🌟 Internet Famous Emily Rose Youcis / @realemilyyoucis / "Pistachio Girl", creator of Alfred Alfer - e-famous animator, neo-nazi sperg who wants to be raped by Aryan men, peanut vendor

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
I think I found their problem.
Youcis has demonstrated that far-right creators can use AI to make good-enough entertainment, without needing to go through any gatekeeping institutions. And she’s proved that even people who don’t see themselves as bigots will watch this content—and in some cases laugh along.
Presiona para expandir...
Also funny to see how the left has gone from cultural trendsetters to tut tutting about the damn kids and their loud music. Even their young generation has lost its touch. All they have is some 70s radical cosplay and that's that.
 
My heckin' gatekeeping instututions!

As though underground printed (and pre-printed) material hasn't been a thing since time immemorial.

Shit, I have here in my house what were basically zines that were printed in 1968. Kick my fuckin' door in and haul me over to County.

This country was founded on underground lit.

One might make the argument that the actual, literal NEW TESTAMENT was some underground shit when it came out 2000 years ago.

Ironic that the people who come off here as fashy are the people who are assmad about someone saying the nigger word in an animated short on YouTube.

And this is still an absolute classic:

 
Mussolini’s Merkin dijo:
Im not sure. I think she’s probably put it aside to work on the Stancil stuff. A pity, I was looking forward to more Alfer.
Presiona para expandir...
I was actually impressed by some of the Alfred Alfer stuff she was working on and despite my gripes with AI, it was impressive how she was able to wrangle parts of it. Though I remember she had to completely manually animate a portion that AI struggled with if I recall.
 
Cedric_Eff dijo:
I was actually impressed by some of the Alfred Alfer stuff she was working on and despite my gripes with AI, it was impressive how she was able to wrangle parts of it. Though I remember she had to completely manually animate a portion that AI struggled with if I recall.
Presiona para expandir...

From what I remember reading she is still doing a lot of the key animation herself, then wrangling Sora to do the transitions between what she's already illustrated. It's really a very inventive way of using the AI, I think it's what keeps it from falling totally into that uncanny-valley AI animation style and still having the charm of being hand drawn.

There are some scenes are clearly all AI, she's talked about how hard it is to make Sora animate anything violent, which is why the blood always kind of looks like jelly.

As good as she has done with AI, I hope she doesn't move off the hand drawn stuff for Alfred Alfer, it's half the charm.
 
Loose Goose dijo:
I think I found their problem.

Also funny to see how the left has gone from cultural trendsetters to tut tutting about the damn kids and their loud music. Even their young generation has lost its touch. All they have is some 70s radical cosplay and that's that.
Presiona para expandir...
The SJWs have basically hit the moment where they're kind of like evangelicals were in the '80s, where their star starts to dim because their repulsively obnoxious and condescending behavior has completely turned people off from their message.

They've hit a point where even people otherwise inclined to agree with them on some general principles are sick of their total fanaticism, intolerance, and crybullying.
 
Mussolini’s Merkin dijo:
Does anyone know the history behind Youcis trolling Stancil? Seems to have been going on for years but I’ve no idea when or why it started.

I mean it’s not like you need some big reason to troll Stancil, he is soy made flesh, but I wondered if there was some story behind it.
Presiona para expandir...
I don't, but given how obtuse Will is and the content of her show, it seems like she wants to social media mind-rape him into being a White nationalist and fascist the way she was raped and chose fascism. If she were a man she'd probably just drive over to his place and rape him for real, but she's a woman and an artist so she's doing this instead. She probably thinks if she can accomplish this feat, it won't just make her one hell of an artist, it'll make her one hell of a propagandist. She will have raped a man into doing her bidding, without touching him, which incidentally means she'll have demonstrated more power than anyone who ever touched her.

The way Emily tweets to Will she treats him like a babe in the woods, and Will in her show is following the same story arc as Alfred. (I will bet my bottom dollar Will is portrayed as Jesus this Christmas.) She got fame and attention by putting her abuse on display through Alfred; Will gets fame and attention by societal-y cucking himself over and over on Twitter - with the same latent anger and lust for power. I think she sees herself in Will - like he is some egg a tranny would try to crack. So when Stancil got 'raped' by Grok, that sealed it. It fired up all the old creative juices in her and she immediately came out of retirement and started making this show. She wants to mindbreak/rape Will, which is why she's using the AI that raped him to do it. The more Will's presence online is owed solely to her and this show inflating it, the more raped he is, and the more he owes his fame to being raped. It's so full circle that she can't resist.

That's my theory anyway.
 
Would be really interested in a re-write. I tried skimming through the whole thread and it seems her footprint runs deep. I was wondering if there was anything more to her but from what I can tell she is just a women who was abused heavily during her childhood and tried drawing/making cartoons as an outlet but somehow eventually got wrapped up into politics and is a complete /pol/ pickme girl, even now.

I tried watching Alfreds Playhouse (because null insisted on it in the beginning of the thread) but couldn't get through the first 2-3 minutes but I got the gist. I then watched her last Newgrounds upload "The Ascent of Alfred" and I found it intriguing enough to watch all the way through, being made around 2016. To me, the way the main character is framed and the journey he goes through makes it appear as though youcis is making an interesting and artsy take on overdosing on memes and getting wrapped up in politics "for the meme". I tried finding more information or what Youcis felt about this animation and happened to find one over a year ago which makes it clear to me that no, there isn't any nuance, Youcis just really enjoyed /pol/ meme energy and felt it truly enlightened her. I find the Will Stancil stuff funny but reading her twitter just makes her seem like after all these years she hasn't really grown as a person and she stills talks and acts like an edgy shitposting teenager who desperately wants attention for doing so. It's sad because I think she does have some creative talent, I was genuinely impressed with the visuals for the ascent of Alfred. I'm curious to hear what Null thinks about her now, before looking much into her I know even in MATIs from the last year or two he's brought her up positively, though skimming through the thread his opinion of her seems to only sour around 2018 or so, where he was blatantly "simping" for her before that.

23rw34.png
 
I’d never heard of her until quite recently. I vaguely remembered something about her at the Phillies games but I couldn’t remember the neo Nazi part.

The Will Stancil show is hilarious. Funniest AI generated show with an actual plot that I’ve ever seen. Probably helps that Emily is already experienced in animation so she’s able to nudge it along. Her political views align closely with mine (tho I’ve been cooling it with the antisemitic remarks as of late). She has some kind of traumatic past and has psychiatric issues but so does Ye and he still made Graduation.
 
Apologies for double posting like a faggot, but reading this thread in 2026 is a surreal experience. For one, 2016 doesn't feel like a decade ago. It's interesting to watch how the conversation around white nationalism has evolved in the years since, because in 2016 posters on the thread defending Emily's views were mocked and derided, whereas now the entire concept of white ethnic replacement, non-white violence, even that the Holocaust was exaggerated are considered axiomatic assumptions of right wing thought and discussion in (historically) far more mainstream and far less tolerant spaces like X or YouTube. Spergy as they were, those old posts feel prophetic and largely vindicated. They prefigured a massive shift in the overton window that I believe can be credited in huge part to Donald Trump.
 
The Homelander dijo:
-snip-
Presiona para expandir...
2016 -> 2026 in general is one long maturation process of left-libertarians into right-fundamentalists and you can watch it unfold if you just jump between years on the forum or on 4plebs. It's basically all the Free Speech people realizing that with great power (I'm gonna say whatever I want and you can't stop me) comes great responsibility (to say whatever I want requires the continued political supremacy of my nation and tradition.)

Put that way the 'don't tread on me' ethos is unbroken and unwavering, just reacting to how the world has changed.
 
Legalize Asbestos dijo:
snip
Presiona para expandir...
Agreed, in a sense. The "don't tread on me" ethic endures but I believe as a Nietzschean inversion of itself (i.e. I will tread on you), and I say this as someone who went through this transformation from libertarian to Trumpist to whatever I am now. I agree entirely that this is a manifestation of the broad post-covid realization that your ability to be "left alone" (and by extension the existence of your values and vision for the world) is predicated upon your willingness to enforce that paradigm with violence. The racialism, antisemitism, nationalism are ideals that naturally find their way to people who embrace this, because fundamentally to make this kind of profound ideological transformation one must embrace the reality of hierarchy, order, and lose the notion of "both sides making good points".

Libertarianism is idealistic but ultimately a denial of reality. It's a meek request.
 
The Homelander dijo:
Libertarianism is idealistic but ultimately a denial of reality. It's a meek request.
Presiona para expandir...
Yeah I guess no one has an appetite for political philosophy or theology or anything these days, but Freedom and Power are synonyms. You aren't free to do anything if you don't have the power to do it or if someone with power isn't protecting you while you do it. That point never seems to be brought up. It's why even the most erstwhile anarcho-commies end up becoming authoritarians even if they refuse to acknowledge it as such. They need absolute power to enforce their vision and just get more and more coercive and dictatorial the more people resist their utopia. A demand for absolute freedom is a demand to be a tyrant over everyone else.
 
I somehow just learned about the modern politics podcast she does with her husband. I had seen the alfress's playhouse stuff she did, and then last year I saw the will stancil ai edits she did, and the other things she posted on her youtube channel ( the full house edit is still pretty funny to me).

Anyway, I finally ended up finding the modern politics podcast like I said. So far I've found it pretty enjoyable. It covers almost the same niche, of right leaning but critical of Trumps Israel influenced decisions, and other topics in that same vein. While not being done by the mexican catboy leader of the white race.

Just like with Fuentes I don't fully agree with their politics, I might even agree with Fuentes's politics a bit more, since I'm something like a libertarian, or some kind of contitutionalist (I'm not saying fuentes is a libertarian, just that some things he says aren't completely incompatible with libertarian ideas, some are. And other views seem to come from the same lolbert strawman place a lot of the further right leaning people have of libertarianism). But Fuentes just can't stop himself from making himself look as dumb as possible every chance he gets to stir up shit.

Either way there aren't really any echo chamber type podcasts I can listen to, I guess I have a wierd set of political beliefs. So I just have to take what I can get. I think it's probably a good thing to listen to people I don't 100% agree with anyway.
 
Última edición:
prollyanotherlurker dijo:
*snip*
Presiona para expandir...
I think you're doing something wrong if you find yourself agreeing with every single thing any given talking head espouses, so I think you're right about the lack of an echo chamber being good for your politics. It's also a positive reflection of you, too. Takes a real fucking goy to sit there and nod his head when his favorite yapper drops a heinous take.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo