💼 Careercow Donald J Trump - 45th/47th President of the USA, convicted felon, Epstein bro, Putin/Netanyahu simp, serial liar, sore loser, cheat and the Chris-Chan of Presidents. Lost a war to Iran and algae. THIS IS NOT USPG2.

[Kether]

All he had to do was to stay inoffensive enough to not actively lose

and he torpedoed that with "build that wall" he was always going to have the democrats throwing him in prison after the "....some i assume are good people" quote.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

2013 pol talking points are mainstream now. Shane Gillis, Mr. Football himself, talks like 2013 /pol/ on his podcast. 'BLACK PEOPLE ARE WHY I CAN'T GO TO THE GAS STATION ANYMORE!' & 'LEAVE THE SCIENCE TO WHITE PEOPLE, ASIANS SMELL REE!' and they allow this fucker to be the biggest comedian in the country and shove him in your face every weekend of the last third of the year.

I love unleashing this for the normalfags. Leftists accusing centrists of being nazis and rightroids whining about leftists being mean on the internet have no idea how degenerate this part of the internet can get.

 

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

Ver archivo adjunto 8319643

Lmao, at least they're not going full retard and building an actual battleship. It's just a large destroyer, probably only slightly bigger than a Type 055 or Maya class.

Hello, yes, polymarket? I’d like to buy $900,000 in futures contracts that there will not be a Trump class warship.

 

[BlackDragoons]

Ver archivo adjunto 8319643

Lmao, at least they're not going full retard and building an actual battleship. It's just a large destroyer, probably only slightly bigger than a Type 055 or Maya class.

OFC it has his name slapped on it.

This guy can't go five fucking seconds without slapping his name on something.

 

[Wall of Bricks]

OFC it has his name slapped on it.

This guy can't go five fucking seconds without slapping his name on something.

One of the drawings shows his picture on the back of the ship. Imagine being on an enemy warship and seeing that stupid crap on the backside of that ship. I don't think anyone would take it seriously. Not even North Korea puts pictures of their leader on the actual ship itself.

The Trump cult of personality is going to exceed the levels employed by the Kim dynasty of North Korea.

 

[Raven Mocker]

and he torpedoed that with "build that wall" he was always going to have the democrats throwing him in prison after the "....some i assume are good people" quote.

Trump wasn't going to be winning any Democrats over no matter what he said. By 2015, things were already incredibly polarized following the unpopular administrations of both Bush and Obama, which generated large but essentially leaderless bases of opposition against both main parties within the constituency of the other. He had to avoid offending  Republicans, which is a lot easier.

Outside of unrealistic and extreme hypotheticals, like declaring genocide to be a campaign plank or saying he intended to reinstate chattel slavery, pretty much the only thing he had to avoid was saying that he supported overturning Roe v. Wade. Everybody with any common sense knew it was a likely outcome of a Republican victory given the constituents and demographics of the SCOTUS, but moderates on the Republican-leaning side weren't going to be thinking about it unless it became the main topic of discussion. That's kind of how voters make a lot of decisions. They only think about hotbutton topics, and how those are framed can affect public opinion a lot more than it should (Obamacare - actually a carefully workshopped term rather than an organic development - had a lot fewer supporters than the Affordable Care Act in polls taken during the early-2010s, despite the two being the same exact thing). Had Trump talked about a nationwide abortion ban, a topic he's still remarkably taciturn about, in some dumbass attempt to appeal to Evangelicals who vote for anyone with an R by their name regardless, he might have genuinely lost enough swing states in 2016 (hell, even 2024) to lose the election as a whole.

Short of that, though, any Republican was going to win. Obama's approval rating was abysmal, regardless of who was to blame for a lot of his perceived failures. He had no clout left to prop up a successor near the end. Trump could make as many wild promises as he wanted about building a wall and making Mexico pay for it, as long as he didn't let the Right-leaning Centrists, who understood that he was full of shit, get genuinely spooked. As long as he could steer the conversation, something he was still very good at in the middle of the last decade, he had nothing to worry about.

 

[Kether]

Trump wasn't going to be winning any Democrats over no matter what he said. By 2015, things were already incredibly polarized following the unpopularity administrations of both Bush and Obama, which generated large but essentially leaderless bases of opposition against both main parties within the constituency of the other. He had to avoid offending  Republicans, which is a lot easier.

but according to the 2012 RNC autopsy the smart move for the GOP would be to pander as hard to democrats as possible. So why would it say that if everyone knew the voting public was too polarized for that to work? it was the game plan when mccain and romney both ran

Everybody with any common sense knew it was a likely outcome of a Republican victory given the constituents and demographics of the SCOTUS,

the open secret is that before the leak, Roberts was going to pull another Obamacare style "meaningless overturn" on Roe V Wade and the leak torpedoed any ability to do that.

Short of that, though, any Republican was going to win. Obama's approval rating was abysmal, regardless of who was to blame for a lot of his perceived failures. He had no clout left to prop up a successor near the end.

every poll shows all of that to be insane hindsight. You might as well say Charlie Kirk's death was a conspiracy because why else wouldn't they have put a security guard up there to catch the guy on the roof. Its like saying the generals were stupid not to use their smartphones during ww2. every poll showed it would be a long shot from trump to win. it wasn't a given.

as long as he didn't let the Right-leaning Centrists

look how much chaos the immigration issue is causing in the current year, the wall already spooked a lot of right-leaning centrists, both democrats and repubicans have admitted it in "tell-alls" and behind the scenes reports. by all accounts Trump was saying the sort of extremist language that the GOP refrained from using under the "liberal republican" era the Bushes brought forth

 

[OG Swolemaster]

Ver archivo adjunto 8319643

Lmao, at least they're not going full retard and building an actual battleship. It's just a large destroyer, probably only slightly bigger than a Type 055 or Maya class.

I take this back, apparently its planned to be over 30,000 tons, insane and retarded.

Hello, yes, polymarket? I’d like to buy $900,000 in futures contracts that there will not be a Trump class warship.

Good bet.

 

[The Hardest R]

Trump Class: an oxymoron if I ever saw one, especially the “moron” part

 

[BlackDragoons]

One of the drawings shows his picture on the back of the ship. Imagine being on an enemy warship and seeing that stupid crap on the backside of that ship. I don't think anyone would take it seriously. Not even North Korea puts pictures of their leader on the actual ship itself.

The Trump cult of personality is going to exceed the levels employed by the Kim dynasty of North Korea.
Ver archivo adjunto 8319862

OH i didn't know it has a picture of him on the backside.

This is just painting a massive bullseye. Who thought this was a good idea? Oh wait probably Trump.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Trump Class: an oxymoron if I ever saw one, especially the “moron” part

DJT is raw, unfiltered small dick energy.

 

[Raven Mocker]

but according to the 2012 RNC autopsy the smart move for the GOP would be to pander as hard to democrats as possible. So why would it say that if everyone knew the voting public was too polarized for that to work? it was the game plan when mccain and romney both ran

It was the game plan when both McCain and Romney ran. Both McCain and Romney lost.

In 2008, McCain might have stood a chance without the Iraq War being involved. Not that he even really supported it, but the GOP's approval was dead in the water. By 2012, the Overton Window for both parties had shifted so far that there was no winning over Democratic-leaning Centrists without alienating the GOP base of support. Gay marriage and the ACA, which was based on a plan very similar to one that Romney had signed off on, were the main topics of debate at that point, and Romney couldn't give ground on either whatever his personal feelings might have been. Winning over Democrats just wasn't going to happen, and trying to pull it off just backfired.

every poll shows all of that to be insane hindsight...

Every poll showed that the majority of people disliked Trump, not that they were actually going to vote against him. The only poll that matters is ultimately the one that ends up deciding the election. If people absolutely hate a candidate but don't feel motivated to vote by opposition alone, then that candidate will still become president. I agree, I didn't think he would win at the time either. I don't even think that he thought he had a chance, tbh. Post-election, though, it's pretty obvious that broader societal trends (which are well-documented) were responsible for his victory. Republican-leaning voters in swing states wanted him to win, while Centrists and Democratic-leaning voters really didn't want him to, but also disliked the idea of a third Democratic term under near-identical policies to those of the Obama administration. They just didn't vote.

This is definitely easier to say with the benefit of hindsight, though. I'll agree there.

look how much chaos the immigration issue is causing in the current year, the wall already spooked a lot of right-leaning centrists, both democrats and repubicans have admitted it in "tell-alls" and behind the scenes reports. by all accounts Trump was saying the sort of extremist language that the GOP refrained from using under the "liberal republican" era the Bushes brought forth

Lots of Republicans disliked his language and some disliked his policies, but very rarely to the extent that they actually turned those against him. There's a reason why these opinions mostly show up in either early primary interviews or tell-alls/retrospectives. At the time, few of them other than a minority of "Never-Trumpers" wanted to be seen as splitting the party once it became clear that the GOP core demographic who voted in primaries were going to go for him because they liked his rants.

 

[Dr.0]

That doesn’t mean no one will
Ver archivo adjunto 8316262

Oh my God, please tell me there's a source for this

 

[cuttysnark]

 

[Raven Mocker]

Ver archivo adjunto 8320246

This meme has "Flagship of the Emperor's Children" vibes.

Unfortunately, Trump's just planning to slap his face on the back of a regular destroyer.

 

[SBG]

The 60 minutes CECOT story saga took a goofy turn since the episode segment was temporarily uploaded to a Canadian TV service online, causing it to get spread online.

So if Bari ends up getting some revised version of the episode segment it'll be able to be compared to see how much if tries covering up what all Trump's administration tried doing.

Story is also revealing for how Bari had skipped a bunch of screenings of the segment as it was being completed, so is she just barely even working there? Was also deranged that the email she had shot off kept asking them why they weren't including interviews with people like Stephen Miller and Noem about whether they've been bothered about the stories of torture at CECOT, when that was something Noem made a point of getting selfies taken there to celebrate the abuse people got there.

She even got the administration's position on judicial review of these detainees wrong, acting like the administration wanted due process for these people when they had been adamant that they wanted no such thing and the Supreme Court even ruled they'd been trying to deny people due process.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/22/business/media/cbs-news-bari-weiss-60-minutes.html

“I held that story because it was not ready,” Ms. Weiss, who joined CBS News in October, told colleagues at the top of a 9 a.m. editorial call with the newsroom, according to a recording of her remarks. She said that while the testimony of the imprisoned men was “very powerful,” other news organizations had already reported their basic story.

“The public knows that Venezuelans have been subjected to horrific treatment in this prison,” Ms. Weiss said, adding that if “60 Minutes” wanted to feature the story, “we simply need to do more.”

That viewpoint found little sympathy within “60 Minutes.” The show’s staff and correspondents convened for a somber Monday afternoon meeting, where the correspondent Scott Pelley expressed frustration at Ms. Weiss’s handling of the situation and raised questions about her management style. He asked why she had weighed in at the last minute after not attending five screenings of the segment as it was being completed.

“It’s not a part-time job,” Mr. Pelley said, according to four people familiar with the discussion who requested anonymity to describe a private exchange.

The segment, reported by the correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, was first screened for CBS journalists on Dec. 12; Ms. Weiss did not attend that screening or four others over the next week, a person with direct knowledge of the screenings said. She watched a video of the segment on Thursday night and offered suggestions, which producers integrated into the script. By Friday afternoon, “60 Minutes” had given CBS management the green light to announce and promote the segment to viewers.

Then, around midnight at the end of Friday, less than 48 hours before the segment was set to air, Ms. Weiss weighed in again, this time with more substantial requests. She asked producers to add a last-minute interview with Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff — a relatively straightforward task for a print journalist who needs to only make a phone call, but a logistically difficult one in TV news, where a camera and lighting crew is often required.

“If we run the piece as is, we’d be doing our viewers a disservice,” Ms. Weiss wrote in her internal note, which “60 Minutes” producers viewed as a more critical assessment than the one she had offered earlier in the week.

“60 Minutes,” the country’s most popular news program, has a long history of autonomy, and this week is hardly the first time its staff has bristled at interference from CBS News leadership. The show takes pride in a deliberative process where segments are edited and re-edited for weeks — a different rhythm from the fast-paced web journalism that Ms. Weiss oversaw at The Free Press.

Frustration with Ms. Weiss spilled out at the show’s Monday staff meeting, the four people familiar with the conversation said.

Mr. Pelley said that if Ms. Weiss planned to be more involved with editing “60 Minutes” stories, she should attend the early screenings and communicate directly with correspondents. “She needs to take her job a little bit more seriously,” he said.

Tanya Simon, the “60 Minutes” executive producer, told her staff that she and Ms. Weiss “had a good working relationship” and that she did not want “to ascribe motive and place blame” for the weekend’s events. She told the staff that she stood “100 percent behind Sharyn and her story,” and she referred to the segment as “thoroughly reported.”

On the 9 a.m. call, Ms. Weiss said she wanted a newsroom “where we are able to have contentious disagreements about the thorniest editorial matters and do so with respect.”

Hours later, Ms. Alfonsi — who accused the network on Sunday night of pulling her segment for “political” reasons — raised those comments during the meeting with her “60 Minutes” colleagues. She said Ms. Weiss had not contacted her directly with her concerns.

“Disagreement requires discussion,” Ms. Alfonsi said.

The woman is far dumber and incompetent than I'd have possibly imagined. I used to just think she was a sick fuck that'd defend Israel killing kids, but now she's even looking a shade worse.

 

[JaneThough]

Ver archivo adjunto 8318815

Can’t even buy American with our tax dollars?

Ver archivo adjunto 8319388

It really does feel like Trump has a kind of animal sense that the reaper is coming, but because he’s Trump, every attempt at legacy-building looks very slapdash and designed to be quietly dismantled or forgotten the minute he’s gone. I don’t think these carriers are even meant to be finished before he croaks.

All this renaming and redesigning the White House is a waste of our money. Who does that much work on what’s essentially a short term rental?

One of the drawings shows his picture on the back of the ship. Imagine being on an enemy warship and seeing that stupid crap on the backside of that ship. I don't think anyone would take it seriously. Not even North Korea puts pictures of their leader on the actual ship itself.

The Trump cult of personality is going to exceed the levels employed by the Kim dynasty of North Korea.
Ver archivo adjunto 8319862

Hey, gives enemies a spot to aim for.

Oh my God, please tell me there's a source for this

There’s not I’m pretty sure it’s AI.

 

[AltisticRight]

More Epstein Files, the FBI had what effectively was an unlisted batch hidden in plain sight.

Trump Class: an oxymoron if I ever saw one, especially the “moron” part

So it's heavy, then.
Just like him, an obese heavy paedophile that lurks around the classroom (primary school).

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

The woman is far dumber and incompetent than I'd have possibly imagined.

It doesn't matter if her arguments are complete horseshit and her real motivation is to aid her master's efforts to purchase Warner Brothers by yanking content that would anger Trump. All that matters is that 99% of the 60 Minutes audience won't see it, at least not until after either Paramount or Netflix buys WB or the deal is farther along.

 

[Norman B. Normal]

The fucking bad guy in BTTF2 was modeled after him for Christ's sake.

that always screamed bullshit to me. the jews have always had it out for blond white dudes and Ted Turner was a much bigger name and target in the 1980s. Ted colorizing old hollywood films made him the Nick Fuentes of his day as far as the jews were concerned.

I'm old enough to remember all this, and you can trust me on this one. Trump first became a well-known figure outside New York City in 1987 when The Art of the Deal was published, and by 1989 he was quite well known and already considered kind of a parody of himself and of that kind of ostentatiously trashy wealth. Anyone at the time who saw 1985A Biff Tannen--the hair, the womanizing, the vulgar taste in furnishings, the cartoonishly evil affect--knew exactly who was being parodied.