Disaster employee terminated Trump's twitter on his last day - #Woke af

Article

An employee deactivated the@realdonaldtrump account, it said, clarifying that it had been their last day in the job.

The account was down for 11 minutes and Twitter is now investigating.

Tweets from Mr Trump, who has 41.7 million followers, have frequently caused controversy.

The latest incident has sparked debate about the security of the president's account, given the potential consequences of posts falsely attributed to Mr Trump being published.


However, @POTUS, the official account of the US president, was unaffected.

'Last day'
On Thursday evening, visitors to Mr Trump's page for a short time could only see a message that read "Sorry, that page doesn't exist!"

_98594690_capture1.png
Image copyrightTWITTER
Image captionDonald Trump has been actively using Twitter to promote his policies and attack his opponents
After the account was restored, Mr Trump's first tweet was about the Republican Party's tax cuts plan.

Twitter said it was investigating the problem and taking steps to avoid it happening again.

It later said: "Through our investigation we have learned that this was done by a Twitter customer support employee who did this on the employee's last day. We are conducting a full internal review."




End of Twitter post by @realDonaldTrump

It said that Mr Trump's tweet was "newsworthy".

In some of his other most controversial tweets:


Mr Trump's allies have also got into hot water over their use of Twitter.

Roger Stone, who advised him during his election campaign, was suspended from the network after he used abusive and homophobic language to target journalists, including a gay CNN presenter, Don Lemon.

He said he had been told by Twitter that he had violated its rules.

Mr Stone said he would sue Twitter for blocking his account.
 
The pettiness and unprofessionalism by those who cannot keep their jobs and personal views separate no longer surprises me.

They don't have to, they know that everyone is so wrapped up in their politics that they'll be welcomed with open arms by their opposites, the person who did this has probably put it on their resume.
 
Claiming victory because you got your enemy's twitter down for 11 minutes before everything is restored and he isn't harmed at all is like clicking like on a feminism poster on facebook and thinking you're doing something to help gender equality.
What's your implication sportsfan? Do you really think all of those petitions would do that? Just get posted on the internet and be a lie?
 
Well at least they wanted to be stupid and go out with a bang of stupidity. Shame that they will NEVER work in the industry ever again.
 
This moron changed years of positive employment references for 11 minutes of petty revenge against a man who has done him no harm personally. Pathetic.
What a terrible thing to say! Drumpf took six million years off this man's life from psychological trauma requiring Lego playtime and therapy dogs weeks after his election.

I suppose now he has a lot more extra time to scream at the sky.
 
im sure many people creamed their pants when they heard his twitter was deleted

i also creamed my pants at the thought of this guy being blacklisted from working in any tech jobs in the near future
 
A lot of tech jobs are so full of sjws due to "diversity hiring" that it might actually increase the chances of him getting hired.

Mostly at companies that have no future, though.

He should probably start a Patreon, though. He could probably get a grand for every minute ORANGE DRUMPFLER was down.
 
Trump absolutely blown the FUCK out! 11 minutes of social justice glory! How is Cheetoh Hitler going to recover from this!?
 
Twitter is run by unqualified children who put their views over professionalism. The people treating this employee like a hero don't know shit about politics; if you hate Trump so much then you clearly should be concerned with what he could do to your country, meaning you'd want to see his tweets, among other things. But no, they're all shallow and fake people who think they look good by jumping onto bandwagons.
 
This is why some employers just tell you to leave immediately the minute you put in your two weeks' notice.

It avoids last day shenanigans.
 
The rogue Twitter employee who deleted Trump's account could face hacking charges

Despite some onlookers calling him — or her — a hero, the anonymous Twitter employee who pulled the plug on President Trump's Twitter account Thursday night before leaving the company may want to lawyer up, according to experts on computer law.

Whether or not Twitter pursues legal action against its former worker, federal officials could be motivated to prosecute — if only to deter future cases, analysts say.

“If I were this employee, I'd be hiring a good criminal defense lawyer who knows something about the CFAA,” said Paul Ohm, a law professor at Georgetown University.

The CFAA — short for the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act — is the federal government's premiere anti-hacking law. It's been used, controversially, to go after information activists such asAaron Swartz as well as the former Reuters journalist Matthew Keys. And it gives the government wide latitude to pursue those who have allegedly accessed a computer “without authorization” or in ways that exceed the level of authorization they've been given.


“If this was beyond what the employee was authorized to do, one could argue he ‘exceeded authorized access,’ ” said Chris Calabrese, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology. He added: “[That's] a phrase we've critiqued, because it empowers private actors to exercise criminal penalties over what are essentially contractual/civil disputes.”


How much legal risk does Twitter's former employee really face in light of this law? That depends on a number of factors, chief among them being how difficult Twitter makes it for employees to deactivate user accounts.

Under one theory, the worker may not have violated the CFAA if Twitter's internal policies on the matter were lax or nonexistent. But the employee could be in much greater jeopardy if Twitter's policies were much more strict.

“If they have layer after layer of training and passwords and signs on the wall that say, ‘Do not delete accounts without permission or out of spite,’ ” said Ohm, “if they have anything like that, it becomes a much more prosecutable offense.”

Some reports suggest that while Twitter has some safeguards against employer misuse, the policies are not as robust as they could be. According to BuzzFeed, hundreds of Twitter employees have been given the permissions to unilaterally deactivate accounts, while still more workers can independently suspend accounts. Additional measures — perhaps requiring multiple people to sign off on the deletion of an account — were contemplated at one point, but were never put in place, BuzzFeed said, citing a former senior Twitter employee.

Benjamin Wittes, an expert on surveillance and law enforcement policy who runs the Lawfare blog in coordination with the Brookings Institution, said he agrees with many information security practitioners — the former Twitter employee is not safe.


At the very least, it seems like it could be a close call.
article
 
Atrás
Top Abajo