dumbass posted his own video then deleted

Destacado
RandomFarmeroni dijo:
I actually do feel bad. I genuinely just wanted discussion, I guess i shouldn't do it in form of a YT video. Everywhere I "shilled" it to I talked and debated with others who commented. That was the point. Anyways, note taken.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm pretty sure we already have a free speech discussion thread. If not, you could have created one where we debate why free speech is necessary or not. But you didn't do that, you expected us to watch your video and comment on it. I know I already posted this advice on your profile, but you need to lurk more.
 
RandomFarmeroni dijo:
I actually do feel bad. I genuinely just wanted discussion, I guess i shouldn't do it in form of a YT video. Everywhere I "shilled" it to I talked and debated with others who commented. That was the point. Anyways, note taken.
Presiona para expandir...
You're a new user, and you didn't lurk at all to get a feel for the place. You just went to Deep Thoughts immediately and posted you youtube channel. How could we not think your a shill.
 
My guess he's a psuedo libertarian or just a Sargon wannabe trying to shill his videos to any forum possible. Try again.
 
Gwyllgi dijo:
Ew, what's with the tongue-clicky, wet-mouthed lispy voice?
Presiona para expandir...

It's a muzzy. Generations of incest give them weird mouths sometimes so he probably can't help it.

---


>both right and left side are bad

Based muslim horseshoe theorist, using a destiny quote about sargon as evidence of "right wing is against free speech"

I mean, I'm not saying they are fundamentally for it, it's just that you used an exeptionally squared example to then claim "no big political entity really cares about free speech".

----

Also the idea that free speech protects anyone is pretty fucking fantastical. Ask Assange how that works out, when he exposed DNC corruption. Or Andrew Breitbart, when he exposed that politics is downstream from culture. Or Daphne Caruana Galizia, who published the Panama Papers.

And then to make that shitty ass video and think you're being thunk provoking. Why not try and ask some questions before you try to supply some answers?
 
BTW, finally watched the whole video.
Some notes:

1) Destiny is a fucking liar and you can't take anything he says at face value. I highly doubt Count Dankula would be celebrating his ban from Twitter.

2) Neither Sargon nor Ben Shapiro are right wing. Sargon is an outspoken "classic liberal", and Shapiro is a lefty Jew infiltrator.
 
Lemmingwise dijo:
It's a muzzy. Generations of incest give them weird mouths sometimes so he probably can't help it.

---


>both right and left side are bad

Based muslim horseshoe theorist, using a destiny quote about sargon as evidence of "right wing is against free speech"

I mean, I'm not saying they are fundamentally for it, it's just that you used an exeptionally squared example to then claim "no big political entity really cares about free speech".

----

Also the idea that free speech protects anyone is pretty fucking fantastical. Ask Assange how that works out, when he exposed DNC corruption. Or Andrew Breitbart, when he exposed that politics is downstream from culture. Or Daphne Caruana Galizia, who published the Panama Papers.

And then to make that shitty ass video and think you're being thunk provoking. Why not try and ask some questions before you try to supply some answers?
Presiona para expandir...
What I meant by protecting is that you can change someone mind about a topic, which would protect him from radicalizing further. This would not be possible if one of the parties in the conversation is not able to speak his mind.

Your other criticism, as I understand it, is that my example is somehow insufficient for my claim. Sure, I agree that maybe my statement is a bit too broad. But I think the example still stands.
I'd like to ask you what kind of example would be sufficient, if this one isn't? And if my statement is wrong, can you point to one big left or right wing political entity that cares about free speech?
 
NOT Sword Fighter Super dijo:
BTW, finally watched the whole video.
Some notes:

1) Destiny is a fucking liar and you can't take anything he says at face value. I highly doubt Count Dankula would be celebrating his ban from Twitter.

2) Neither Sargon nor Ben Shapiro are right wing. Sargon is an outspoken "classic liberal", and Shapiro is a lefty Jew infiltrator.
Presiona para expandir...
1) Could you point to any evidence that he lies? I guess if you go search hard enough you can find stuff he's wrong about, but i've never really seen him outright lie. It would be nice if you can support that claim.

2) So you take what Sargon says at face value, but you won't do the same for Shapiro? He is an outspoken conservative. Also classical liberal is still economically and philosophically on the right. I'm guessing you're an american and that's why you think the opposite, but it's simply not true.
 
RandomFarmeroni dijo:
1) Could you point to any evidence that he lies? I guess if you go search hard enough you can find stuff he's wrong about, but i've never really seen him outright lie. It would be nice if you can support that claim.

2) So you take what Sargon says at face value, but you won't do the same for Shapiro? He is an outspoken conservative. Also classical liberal is still economically and philosophically on the right. I'm guessing you're an american and that's why you think the opposite, but it's simply not true.
Presiona para expandir...
Wow, you really are dense. If you want to see evidence of Destiny lying, we have a 144 page thread about him. To sum it up though, he will argue in bad faith which means he'll lie to try to "win" an argument.

Sargon is a dumb faggot who will say just about anything for clout, but in mostly everything he does and says he is a liberal. He even started a political party called the liberalist. By the way, you've yet to prove to me that Sargon is right-wing. A citation would be nice. ^-^

As for Shapiro; he sure puts on a good show, but he's a Rino. He is what's called controlled opposition.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo