DOJ Wants to Suspend Certain Constitutional Rights - Can I get a Hitler check?

shutterstock_editorial_10553038k.jpg

US Attorney General William Barr participates in a news conference with Justice Department officials.

The Trump Department of Justice has asked Congress to craft legislation allowing chief judges to indefinitely hold people without trial and suspend other constitutionally-protected rights during coronavirus and other emergencies, according to a report by Politico’s Betsy Woodruff Swan.

While the asks from the Department of Justice will likely not come to fruition with a Democratically-controlled House of Representatives, they demonstrate how much this White House has a frightening disregard for rights enumerated in the Constitution.

The DOJ has requested Congress allow any chief judge of a district court to pause court proceedings “whenever the district court is fully or partially closed by virtue of any natural disaster, civil disobedience, or other emergency situation,” according to draft language obtained by Politico. This would be applicable to “any statutes or rules of procedure otherwise affecting pre-arrest, post-arrest, pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedures in criminal and juvenile proceedings and all civil processes and proceedings.” They justify this by saying currently judges can pause judicial proceedings in an emergency but that new legislation would allow them to apply it “in a consistent manner.”

But the Constitution grants citizens habeas corpus which gives arrestees the right to appear in front of a judge and ask to be released before trial. Enacting legislation like the DOJ wants would essentially suspend habeas corpus indefinitely until the emergency ended. Further, DOJ asked Congress to suspend the statute of limitations on criminal investigations and civil proceedings during the emergency until a year after it ended.

Norman L. Reimer, executive director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, told Politico the measure was “terrifying,” saying, “Not only would it be a violation of [habeas corpus], but it says ‘affecting pre-arrest.’ So that means you could be arrested and never brought before a judge until they decide that the emergency or the civil disobedience is over. I find it absolutely terrifying. Especially in a time of emergency, we should be very careful about granting new powers to the government.”

“That is something that should not happen in a democracy,” he added.

DOJ also asked Congress to amend the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to have defendants appear at a hearing via videoconference instead of in-person with the defendant’s consent, although in a draft obtained by Politico, the sections about requiring consent were crossed out. But it’s not just Americans’ rights the DOJ wants to violate. They also asked Congress to pass a law saying that immigrants who test positive for COVID-19 cannot qualify as asylum seekers.

As coronavirus spreads through the country, activists are calling on politicians in office to release prisoners and immigrants held in detention centers, both of which can be a hotbed of virus activity with so many people in close quarters and limited or non-existent supplies of soap, sanitizer, and protective equipment. Some states have already begun to do so. But with this, the Trump administration is taking steps to hold more people in prisons for an undetermined amount of time — showing their priority is not saving lives but giving themselves more power.


========================================================================
Adolf-Hitler-and-Donald-Trump.jpg

6496052e-1383-4c7a-b28b-28286277ced7.jpg


How long until Americans start taking rides in gas mobiles?

COMING TO AMERICA ON A STREET NEAR YOU :
 
Última edición:
The Constitution actually does allow for the suspension of habeas corpus, but specifically only in cases of rebellion or invasion. The Civil War was certainly either one, depending on how you view the Confederacy.

When they say "invasion" they mean a foreign power invading the United States, not the United States invading South Carolina.
 
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - for I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - for I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the J'ews, and I did not speak out - for I was not a J'ew.
Then everybody lived happily every after."

- Corrected version of poem from article
 
When they say "invasion" they mean a foreign power invading the United States, not the United States invading South Carolina.
Like I said, either the South was in rebellion, or the sovereign nation of the CSA was invading the Union, never mind why it was doing so. Its applicable just fine either way.
 
I am so confused,
If trump doesn't use his executive power to over reach in a time of crisis he isn't doing enough but if he does then he's basically hitler. Like I'm with you the wording for the law is off it should only mention the current strain of corona so it can't be abused but isn't this what needs to be done in a time of emergency.

I just want to know what will make people happy becuase right now it just seems that this is another excuse to screach orange man bad. If he does something that limits rights like limiting flight travel then he's racist and overeaching but because he didn't close down the border entirely he didn't do enough to fight corona and is a monster.

Pretty much this. I saw "enlightened" liberals saying that "Trump wouldn't be a dictator if he was using his powers for good instead of enriching himself." For four years these people screamed that giving him any power would be a disaster because he wouldn't give up the power. But the second he shows restraint and doesn't make a power grab, he is incompetent.

Apparently Trump needed to time this properly so that he wasn't a dictator but also was competent.
 
I think you misunderstand. The Union invaded the Confederacy, not the other way around.
Lol what I think is funny is that people ignore this despite the fact that after the war the Union basically admitted it grossly overstepped its boundaries and passed Posse Comitatus to ensure the federal government didn't wreck the entire country over a political dick-measuring contest again.
 
I went looking at the original POLITICO article they are basing this on.

"Documents reviewed by POLITICO detail the department’s requests to lawmakers on a host of topics, including the statute of limitations, asylum and the way court hearings are conducted. "

"A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on the documents."

"The DOJ requests — which are unlikely to make it through a Democratic-led House..."


So we can't see the documents they are talking about, and they aren't even official requests to the house yet. So it's just another fearmonger piece to get you clicking.
Hahaha, pretty funny. The commie faggot doesn't need to look into the sources, because he posts "real news" guise.
 
something something Fort Sumter was Federal Property
I think even confederate fanboys gotta admit that fort Sumter was a really stupid hill to both literally and figuratively die on. I think the CSA could have trumbled along just fine without it. Its existence as a state was not dependent on fort fucking Sumter.

The Union wanted a reason to put down the CSA and the CSA generously obliged. Not the smartest political instinct on display there.
 
Última edición:
Meanwhile, at the Legion of Doom, in various Dem fiefdoms across the country, Mayors and governors are taking great strides to seize power "purely for the greater good due to the covid-19 crisis" while talking out the other side of their mouths about this monstrous assault on liberty.

Let the virus take the shameless and the hypocrites or all stripes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo