage it does, but what they stay quiet about is they are worried about it because of how it impacts humans. The environment and world will outlast humans no matter what shit we do to it because it can spend 1000s of years recovering.
This kind of thing with weird hybrids and shit inevitably fails because its not something nature allows by design. They may achieve one, but it'll be fucked up and die and be sterile. Most hybrids are, even the ones that can occur in nature like mules or ligers.
There's no need to prove the truth of what I said. You remain laughably unqualified to comment on issues of reproduction.I am not triggered by embryos I am triggered that a scientist thought it was okay to mix human and animal dna to make chimera embryos.
I'm not opposed to stem cell research what I am opposed to is splicing human and animal dna to make embryos.As ludicrous as it is, I'm shocked that people are so quick to dismiss this. We just had a vaccine that alters RNA and Crispr has been making advancements; not to mention Stem Cell research is still on going. There are a lot of possibilities that could be happening.
God was never alive to begin with.I was watching china and america uncensored, and they were talking about the senate wanting ot approve a bill that includes experimentation on human animal chimera embryos to keep up with china; and it got me thinking, god is dead, he has forsaken us, and there is no hope. I am not avidly prolife other than aborting kids on trivial factors, such as sex, or because its a main form of birth control. I am not really religious, I mean I do fear hell and god, but I dont go to church every day, but this is just too much. Like even if I take religion out of the whole equitation what would be the end game, the final result if lets say you let a monke/human hybrid be carried to completion, and what if it some how gained human level intelligence and sentience? How would it be ethical to treat a being manufactured with human characteristics as little more than a test subject? Part of what makes us human is our sentience and capacity to reason, on a higher level, we're more than inherent animal instinct, and because of this we acknowledge that with such capacity and ability to reason we also have rights. Even if a monke and a human are closely related in the same species, the reason monkes are lower on the the totem pool si because were more advanced. It feels worse than human experimentation because not only would we be forcing a thing to live, it can live in pain and misery with possibly a more acute awareness of its suffering akin to a human. Like thats a possiblity, I am not saying a 100 percent but its a possiblity that can happane and it scares me.
yes and by better humans you mean cat girls, and irl living breathing furfags.God was never alive to begin with.
There is no doubt, no question that better humans are around the corner - we just of course will have to all agree on what by definition a "better" human is.
We should test the hell out of embryos and go nuts. Let's not hold back and just get it done. It could be interesting what we come up with.