Can’t imagine any of those three will do much better. Any Disney fanatics will have already seen them on Disney+, and there’s not exactly any excitement about them because if somebody wanted to, they’ve already pirated them.
It's for parents. When my son was little , he had board books based on Frankenstein and Hound of the Baskervilles (basically just cutesy pictures with one word to a page). You put them on your baby registry because it's something you recognize, ther aart is sometimes fun, and you've already been given three copies of the very hungry caterpillar. You read them over and over, the kids starts teeth and begins chewing on them, and then eventually you move on to Curious George and RIchard Scarry.
Just the Guillermo Del Toro projects alone that Disney has passed on include -
I can see some people going to the theaters to watch these rereleases even if they're only in theaters for at least a week. It's worth remembering that Soul, Luca, and Turning Red were both dropped onto D+ in some countries due to Coof lockdowns if you buy Disney's reasoning behind the move.
Wanted to comment on this awhile ago, but it is just consumerism. Aliens isn’t the only adult property to get a children’s book. I go to Target and see new ones based on 2000s and prior sitcoms and movies a lot. It is honestly cringe as hell to the point where I have to ask who is buying these?
Even if the parents want to take their kids to the movies, they'll probably just see the new Illumination movie (Migration) since it's still not available on streaming.
I would've read the shit out of that book if it had existed when I was a kid.
Was it even announced it was getting re-released to begin with? People are only finding out about it while at the theater to see something else that they were planning on watching that day.
Was it even advertised? First time hearing about it.
it was....in the theaters themselves. I saw an ad for it last week before a special screening of The Iron Giant, and was planning to post about it.....But....well....Iron Giant, lol
so they advertised, in theaters, a re-release for the sole purpose of getting people into theatres. Were they expecting customers to spawn out of thin air?
I'd say he's a Heraclius, but in that case what's his equivalent to the Muslim bolt from the blue?
I'd assume they are just doing it as a "family night" thing. Theaters do show old kids' movies and family classics on certain nights. They're just trying to spin it as also a money-making endeavor so they can say they tried to the investors or something.
Only 20%? That's rookie numbers! You know there's a shit ton more transfat you can cleave off!
Then Kramer came sadly into the apartment and told Jerry "they hated my standup Jerry, all of them a bunch of thin skinned nig
LOL, LMAO even. And that one was the one with the most decent odds of anybody giving a shit, good luck with gay fish and tampon furry.
Sigh, good movie, they certainly don't make them like that one anymore... far from it.
Gee, maybe don't wait three years to put the movie in theaters then. The film itself is decent, I don't know why they balked at a theatrical run in the first place.
Man the character designs in Self look absolutely hideous. The main character just looks like the same ugly negress we've seen dozens of times already.
It's funny how you have more white cast in black films about how black people are a struggling minority than any other western film genre.
Babies have souls before they are born. Souls accidentally a pro-life animated movie.