Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
It sucks they’ve gone in the direction they have. I think it could have been really interesting if the movies were retellings of the games but coherently and with the knowledge that the later games brought being used to forshadow. Say what you want about the original 6 games, I believe that Scott did a pretty decent job wrapping it all up in the end of FFPS. It was a story of a son seeking to rectify the mistakes he and his father made and putting an end to a never ending cycle of tragedy.
Instead, the movies are about some perpetually sleepy jobber who dreams about children and has to worry about his younger sister running around a pizza joint. It felt like they shoved everything the games had into one movie.
“Oh hey remember Vanessa? Oh now she’s actually Afton’s daughter who’s helping him but now she regrets it.”
“Hey look it’s William Afton! He said his funny line and now is wearing the golden bunny suit, isn’t that so cool?”
There’s no air of mystery anymore. Everything has to be spelled out because kids are stupid.
Rate me autistic but I’m very excited. Don’t care to criticize it, just want to see a game series I like come to the big screen again. Probably cause I’ve had a shitty week, but I’m just happy to watch something based around something I like. I’m probably the only one in this thread with this mindset.
Rate me autistic but I’m very excited. Don’t care to criticize it, just want to see a game series I like come to the big screen again. Probably cause I’ve had a shitty week, but I’m just happy to watch something based around something I like. I’m probably the only one in this thread with this mindset.
There's too much subversive and malicious garbage out there actively made by people who want me dead and hate the franchise they're involved with. In all honesty, I appreciate honest slop rather than high quality poison.
Rate me autistic but I’m very excited. Don’t care to criticize it, just want to see a game series I like come to the big screen again. Probably cause I’ve had a shitty week, but I’m just happy to watch something based around something I like. I’m probably the only one in this thread with this mindset.
I enjoyed the first one for what it was. Sure this might lead me to have higher expectations for the second one, but it would take a lot to make me actively hate it.
Movie is decent, but damn it really is meant for people who watched the first one. If you go into this one blind you won't know WTF is going on. I think a movie like this that is really lore focused (and then subsequent sequels) really needs a 'recap' or 'previously on' segment because it gets really autistic at this point with the intricate details of how things go on (like Afton starts off as a murderer, gets killed, then now becomes Springtrap, etc.) shit like that is a lotta layers for a Blumhouse film.
The first one was campy and stood apart from the games in a way that wasn't a repeat of Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. That has to count for something. I expect at best this to be shoulder-to-shoulder.
It turns out FNAF is what we needed to built the ethnostate all along.
As for the movie, it wasn't great, but I appreciate that it was unabashedly Christian and anti-woke. Hopefully it'll inspire a few tards to pick up the good book.
I mean...yeah. Why would you watch a movie with a big fat "2" on it before the first one? I see this kind of statement for any sort of sequel these days and there's just no excuse with movies or video games or shows where accessing them is a non-issue for essentially anyone.
sorry, bad wording on my part. what i meant is, there's a school in the 90s that's 75% nonwhite that has a robotics class? ghetto schools barely had food, much less robots back then
they barely have food now, but i could see some Bill Gates-type anti-racist grants that give them robots to hit with rocks for personal amusement now
Did they even try to make this movie scarier than the first like they claimed, or is it like the reviews claimed, nothing but slop for Game Theory watchers and people with an autistic obsession with FNAF World easter eggs?
I've also heard complaints from lorefags that the characters aren't like how they assumed them to be namely Michael Afton and Charlie/the Puppet but thats less of what I'm curious about.
yes. there are several parts of the movie where she’s running around and doing her own thing and a big theme of the movie is dealing with her “trauma”
unfortunately she’s not attractive or competent enough to be a femme fatale and she’s not interesting enough to be an antihero and they cut her off from being the standard love interest. she just runs around whining about her family and that no one understands her
it’s too bad because the guy and his sister are still pretty solid characters but they start to get overshadowed by the writer’s basic bitch self insert
Just saw it for free, just as bad if not worse than the first one. Same boring main cast and everything. The only thing I liked was that Wayne Knight got work.
Just saw it for free, just as bad if not worse than the first one. Same boring main cast and everything. The only thing I liked was that Wayne Knight got work.
yes. there are several parts of the movie where she’s running around and doing her own thing and a big theme of the movie is dealing with her “trauma”
unfortunately she’s not attractive or competent enough to be a femme fatale and she’s not interesting enough to be an antihero and they cut her off from being the standard love interest. she just runs around whining about her family and that no one understands her
it’s too bad because the guy and his sister are still pretty solid characters but they start to get overshadowed by the writer’s basic bitch self insert
That sounds eerily familiar to the first book "The Silver Eyes". Charlie was the main focus of almost all of it and you wind up learning more about her than the animatronics. By the time you even get to them, you're almost finished with the book.
yes. there are several parts of the movie where she’s running around and doing her own thing and a big theme of the movie is dealing with her “trauma”
unfortunately she’s not attractive or competent enough to be a femme fatale and she’s not interesting enough to be an antihero and they cut her off from being the standard love interest. she just runs around whining about her family and that no one understands her
it’s too bad because the guy and his sister are still pretty solid characters but they start to get overshadowed by the writer’s basic bitch self insert