War Global Nuclear Stockpile Set to Grow for First Time Since Cold War


The world's stockpile of nuclear warheads is expected to expand in the coming years for the first time since the 1980s and the catastrophic threat of those weapons being used is escalating, a leading arms watchdog said Monday.

"If the nuclear-armed states take no immediate and concrete action on disarmament, then the global inventory of nuclear warheads could soon begin to increase for the first time since the Cold War," Matt Korda, an associate researcher with the Weapons of Mass Destruction Program at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, said in a statement released alongside SIPRI's annual report.

As of early 2022, nine countries—Russia, the United States, China, France, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea—possessed a combined total of 12,705 nuclear warheads, SIPRI estimates. Together, Russia and the U.S. control more than 90% of this global inventory.

global-nuclear-arsenal-2022_0.png

Of the estimated 12,705 nuclear warheads in existence at the start of 2022, roughly 9,440 were in military stockpiles for potential use, according to SIPRI. Of those, an estimated 3,732 were deployed with missiles and aircraft, and about 2,000—nearly all of which belonged to Russia or the U.S.—were kept in a state of high operational readiness.

While the total number of nuclear weapons decreased slightly from 13,080 last January to 12,705 this January, SIPRI expects the global supply of weapons capable of annihilating human life on Earth to increase over the next decade.

"All of the nuclear-armed states are increasing or upgrading their arsenals and most are sharpening nuclear rhetoric and the role nuclear weapons play in their military strategies," said Wilfred Wan, director of SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Program. "This is a very worrying trend."

As the think tank explains:

Although Russian and U.S. total warhead inventories continued to decline in 2021, this was due to the dismantling of warheads that had been retired from military service several years ago. The number of warheads in the two countries' useable military stockpiles remained relatively stable in 2021. Both countries' deployed strategic nuclear forces were within the limits set by a bilateral nuclear arms reduction treaty (2010 Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, New START). Note, however, that New START does not limit total non-strategic nuclear warhead inventories.
China is in the middle of a substantial expansion of its nuclear weapon arsenal, which satellite images indicate includes the construction of over 300 new missile silos. Several additional nuclear warheads are thought to have been assigned to operational forces in 2021 following the delivery of new mobile launchers and a submarine.
The U.K. in 2021 announced its decision to increase the ceiling on its total warhead stockpile, in a reversal of decades of gradual disarmament policies. While criticizing China and Russia for lack of nuclear transparency, the U.K. also announced that it would no longer publicly disclose figures for the country’s operational nuclear weapon stockpile, deployed warheads, or deployed missiles.
In early 2021 France officially launched a program to develop a third-generation nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN). India and Pakistan appear to be expanding their nuclear arsenals, and both countries introduced and continued to develop new types of nuclear delivery system in 2021. Israel—which does not publicly acknowledge possessing nuclear weapons—is also believed to be modernizing its nuclear arsenal.
North Korea continues to prioritize its military nuclear program as a central element of its national security strategy. While North Korea conducted no nuclear test explosions or long-range ballistic missile tests during 2021, SIPRI estimates that the country has now assembled up to 20 warheads, and possesses enough fissile material for a total of 45–55 warheads.
"There are clear indications that the reductions that have characterized global nuclear arsenals since the end of the Cold War have ended," said Hans Kristensen, an associate senior fellow with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Program and director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists.

Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in late February, experts have warned that the ongoing war in Europe could spiral into a direct conflict between Moscow and NATO—both flush with nuclear weapons—but the U.S.-led military alliance has continued to prioritize weapons shipments over diplomacy.

"Relations between the world's great powers," SIPRI board chair and former Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven lamented Monday, "have deteriorated further at a time when humanity and the planet face an array of profound and pressing common challenges that can only be addressed by international cooperation."

Despite issuing a joint statement on January 3 affirming that "nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought" and reaffirming that they intend to adhere to non-proliferation, disarmament, and arms control agreements and pledges, Russia, the U.S., China, France, and the U.K.—all five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—continue to enlarge or modernize their nuclear arsenals.

During its military assault on Ukraine, Russia has even openly threatened to use nuclear weapons. As bilateral talks between Russia and the U.S. have ground to a halt amid the war, none of the other seven nuclear-armed states have pursued arms control negotiations.

In addition, the U.N. Security Council's five permanent members have expressed opposition to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons that entered into force last January when it was ratified by 50 governments, and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, more commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, has yet to be restored by the Biden administration.

U.S. President Joe Biden's latest Nuclear Posture Review, released in March, has also been condemned for failing to commit to a no-first-use policy.

"Although there were some significant gains in both nuclear arms control and nuclear disarmament in the past year," said SIPRI director Dan Smith, "the risk of nuclear weapons being used seems higher now than at any time since the height of the Cold War."

🎵"weeeeee'll meeeet again/don't know where/don't know wheeeeen..."🎵
 
Well here is an update since the Russians decided the START is a farce.

Which it is, given the Chinese don't allow anyone to look at their stuff while sharing intelligence about America to the Russians as well.

And there is the question of India and Pakistan and Israel with their nukes.

And I don't know if the French and British allow outside inspections of their nukes as well.

Russia Halts US Inspections of Its Nuclear Arsenals (Archive)

Russia on Monday announced a freeze on U.S. inspections of its nuclear arsenals under a pivotal arms control treaty, claiming that Western sanctions have hampered similar tours of U.S. facilities by Russian monitors.

The move reflects soaring tensions between Moscow and Washington over Russia’s military action in Ukraine and marks the first time the Kremlin halted U.S. inspections under the New START nuclear arms control treaty.

In declaring the freeze on U.S. inspections, the Russian Foreign Ministry said the sanctions on Russian flights imposed by the U.S. and its allies, visa restrictions and other obstacles effectively have made it impossible for Russian military experts to visit U.S. nuclear weapons sites, giving the U.S. “unilateral advantages.”

The Biden administration had no immediate public response to the move. Ankit Panda, an expert on nuclear policy at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, called Russia's action “a cynical attempt to pressure the United States” over penalties the West has imposed on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.

“They basically are using New START inspections — something the U.S. cares about — to force Washington's hands,” Panda said.

Russia claimed that U.S. inspectors have not faced such difficulties, even though Moscow has closed its skies to the European Union’s 27 nations, the U.K. and Canada — though not the U.S. — after the start of the conflict in Ukraine in late February. Russia said at the time that exceptions would be made for diplomatic missions and deliveries of humanitarian aid.

The Russian Foreign Ministry claimed that the freeze is temporary and allowed by the pact “in exceptional cases.”

It noted that Russia “highly values” the New START, adding that inspections could resume after the problems hampering them are solved.

“Russia is fully committed to abiding by all of the provisions of New START, which we see as a crucial tool for maintaining international security and stability,” the ministry said, urging a “thorough study of all existing problems in this area, the successful settlement of which would allow a return to full-scale application as soon as possible of all verification mechanisms of the Treaty.”

“After the problems regarding the resumption of inspection activities under the Treaty are resolved, we will immediately lift the exemptions from inspection activities that we have announced,” the ministry said.

The New START treaty, signed in 2010 by President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, limits each country to no more than 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 700 deployed missiles and bombers, and envisages sweeping on-site inspections to verify compliance.

Just days before the New START was due to expire in February 2021, Russia and the United States agreed to extend it for another five years.

Panda, the security analyst, noted that Russia's action also comes during a review conference for the half-century-old Nonproliferation Treaty in New York, where the United States and Russia are discussing continued strategic arms reductions.

“At a time when nuclear risks between the two sides are far from waning, it’s essential that the inspection protocols in the Treaty are fully restored,” he said. “The pandemic had its toll on New START inspection activity and Moscow’s unfortunate decision stands to further jeopardize things.”
 
I'm not surprised at the renewed interest. China and Russia are sabre rattling, and I think Japan recently requested to host some nukes from the US because they're getting pissed off at China.

Plus, you really can't trust other countries (who we have icy relations with) to actually keep their word and decommission their nukes instead of keeping it hidden away somewhere.
 
Good. We need at least 5 each for Portland and Seattle.
 
Breaking News-

An Air Force Trans Major hijacked a bomber with nuclear weaponry and released a 100kt thermonuclear bomb upon Chicago. She reportedly shot and killed all the crew members including a new recruit because he refused to take orders from a "Freak in a skirt". The Bomber was destroyed in the fireball over Chicago and released an unknown amount of radioactive particles from other nuclear bombs that settled in Detroit which now is hotter than a nuclear reactor. As many as 20 million might perish.

President Biden at a news conference expressed outrage of the ongoing transphobia gripping the nation. And added he will request 10 million in aid to both Chicago and Detroit. And 100 trillion for Ukraine.

Meanwhile in Gary, Indiana, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot who only sustained minor injuries was arrested by Secret Service after she threatened Biden with, "I'm gonna go to DC and shove a stick of dynamite up that senile motherfucker's ass and lite it."

And in Minneapolis Antifa and TRANS activists were hold a rally, burning buildings down, raping motorists and their pets when rogue Minn National Guard members showed with flame throwers and....
 
"Nuclear disarmament" is a farce and only gets people killed. This is the exact reason Ukraine is having trouble with Russia right now; idiots in Ukraine's govt. back in the 1990s listened to the rest of the world and got rid of their nukes and believed promises by the rest of the world to protect them from Russia in exchange.

Those promises are and were, worthless.
 
God fucking damnit. That's all I have to say about this.

Trying to think of a silver lining... Hmm, oh okay, maybe we could revive Freeman Dyson and et. al.'s Project Orion spacecraft propulsion? Getting to Alpha Centauri in a bit over 100 years could be huge for humanity... :optimistic:
If any star were reachable within a human lifespan we'd have already started doing it, I swear. Humans are so shortsighted.
 
They don't mention who is building all the new nukes. It's China. China is going to quadrupole their nuclear stockpile over the next 7 years.
 
"Nuclear disarmament" is a farce and only gets people killed. This is the exact reason Ukraine is having trouble with Russia right now; idiots in Ukraine's govt. back in the 1990s listened to the rest of the world and got rid of their nukes and believed promises by the rest of the world to protect them from Russia in exchange.

Those promises are and were, worthless.

Yup, while their attackers are protected by the fact that they can start WW3 if anyone were to overtly act against them.
 
Yup, while their attackers are protected by the fact that they can start WW3 if anyone were to overtly act against them.
It was idiots listening to idiots. It wasn't just Ukraine's politicians at the time who were idiots. The people they were listening to (FRANCE, FFS, GERMANY. Also USA and Canada - and Canada is FULL of idiots in govt. Source: Am Leaf) were also fucking exceptional individuals who are either really really stupid, really really shortsighted, both, or did it on purpose.

If they were stealth commie/NDP/Green, they did it on purpose. And they're STILL idiots.

I mean hell, just recently a former Liberal Foreign Affairs minister from the early 2000s (Bill Graham, not to be confused with Billy Graham) just passed away, and that idiot is getting accolades. He didn't do ANYTHING right, as I recall.
 
I find hilarious how other countries only have like 100 maybe 200 ish and then there's the US and Russia with 5000+ each. They really were prepared to send eachother to hell if shit went south back in the 60's.
 
Doubt anyone will ever use them unless some crazed religious zealot dune coon gets their hand on one. Since most of those groups are pretty much dead or weakened now, I would say the chances of that are pretty slim. Russia and China aren't going to nuke anyone. The US certainly isn't going to do it. I don't see France or anyone else doing it either. It's just a bunch of fear mongering BS. Considering how shit tier Russia's military is they are probably going to hold onto their nuclear weapons for as long as they can because it's the only deterrent they have against an invasion. Their army is pretty much a joke at this point. Getting defeated by a minor regional power (Ukraine) is going to do that.
 
I find hilarious how other countries only have like 100 maybe 200 ish and then there's the US and Russia with 5000+ each. They really were prepared to send eachother to hell if shit went south back in the 60's.
I have to wonder how many were ever really prepared to launch, though. Not like you need more than a few hundred even 'tactical' nuclear warheads to completely remove the enemies ability to operate militarily or functionally. Unless either side was actually willing to target every single square inch of land that could be turned into scorched earth. Nowadays, the supposed amount of operational silos in the US at least is said to be 400, probably less. This does ignore what subs can carry, along with anything mobile.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo