EU Dutch doctors euthanize child under 12 in first-of-its-kind case - Kill your babies to make space for niggers.

1000004630.jpg

Terminally ill child put to death under the Netherlands’ expanded euthanasia law, marking first reported case involving minor under 12 and reigniting fierce debate over children's suffering and assisted dying; case referred to public prosecutor’s office

For the first time since the expansion of the Netherlands’ euthanasia law, a child under the age of 12 has been euthanized, according to a letter sent by Dutch Health Minister Sophie Hermans to parliament presenting the annual report of the committee that reviews all late-term abortions and assisted deaths involving children.

According to a report by People, the child underwent euthanasia at the end of 2025 following a severe illness. No further details about the child’s identity or medical condition were released. The case has been referred to the public prosecutor’s office, in accordance with standard procedure under Dutch law for all euthanasia cases. The purpose of the review is to ensure that physicians complied with all legal requirements and procedures. The committee also said it had spoken with the doctor involved and will forward its findings to the authorities.

This is the first reported case of euthanasia involving a child under 12 since the law was expanded in 2024. The Netherlands was the first country in the world to legalize voluntary euthanasia after the law took effect in April 2002.

The ethical debate

Prof. Yechiel Bar-Ilan, an internist and lecturer in medical ethics at Tel Aviv University’s Faculty of Medicine, says the issue of euthanasia for children in the Netherlands has been the subject of public and moral controversy for years.

“In the Netherlands, there is a long tradition of tolerance and relatively broad medical autonomy. In the early 2000s, data published in the Netherlands showed that in rare cases of infants suffering from particularly severe illnesses, there were also deliberate actions taken to shorten life, and in some cases these were not even reported to authorities. Following this, efforts were made to regulate the issue through legislation and oversight, but even today it remains a controversial matter,” he said.

“In Israel, this is completely prohibited by law," according to Bar-Ilan. "Even if there is criticism of the current law, the approach in Israel is very different from that of some European countries. In the Netherlands and Belgium, for example, there are cases in which doctors and families jointly make decisions based on an assessment that continued life involves severe suffering with no real prospect of improvement.”

1000004631.jpg
Prof. Yechiel Bar ilan


Bar-Ilan noted that different countries have different approaches to extreme cases involving infants and premature babies with very low chances of survival or a risk of severe disability. “In the Netherlands, general practitioners have a very central role. They accompany patients over many years, visit their homes and are deeply involved in the decision-making process together with families. This is part of a different medical and social tradition than the one familiar in Israel,” he explained.

However, he stressed that his personal position is clear: “There is a difference between a decision not to prolong life at any cost in a person with a terminal illness and an active action intended to bring about death.”

At what age can euthanasia be requested?

According to the Dutch government website, minors can request euthanasia from the age of 12, provided they are able to understand the meaning of the decision and its implications. Children aged 12 to 15 require the consent of their parents or guardians. Those aged 16 and 17 must involve their parents in the decision-making process, but do not require their consent.

In 2024, the law was expanded to include children under 12 in cases where the child is “terminally ill and suffering unbearably with no prospect of improvement,” according to the Dutch government website. In such cases, the decision is made jointly by the physician and the parents. “This decision is always made in consultation with the parents and, if possible, also with the child,” the government states.

When the expansion was approved, Dutch authorities estimated there would be between five and 10 cases of euthanasia involving children each year. The current case is the first to be reported since the new framework came into effect.

Link / Archive
 
According to the Dutch government website, minors can request euthanasia from the age of 12, provided they are able to understand the meaning of the decision and its implications. Children aged 12 to 15 require the consent of their parents or guardians. Those aged 16 and 17 must involve their parents in the decision-making process, but do not require their consent.
This sounds like an argument for pedophila.

Its always curious to me how comfortable the medical establishment at using pedophilec terms to justify mutilation of children (trans surgery) and now even killing them.
 
severe illness
I'd need more information what was that, there's normal "severe brain cancer" and there's clown world "severe depression".
That's the most Dutch name I have ever read. Maybe we should euthanize him first
Guy is not really connected to the case in any way, it's an Israeli site asking a local doctor about his take.
 
The Dutch government hid the identities of the parents, the child and the doctors.

The hid the incident (which happened in 2025) till now

They hid all information on the illness too
How long before they start using MAID as a way to get rid of muslim rape gang victims before they go public? Wouldn't be too difficult and you'll have a willing provider of bodies once they age out of child prostitution.
 
Terminally ill child put to death under the Netherlands’ expanded euthanasia law,
Well, it's difficult when it's a terminal illness.
This kid would never become an adult, that's rough.
I hope the child had some sort of say in the matter though.
the child underwent euthanasia at the end of 2025 following a severe illness. No further details about the child’s identity or medical condition were released
NOW WAIT A MOTHERFUCKING MINUTE!!!
Then how can we know if the kid was sick at all?
Not releasing the information will make many of us treat this as the post-birth abortion that we used to make jokes about.
 
That's the most Dutch name I have ever read. Maybe we should euthanize him first
Yeah but...
“In Israel, this is completely prohibited by law," according to Bar-Ilan.

However, he stressed that his personal position is clear: “There is a difference between a decision not to prolong life at any cost in a person with a terminal illness and an active action intended to bring about death.”
Jews morally beat wooden shoe wearers on this issue.
 
According to the Dutch government website, minors can request euthanasia from the age of 12, provided they are able to understand the meaning of the decision and its implications. Children aged 12 to 15 require the consent of their parents or guardians. Those aged 16 and 17 must involve their parents in the decision-making process, but do not require their consent.
Wait a god damn second here: 12-15 year old can request it if they know what it means but for 16-17 year old they have toinvovle the parents. What the actual fuck? Shouldn't the parents alwaqys be part of this if the children are not of age?

What's that got to do with Balr0g's proposal?
I misunderstood that part. So that particular doctor should be left alone. But in general: if any doctor says we sahould be able to euthanize children needs to be euthanized themselves. Or ar ethey saying the Nazis were right about that? Huh...Hitler was rtight...again?
 
Euthanasia should be available on demand for anyone of any age. No doctor's checks, no psychiatrist, no religious figures. Let me walk into a suicide booth like it's Futurama
theres literally nothing stopping you from killing yourself right now. Not sure why people want to involve others into their suicide. Whaaa life too hard i wanna kms but wont go through the process of simply jumping off a high building or making a knot. Unless were talking literal vegetable that cant even move itself or being hooked up to life saving machine, euthanasia shouldnt even be discussed. All this shit talk about dying with dignity is bullshit.
 
they're fucking under 12
just hop them up on pain killers and let them do what they want before the end
We can't do that, what if he gets addicted? Best we can do is killing him.
A child is incapable of having a say.
They aren't developed enough to do so.

Which is why pedophile is rape no matter what
So you think a child's objection to being killed should be ignored? That can be applied to pedophilia just as easily. "The child doesn't want to get raped but it's just a kid so it doesn't matter what it wants"
Wait a god damn second here: 12-15 year old can request it if they know what it means but for 16-17 year old they have toinvovle the parents. What the actual fuck? Shouldn't the parents alwaqys be part of this if the children are not of age?
The parents are involved, it says parental consent is needed for 12-15yo where as the parents just need to be "involved"(whatever that means) for 16-17.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo