does arab cultural influence make countries more rapey and violent?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
Xenia

Xenia

anus.
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
3 de Sep, 2025
Most muslim countries have rather barbaric rapey niggerlike populations except those where arab cultural influence was minimal:
-Indonesia and Malaysia (which is not even a fully secular state) are extremely peaceful by muslim country standards. They converted due to missionaries and didn't have the whole arab conquest thing.
-Kazakhstan and tatars from Russia also have very low levels of terrorist/rapey behavior and are culturally eastern european/nomadic asian with little arab influence
-Pakistan and Bangladesh are both muslim and jeet, yet former is way more violent than the latter.
-Turkey is basically south Europe culturally and their diaspora is far less criminal than middle easterners. It also dominated entire middle east for centuries kinda like a european colonial empire, which definitely has something to do with them being more european.
 
Yes

I could leave it at that, but that's against forum rules.

The religion is just barbaric and backwards.
Every country that is majority Islam has not contributed anything to the progress of mankind in centuries.
If you ethnically cleansed every Islamic country, the world would lose nothing of value.
 
Yes. Brownoids are inherently rapey. Melanin seems to have the effect of destroying all of the things in the frontal lobe that make normal people not want to rape.
I will say tho, all muslims, regardless of race, play defense for them, since islam is clear on the view that arabs are the gods chosen or whatever and the cucks follow this, so they are metaphorically holding the woman down for the arab to rape. So this idea that just because some group doesn't do the raping, that means they are innocent when it comes to it, is just false.
 
The angel of the Lord also said to her:
“You are now pregnant
and you will give birth to a son.
You shall name him Ishmael
for the Lord has heard of your misery.
He will be a wild donkey of a man;
his hand will be against everyone
and everyone’s hand against him,
and he will live in hostility
toward all his brothers.”

-Genesis 16: 11-12

Ishmael is seen as the ancestor of Arabs btw.
Skitarii dijo:
optimistic
Presiona para expandir...
The second one is true, prove otherwise.
 
"Arab cultural influence" is a result of their genetic, arabs are just flawed creatures with no redeeming qualities.

People are searching and searching for the causes of the complete shit that arabs are, in their culture, the area they originate from, Islam, whatever, they are all missing the forest for the trees.

Arabs are just shit from conception on.
 
Turks have historically been horrifically evil, but your points stands mostly, there is a never ending list of examples you could pull from, but heres one from the 1820's https://www.greecehighdefinition.co...greek-women-by-the-turks-which-shocked-europe. As far as I'm aware indonesian typically practiced a much more mild version of islam and only in recent years has there been radical islamic movements supported by places like saudi arabia. I would chock it up to them being a more peaceful people generally.
 
Yes, unironically and without even needing to get racist. In western countries, men are expected to control their lust and not rape females, regardless of how they're dressed. Raping someone in a crop top and push-up bra is still a crime. In Christian, or at least Christian-derivative countries (which is basically all of the western world in 2026), the onus of responsibility is placed upon the person performing the action, regardless of why they performed it.

Now consider the hijab/niqab, whose stated reason is to prevent temptations around lust from being developed in men, and understand that even if this is true, it has the effect of never exposing men to lustful temptation, so they can never learn to struggle against it. Muslim men are not expected to learn to control their emotions or resist temptation, and in fact it is the rape victim's fault for causing the lust in the first place, according to their moral system. It's fundamentally a feminine institution, evidenced by both its inability to regulate emotions as well as deflect from true accountability, and anyone who is not insane knows that God is the Father, not the Mother.

Everything that feminists claim about rape culture in the west is unironically true everywhere that muslim 'morality' is the dominant force. The muslim world is fucked up, always has been fucked up, and always will be fucked up as they refuse to legitimately determine guilt or innocence. They view the world in a fundamentally different way than we're used to, and their 'morals' should be resisted at every opportunity as soon as the avenue of infiltration is discovered.
 
-Turkey is basically south Europe culturally and their diaspora is far less criminal than middle easterners. It also dominated entire middle east for centuries kinda like a european colonial empire, which definitely has something to do with them being more european.
Presiona para expandir...
The way Erdogan rule Turkey now, we could wonder for how long it'll stay that way?
 
Super-Chevy454 dijo:
Yeah, both Erdogan and Franco was nationalists, however one difference was Erdogan was initially elected in a multiparty system while Franco was in power once he won the Spanish civil war.
Presiona para expandir...
The real difference is that Franco didn't fill his own country with ayrabs but Erdogan did. Turkey is way more cucked than entirety of Eastern Europe for this.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo