Science Experts find cavemen ate mostly vegan, debunking paleo diet

Link (Archive)

Experts find cavemen ate mostly vegan, debunking paleo diet​

A new study has debunked the general meal plan behind the Paleo diet, with findings suggesting that some Stone Age people ate a mostly vegan diet.

According to the Harvard School of Public Health, the Paleo diet was adapted to mimic the nutritional plan adopted until 2000 BC.

“The Paleo diet, also referred to as the caveman or Stone-Age diet, includes lean meats, fish, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds,” the University explains. “Proponents of the diet emphasise choosing low-glycemic fruits and vegetables.”

Most of the diet is centered around protein intake, promoting the consumption of grass-fed beef for its omega-3 content. In general, the idea is to consume the foods that were available during the Paleolithic period for health benefits since “our genetics and anatomy have changed very little” from that time, per the HSPH.

Now, a study published by the Nature Ecology & Evolution Journal researched and analysed the chemical signatures of the Paleolithic group, the Iberomaurusians, specifically within bones and teeth. Their findings suggest the general idea of meat being the primary source of protein during this time isn’t valid.

Stable isotope analysis was used, focusing on the nitrogen and zinc isotopes in teeth enamel and collagen to look at the meat consumption associated with the Iberomaurusians, as well as carbon isotopes to discover whether meat or fish was the primary source of protein.

“Our analysis showed that these hunter-gatherer groups, they included an important amount of plant matter, wild plants to their diet, which changed our understanding of the diet of pre-agricultural populations,” Zineb Moubtahij, the lead author for the study stated.

Additionally, researchers saw an abundance of cavities in the buried remains in the Taforalt caves, the places where Iberomaurusians would lay the dead to rest. According to the study, these cavities suggested the consumption of “fermentable starchy plants” like beets, corn, rye, and cassava.

Klervia Jaouen, a co-author of the study, noted that the “high proportion of plants in the diet of a pre-agricultural population” was “unusual”. However, their findings weren’t indicative of the protein intake for all individuals in the Stone Age.

Still, Jaouen pointed out that this was the first finding by isotope techniques that saw a “significant plant-based component in a Palaeolithic diet”.
 
This three word phrase is quickly soaring to the #1 spot in "worst three-word phrases in the English languge", contending with standout and long-time contestants "we need funding", "diversity is strength", "she looked eighteen", and "reasonable gun control".

Competition is fierce in this century but I think "A new study" can pull ahead.
 
Paleo, at least when I looked into it a decade ago, was mostly about just eating better quality and less processed food. It tended towards more protein and less carbs, but they loved their sweet potatoes. I don't recall a lot of focus on eating raw meat, just eating better quality grass-fed and avoiding PUFA heavy seed oils. Mark Sisson was a big name there, he's in his 70s I think and last I saw a picture of him he looked fantastic for his age. Meanwhile every Vegan I see looks like they just got out of Auschwitz.
 
30g of Protein, hilarious. No wonder Vegans look like AIDS patients.
This doesn't include the fact nutritional info is only based on gross average levels and has nothing to do with bioavailability through digestion. That 30g of plant protein is processed into less than 20 when digested. Vegans are so fucking retarded they place themselves lower than plants on the food chain. Plants love animal dung, blood, bones, etc as fertilizer.
 
There's no such thing as "mostly vegan" unless you're an editor trying to get a clickbaity but shorter title for your article. You're either Vegan, or you're not.
 
Sounds like the paper is confusing the Paleo and Carnivore diets. My understanding is that Paleo has plenty of nuts, fruits and veggies.. just no dairy, grains and beans. And no processed foods.
Paleo allows for dairy, but depends on an individual's tolerance of it. As a general rule they avoid it, but it's not strictly prohibited.
 
Veganism, along with urbanism, is a pet peeve of mine lately. Both trends attract self-righteous proselytizers that would have been just as obnoxious religious zealots in the olden days. They have two main arguments — equating human life with that of the rest of the animal kingdom and health benefits. The first seems to mostly stem from self-loathing extended to humanity as a whole, the other is based on studies that conveniently happen to confound red meat with processed red meat products and other such nonsense. Truly, I can't think of a more loathsome group of people other than exhibitionist AIDS patients.
 
Still, Jaouen pointed out that this was the first finding by isotope techniques that saw a “significant plant-based component in a Palaeolithic diet”.
Human beings are opportunistic eaters. I'm sure if they did a study in Siberia or northern Europe or most of North America it would turn out they ate a lot of protein, whether in the form of goats, sheep, caribou, bison, etc., that would certainly differ, but not the fact that it was meat they were eating.

We know the traditional Inuit, Mongolian, and East African diet was primarily meat, not sure why it would not also have been that in an earlier era.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo