Digg launches its new Reddit rival to the public - The site that Reddit came from and killed is back. Place your bets as to how long this lasts.

digg-communities-lightMode.webp
Sarah Perez
11:00 AM PST · January 14, 2026
The reboot of the early internet online community Digg, a one-time rival to Reddit, is moving forward. The company, which is today back under the ownership of its original founder, Kevin Rose, along with Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, is launching its open beta to the public on Wednesday.

Similar to Reddit, the new Digg offers a website and mobile app where you can browse feeds featuring posts from across a selection of its communities and join other communities that align with your interests. There, you can post, comment, and upvote (or “digg”) the site’s content.

Originally a Web 2.0-era news aggregation site, Digg was once valued at $175 million in 2008 but was ultimately outpaced by Reddit. That earlier version was split up in 2012, with its largest stake sold to the incubator Betaworks, while LinkedIn and The Washington Post picked up other pieces. This iteration of Digg drew additional investment in 2016 but was later sold to a digital advertising company in 2018.

Meanwhile, Reddit continued to grow as a community-focused site that has since gone public and is currently generating additional revenue from content licensing agreements with major players in AI, including Google and OpenAI.
digg-communities-2-darkMode.webp
However, the rise of AI has presented an opportunity to rebuild Digg, Rose and Ohanian believe, leading them to acquire Digg last March through a leveraged buyout by True Ventures, Ohanian’s firm Seven Seven Six, Rose and Ohanian themselves, and the venture firm S32. The company has not disclosed its funding.

They’re betting that AI can help to address some of the messiness and toxicity of today’s social media landscape. At the same time, social platforms will need a new set of tools to ensure they’re not taken over by AI bots posing as people.

“We obviously don’t want to force everyone down some kind of crazy KYC process,” said Rose in an interview with TechCrunch, referring to the “know your customer” verification process used by financial institutions to confirm someone’s identity.

Instead, he proposes that Digg should pick up “little signals of trust along the way and bundle them all together into something that’s meaningful.”
digg-communities-darkMode.webp
Instead of simply offering verification checkmarks to designate trust, Digg will try out new technologies, like using zero-knowledge proofs (cryptographic methods that verify information without revealing the underlying data) to verify the people using its platform. It could also do other things, like require that people who join a product-focused community verify they actually own or use the product being discussed there.

As an example, a community for Oura ring owners could verify that everyone who posts has proven they own one of the smart rings.

Plus, Rose suggests Digg could use signals acquired from mobile devices to help verify members — for instance, the app could identify when Digg users attended a meetup in the same location.

“I don’t think there’s going to be any one silver bullet here,” said Rose. “It’s just going to be us saying … here’s a platter of things that you can add together to create trust.”

Before today’s public beta launch, the site offered 21 more generalized communities like gaming, technology, and entertainment, and was open to 67,000 users on an invite-only basis. Now anyone will be able to join and start their own communities on nearly any topic, no matter how niche — a top request from beta testers. The community managers (i.e., moderators) for these individual forums will be able to set their own rules, and their moderation logs will be shared publicly, so members can see what decisions are being made.

The site has also been redesigned since its private beta, now offering a new sidebar where you can pin your favorite communities and a main feed optimized for visual elements.

At launch, communities will only have one manager, but that will change in time, as the company adds more features, including those to customize the look and feel and functionality of individual communities with integrations and other tools. For instance, a movie reviews community could include scores from Letterboxd.

“We kind of opted for … let’s just keep building this plane as we fly it,” explained Digg CEO Justin Mezzell. “That means that it’s going to be very lightweight, and we’re just going to be aggressively shipping every week and just giving them new features as we go,” he added.
digg-communities-2-lightMode.webp
The company also plans to listen to its community managers about what they need and build accordingly, and it has brought on some Reddit moderators as advisers. Although Reddit was built on the back of volunteer moderators, Digg aims to find a model that improves the moderator experience. Plans on this front haven’t been fleshed out yet, however, but Mezzell said it “has to be a conversation.”

“We need to figure out a way to make this an equitable experience for everybody who’s actually building Digg into what it needs to become,” he noted.

In addition, the team is considering shifting its AI-created podcast about the interesting stories surfacing on Digg into a human-hosted version, as users have been requesting.

Rose told TechCrunch that the current team is small, giving them “years of runway” to find product-market fit.

“The beautiful thing about this launch is we’re finally at the place with Digg where it’s just that the foundational stuff is done, and now we can really start having fun,” he said.

Note: The rollout should begin around 4 PM ET.
 
Sounds like reddit with extra hoops to jump through.
 
If diggers won’t be allowed to say nigger, there’s no point to this. Like BlueSky vs Twitter, it will just be blue Reddit but with more insane marxists.
 
Última edición:
The community managers (i.e., moderators) for these individual forums will be able to set their own rules, and their moderation logs will be shared publicly, so members can see what decisions are being made

This could work. Tranny jannies love to operate in the shadows. If they have to show their work, their takeover (because they always try to take over everything online they can) might not work.
 
Instead, he proposes that Digg should pick up “little signals of trust along the way and bundle them all together into something that’s meaningful.”
They're basically betting they can out-innovate against the botters and spammers. The same war nearly every platform either loses, or fights with restrictions and manpower that are very expensive. If your platform gets big enough that subverting it is profitable, you will be subverted, at least in part. Selling yourself as the non-subvertible platform is like claiming your boat is unsinkable.

"Yes, every other platform lost this war, but we will do it with AI!" I'm sure that will work out just great. :story:
 
Never forget "Digg Day" was one of the key events that turned reddit from what it once was, into what it is today. Digg and reddit were once rivals, with reddit being the more "edgy" of the two, then Digg did their stupid redesign in 2010 which sent all their users over to reddit instead.

I am convinced that none of these are legitimate investment opportunities but merely a way to publicly launder money by posting the inevitable losses.
BLOOM (musing to himself): Heh, heh, heh, amazing. It's absolutely amazing. But under the right circumstances, a developer could make more money with a flop than he could with a hit.

QUICK CUT TO BIALYSTOCK'S SLEEPING FACE.
HIS EYES POP OPEN.
CUT BACK TO BLOOM.

BLOOM: Yes. Yes. It's quite possible. If he were certain the site would fail, a man could make a fortune.
 
community managers (i.e., moderators) for these individual forums will be able to set their own rules
At launch, communities will only have one manager, but that will change in time
plans to listen to its community managers about what they need and build accordingly, and it has brought on some Reddit moderators as advisers
My first suggestion would be a blanket ban on any current pReddit moderator, but since they did the opposite, better at least put a cap on the number of "communities" any user can mod. Otherwise you'll have the same no-life troons spending 20 hours a day squatting on hundreds of communities and turning them into identical nagging HR departments.

Digg aims to find a model that improves the moderator experience
The moderators need to have a worse experience. That's the problem...pReddit let the lunatics run the asylum for their own purposes instead of in support of the site or users.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo