💼 Careercow Donald J Trump - 45th/47th President of the USA, convicted felon, Epstein bro, Putin/Netanyahu simp, serial liar, sore loser, cheat and the Chris-Chan of Presidents. Lost a war to Iran and algae. THIS IS NOT USPG2.

Destacado
JaneThough dijo:
So if our president dies just weeks after meeting with Putin, are we gonna investigate that or are we already owned by Russia?
Presiona para expandir...
You know the answer to this one!

BlackDragoons dijo:
Maybe he got something from all that fake tan shit he sprays on everyday.
Presiona para expandir...
He’s been hosing that shit on every day since the early 80s. If anything it’s the secret elixir of health.

Justice Tony dijo:
I have absolutely no clue. I'm torn between it being a nothing burger or it being very big.
Presiona para expandir...

It’ll be bigly big. The biggest. Big men come up to me with tears in their eyes and say, Mr President Sir, it’s just too big, I can’t believe it.
 
Última edición:
trolol dijo:
Space Command
Presiona para expandir...
_adodtroon.webp
 
cockaine dijo:
Some people just die for way too long, to everyone's detriment.

See: Mitch McConnell
Presiona para expandir...
Fair but Mitch Connell hasn’t been epically trolled by the governor of California after spending time one on one with the world’s most prolific poisoners.
 
Última edición:
If Trump dies, and a tox screen shows poison, how quickly will the bought and paid for miggers like Tim Pool, Charlie Kirk, and Tucker Carlson jump to say it’s nbd the president of the USA died of poison after spending one on one time with Putin?

Or will they convince their moron followers it was someone on the left and bang the final nail in America’s coffin?
 
JaneThough dijo:
If Trump dies, and a tox screen shows poison, how quickly will the bought and paid for miggers like Tim Pool, Charlie Kirk, and Tucker Carlson jump to say it’s nbd the president of the USA died of poison after spending one on one time with Putin?

Or will they convince their moron followers it was someone on the left and bang the final nail in America’s coffin?
Presiona para expandir...
It will simultaneously be both, nbd and the left, probably Hillary.
 
For the people who might be wondering why some of us have hated Trump our whole lives or questioning why this thread exists, it's because of stories like this one. Screenshot is not mine, so I don't have the photo tweeted here.

He's been a known scumbag his entire life.

IMG_9597.webp
 
Accept Only Substitutes dijo:
For the people who might be wondering why some of us have hated Trump our whole lives or questioning why this thread exists, it's because of stories like this one. Screenshot is not mine, so I don't have the photo tweeted here.

He's been a known scumbag his entire life.

Ver archivo adjunto 7863339
Presiona para expandir...
It's time the White House evicted a stroke victim.

The dominos are starting to fall and the house of cards is starting to collapse. More and more federal courts are declaring his authoritarian actions illegal, more Democratic governors are growing backbones, two Republicans in Congress (so far) have announced they're not running for re-election, and one career Democratic Congressman declared he wasn't running for re-election because he thinks it's time to turn Congress over to a younger generation. It was one thing, in the beginning, to fight these battles one by one, but it has become a deluge, on top of THE EPSTEIN FILES!!

Oh, and now Putin, Xi and Modi have joined forces, with Kim being welcomed into the fold. Nice job, Donald, thinking you could out-big the Big Boys.
 
Última edición:
Accept Only Substitutes dijo:
For the people who might be wondering why some of us have hated Trump our whole lives or questioning why this thread exists, it's because of stories like this one. Screenshot is not mine, so I don't have the photo tweeted here.

He's been a known scumbag his entire life.

Ver archivo adjunto 7863339
Presiona para expandir...
I think of things like this:
IMG_6441.webp

Spoiler alert: that sick infant was his older brother’s grandson. His flesh and blood.

Doctor of Autism dijo:
It's been 40 minutes and nothing happened

Ver archivo adjunto 7863392
Presiona para expandir...
Watch for shit coming out the windows.
 
Another "activist bias judge" rules against Trump. Apparently it's illegal to create a police force with the president at its helm! Who knew? Oh wait, it's been illegal to use the military to do that since 1878. Good luck SCOTUS with saying it isn't enshrined in our nations history.


A federal judge has declared President Donald Trump’s use of military troops in Los Angeles illegal, barring the Pentagon from using National Guard members and Marines from performing police functions, like arrests and crowd control.

In a 52-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer warned that Trump appears intent on “creating a national police force with the President as its chief.”


Trump billed his deployment of troops to Los Angeles, starting in early June, as a way of bolstering immigration enforcement efforts amid protests in the city against the president’s deportation agenda. Though Trump has now withdrawn all but 300 of those troops, he is mulling sending troops to other major cities, such as Chicago. He has also deployed the National Guard in Washington, D.C., under a separate legal authority from the one he used in Los Angeles.

Breyer, a Clinton appointee based in San Francisco, concluded that Trump’s LA deployment — an operation overseen by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — violated a longstanding law meant to prevent domestic law enforcement by the military: the Posse Comitatus Act. His decision followed a four-day trial last month that included testimony from the Pentagon officials overseeing the troop deployment in Los Angeles.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 bars the military from enforcing domestic laws without explicit permission from Congress. But Breyer said that despite this restriction, the Pentagon “systematically used armed soldiers” to perform police functions. And he noted that Trump has expressed his desire to use similar tactics in other cities across the country.

Breyer’s ruling bars the Pentagon from “ordering, instructing, training, or using the National Guard currently deployed in California, and any military troops heretofore deployed in California” from “engaging in arrests, apprehensions, searches, seizures, security patrols, traffic control, crowd control, riot control, evidence collection, interrogation, or acting as informants,” without demonstrating they have permission from Congress.


Breyer put his ruling on hold until Sept. 12 to allow the Trump administration to appeal.

The ruling is a win for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who brought the lawsuit. But it could be short-lived.

An earlier decision from Breyer against Trump’s call-up of National Guard troops was quickly lifted by a federal appeals court. In that earlier decision, in June, Breyer had found that the deployment was unlawful because there was little sign that the situation in southern California met criteria Congress has specified for federalizing a state’s military forces, such as danger of a rebellion or difficulty in executing federal law.

The new ruling is based on a separate legal argument that the troops’ actions during the deployment have exceeded the bounds of what federal law permits.

WATCH: THE PLAYBOOK PODCAST​

The judge said a California National Guard contingent, known as Task Force 51, had clearly violated those limits by engaging in routine law enforcement actions under the orders of Pentagon leadership.

“The violations were not one-off acts by individual servicemembers but were rather the function of systematic and willful orders to troops to execute domestic law,” he wrote.


“Task Force 51 was expressly instructed that it could engage in certain law enforcement activities: setting up protective perimeters, traffic blockades, crowd control, and the like,” Breyer continued. “That instruction was incorrect. There is no exception to the Posse Comitatus Act for such conduct. … The record is replete with evidence that Task Force 51 executed domestic law in these prohibited ways.”

Breyer also reiterated his earlier conclusion that Trump’s claimed basis for deploying the troops in the first place was contrived.

“There was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law,” the judge wrote, adding, “This was intentional — Defendants instigated a months-long deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles for the purpose of establishing a military presence there and enforcing federal law.”

Breyer stressed that he was not ordering a withdrawal of the roughly 300 troops that remain in Los Angeles, but simply that they only perform functions authorized by federal law.

“Federal troops can continue to protect federal property in a manner consistent with the Posse Comitatus Act,” the judge wrote.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo