Educate me about the Uniparty - I kind of get it, but tell me more

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
KiwiFuzz

KiwiFuzz

TERF IRL
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
19 de Jul, 2019
I feel like we are undergoing a major political shift, and I think there's a lot to be determined about how it's going to shake out. I see segments of the far left making common cause with the far right, and centrists engaging in unholy congress.

Powerlevel but I came of age in a time when Reagan was seen as a massive rightward shift, Bush I was seen as a continuation of what Reagan stood for, Clinton was seen as a reclamation of pre-Reagan leftist values, Bush II was seen as a rightward correction from Clinton, and Obama was seen as a strong leftward movement from Bush II.

Looking at it from today, can I really state what any of their policy differences were?

Yesterday on MSNBC there was a former Bush staffer interviewing Dick Cheney's daughter, and she was talking about a conversation she had with Condi Rice. And this is right after Kissenger croaked and Hillary said... whatever garbage she said.

The way they hyped all this, you'd think they were playing the Internationale as bumper music, but the North remembers.

Educate me, my based companions.
 

This is the Uniparty. The convergence of public (government officials and bureaucrats) and private (banks, corporations, etc.) interest trying to gain as much wealth and control over the average person. Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin in the pocket of some banker, CEO, investment tycoon, etc.
 
The Evil Midnight Bomber dijo:
It’s called consolidation. Strengthen governments and corporations, weaken individuals. With taxes, this can be done imperceptibly over time.
Presiona para expandir...
Taxes are one factor, inflation is the other. It is built into our financial system.
Your "democratic" power to have a vote among millions for two options every few years is no power at all.
Financial power is real power, and the lower class and middle class have very little of that left while corporations get stimulus payments out of tax-money.
Globalism has worsened this. Corporations had a natural growth-limit, the economy of one nation. With globalism, they can be present around the globe, and even if the product they produce is absolutely worthless, they can still have a quasi-monopoly on it by sheer size and influence alone.
Corporations are more powerful now than they were ever during laissez-faire. The whole world is controlled by an upper class of corporate management, mid-level bureaucrats and the professors that educated them.
 
The idea of the Uniparty is that there is an illusion of choice in American politics. The people you can vote to have been filtered to not rock the boat too much either way. Therefore no real change can be enacted, and any goal the uniparty strives for will come through in some way no matter what.

How much this is true is up to debate. On one extreme there can be an official Uniparty channel unknown to us plebs, on the other it might be an illusion due to Democracy already catering to centrists. As the elite political class is an aristocracy that we will never approach, we can only guess.
 
If you want to figure out what the Uniparty is and what they stand for, just think about some of the real issues we face in the country, and then try to find one single politician who is actively, honestly addressing that issue. Just off the top of my head, I can think of a few.

The national debt problem is the most obvious. Neither Republicans nor Democrats want to talk about it, neither of them even hint at wanting to get it under control. Some self-styled "conservatives" might pay lip-service to the issue, but none of them have an actual plan on how to address it, and once they get elected, they quickly drop the issue.

Our education system is another. The US education system is an abysmal failure at every level. Kids are coming out dumber than they were when they went in. More than half of all 8th grade children are illiterate. Most kids graduating high school can barely do basic math or arithmetic. Bullying and school violence are absolutely out of control. Students are being sexually molested by teachers at absurd rates. The school system is failing, despite the fact that we pump billions of dollars into it, and every year the school budget grows, but the problems get worse. Name me one single politician, Republican or Democrat, actually talking about this.

Racial animosity has gone into overdrive ever since Obama. Black people are free to say whatever they want about any non-black racial group. A black man can go online and openly say "I want to kill every last white person on Earth. I want a white genocide," and nobody will say anything. Meanwhile, Scott Adams says "you know, maybe we shouldn't live in the same cities with these people who actively despise us" and he's righteously cancelled by every company that every worked with him. Black people can openly call for racial extermination, but if a white person even suggests that blacks are a little bit rowdy, they are quickly destroyed. Not one single politician wants to address this.

Welfare abuse is rampant. Oftentimes you can make more money by mooching off welfare than you can by working a full-time job. It's incredibly easy to abuse the system. It's particularly prevalent in the black community, where black whore women will have as many kids as possible with 5 different men and just use them to get more gibs from their sugar daddy Uncle Sam. Single-parenthood is off the charts, and more children are growing up in broken homes than ever before. Not a peep from our elected officials.

The birth rate is rapidly approaching sub-replacement levels. Fewer people than ever before are getting married, and even among those who are getting married, many of them are choosing to not have children. Before you say this isn't a problem, consider the fact that, not too long ago, it was reported that nearly 30% of young adult men (that is, men between the ages of 18-30) are abstaining from relationships altogether. Not looking but unable, but simply not even participating at all. The media response to this alarming figure was open mockery and scorn towards men. Similar to racial animosity, there is an arguably greater amount of hatred between women and men. Nobody wants to talk about it.

The border doesn't exist anymore. Illegal aliens are allowed to just waltz in at will, and it's not just Mexicans. People are flying into Mexico from all over the world just so they can freely walk into the country. The one politician who actually wanted to do something about it is currently being railroaded by the entire establishment, which is doing everything in its power to stop this man from ever attaining power.

I could go on and on, but I'd be writing an entire novel, and I think you get the picture by now. Think about every issue that the common citizen has, and then think about how many of those issues are even being talked about, let alone addressed by any of our elected officials. It's not what is said, but what isn't, that defines the uniparty.
 
KiwiFuzz dijo:
I feel like we are undergoing a major political shift, and I think there's a lot to be determined about how it's going to shake out. I see segments of the far left making common cause with the far right, and centrists engaging in unholy congress.

Powerlevel but I came of age in a time when Reagan was seen as a massive rightward shift, Bush I was seen as a continuation of what Reagan stood for, Clinton was seen as a reclamation of pre-Reagan leftist values, Bush II was seen as a rightward correction from Clinton, and Obama was seen as a strong leftward movement from Bush II.

Looking at it from today, can I really state what any of their policy differences were?

Yesterday on MSNBC there was a former Bush staffer interviewing Dick Cheney's daughter, and she was talking about a conversation she had with Condi Rice. And this is right after Kissenger croaked and Hillary said... whatever garbage she said.

The way they hyped all this, you'd think they were playing the Internationale as bumper music, but the North remembers.

Educate me, my based companions.
Presiona para expandir...
- the far left and right are not making common cause, the left is not even hating Jews for the same reasons as the right, the left judges things on power and oppression, the right on ethnicity
- those claims about American presidents are all 1000% lunacy, Reagan was a libertarian and economic right winger, Bush a glowie neocon, Clinton a neoliberal, so economically right wing, wars - also right wing, Bush II neocon lunatic, Obama a neoliberal that was at first anti-gay, he has no personal opinions other than being a face to the faceless machinations of the administrative state. Wars continued; economy remained purely right wing.
- policies are mostly similar on all important issues, as you noticed. Nobody touches the money. Nobody stops the wars.
- MSNBC, Fox etc. are party-linked media enterprises, they have a job, to create polarization and propaganda against the competition. I'll give you one good example.
Fox News loved RFK Jr. while he was a Dem and dunking on other Dems. The moment he went independent and started to pose a threat to independents and right wingers that would vote Rep, Hannity and Waters attacked him really hard, including accusations of Epstein plane and so on. No mercy against competition.
The uniparty doesn't really exist; what exists is the empire and its interests, and the administrative state managing the impossibly complex structures of the empire. Money must flow; geopolitics much happen.
There are many conspiracy theories around the nature of this shapeshifting apolitical organism. I'll just leave them out to not create drama, but some of them have actually factual, data-based assumptions at their core that are objectively true.
 
They want your balls, they want your dick, and they won't stop until they suck you dry.
 
One thing I often like to bring up that's tangential to this, is how much the NDAA 2012 and 2013 really fucked us. It was something I warned people about at the time, and got shrugs and fluoride stares at, at the time, but it's playing out about how I expected it to.

The NDAA for FY 2012 introduced us to an Act designed to be an unequivocal affirmation of the Authorization for Use of Military Force law's provision to detain U.S. citizens living on American soil, indefinitely. It was introduced in response to 9/11, and allowed for the indefinite detention of those suspected of "domestic terrorism". NDAA 2012 makes it very clear that this is meant for U.S. Citizens, which the original bill apparently did not emphasize enough. What should worry you is how the U.S. Government typically defines terrorism. You are all no doubt on a terror watchlist. Luckily, you can FOIA your FBI dossier for only 15 dollars. Go on, find out what they know about you.

The Smith-Mundt Act Modernization Act of 2012, introduced in NDAA 2013 was a complete gutting of the landmark Anti-Propaganda bill which prohibited the dissemination of state-run (((media and information))) targeted for foreign and domestic people, or as it should be more clearly understood, propaganda. Under the Modernization Act, these restrictions no longer apply, and the government can now use taxpayer dollars to manufacture foreign and domestic US propaganda, all at your expense!

The NDAA is an omnibus, so it's chock full of shit worth worrying about that neither you nor the people who voted for it actually know what's inside. One of these is passed every Fiscal Year.

Funny how propaganda mills, like ShareBlue, started really picking up steam, shortly after 2013.

Some of you think that things really started going to shit right around the early 2010s. This is one very big reason why.


This isn't directly related to the uniparty as a concept, but these are undoubtedly some of their strongest tools right now.
 
Última edición:
Looks a little like this:

0002.jpg
 
If you want to undsrstand the uniparty, you have to understand the deep state.

If you want to understand the deep state, you have to understand that under Bush jr, there was a program for "continuation of government". Its stated goal was that if the entire US government was blown up or otherwise succesfully eliminated, that governing could continue succesfully. An entie underground bunker the size of a city was designated for this that has a population about equal to the US government at that time.

Due to its immense scope, it would require a vote every six months for continuation. Such vote was never once taken, yet it has continued from Bush's day until present day. It does not require any special secret documents to prove this either. This perspective is completely supported by articles in mainstream news that are publically available for you to verify for yourself. Just check the sources list of the "lifting the veil" book by timothy silver.

When you understand and accept that there is a complete shadow government / deep state, you start to understand what's in the front is mostly window dressing.

Whether you call that uniparty, democrats, republicans, it doesn't really matter. I suppose it's good when people learn that their choice matters very little.

1627654215396.png
 
Kumquat dijo:
I could go on and on, but I'd be writing an entire novel, and I think you get the picture by now. Think about every issue that the common citizen has, and then think about how many of those issues are even being talked about, let alone addressed by any of our elected officials. It's not what is said, but what isn't, that defines the uniparty.
Presiona para expandir...
None of them actually want (or care) to understand the concept of the Internet with free expression and archival information. You literally have old people in charge of something they don't even understand. The one thing that is seemingly protecting the right of a free Internet, Section 230, is being considered for removal without any notion of reform.
 
Sand Mega dijo:
I'm liking this thread, are there any books that tackle these issues?
Presiona para expandir...
Big Israel -Grant F. Smith
Biggest most powerful lobby, it's bigger and more powerful than you think.

Compromised -Terry Reed
Iran Contra is a great case that makes it easy to glimpse into the bowels of the government

CIA as Organized crime -Doug Valentine
Really good book about the glowinthedarkniggers.

If you have an understanding of the MOB and the Spooks and the fact that they aren't really separate entities, then you know what the Uniparty really is.

A fantastic book illustrating how the Mob and the Spooks are joined at the hip is
A Warning From History -Cory Hughes
How the Spooks and the Mobsters got rid of JFK.
It's advanced JFK research, and you should at least know some of the basics of the official story and the popular conspiracy story.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo