Devloping: Woman Investigating Human Trafficking Links to Clinton Foundation Dead - RIP Monica Petersen

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema RI 360
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/...igating-clinton-foundation-crimes-found-dead/

It has been reported on Reddit that Monica Petersen, working for the Human Trafficking Center, was in Haiti investigating possible human trafficking connections to the Clinton Foundation.



Peterson previously worked for the Colorado Human Trafficking Council’s Data & Research Task Force. Early in 2016, a friend shared her blog post which was critical of Hillary Clinton’s shady dealings in Haiti.

Carlos Slim’s net worth is more than $64.8 billion dollars. The richest man on earth is a Mexican telecom mogul, whose career’s “most interesting parts” are his links to businessmen “suspected of involvement in Mexico’s so-called ‘Cartel of the Southeast.” He is a Clinton associate and donor to the Clinton Foundation. In 2015, Carlos Slim became the largest shareholder in the New York Times. William Engdahl, an author and lecturer with a degree in politics from Princeton suggests in this revealing article that this may explain why we will not be reading about the “murky dealings” of The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation in Haiti from the New York Times; “formerly America’s most respected newspaper of record.” According to Haiti activist Ezili Dantò: “The Clintons have used governmental power to conduct their private business and called it ‘helping poor Haitians.’”

Hillary Clinton should get far more scrutiny for her scandalous conduct in Haiti; from rigging the March 2011 presidential election for her favored candidate Michel “Sweet Mickey” Martelly (supporter of the CIA created death squad FRAPH) to insuring that her brother Tony Rodham and “a company that barely exists.” got a “sweetheart gold mine concession in Haiti” that “royally cheated” the state of Haiti.

Screen-Shot-2016-11-17-at-2.22.35-PM.png


Close friends are starting to raise questions, because the family has been unable to get details about her death.
Screen-Shot-2016-11-17-at-2.15.06-PM.png


As we know, Hillary has ties to convicted sex offender and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. In addition, Hillary was involved in the NGO run by Laura Silsby, the former director of the The New Life Children’s Refuge. She was caught attempting to steal and smuggle 33 children from Haiti, most of whom weren’t even orphans at the time:

Hillary has a LONG history of interest in Ms. Silsby. Wikileak emails dating back till at least 2001 have been found in her archives discussing Laura’s NGO. Laura had claimed she planned to build an orphanage in the Dominican Republic, but authorities in the country said she never submitted an application for this purpose. They instead located to Haiti.

Sources:

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/10BUENOSAIRES166_a.html
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3465
Huma Abedin was constantly forwarding Hillary articles on this woman’s organization:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/2772

One of the first things Hillary did when she took over the scene in Haiti was to get Laura off the hook:

http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/King.pdf

And the attorney who represented Laura Silsby? A man who was himself convicted as a sex trafficker:

https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/...-legal-adviser-to-u-s-haiti-missionaries.html

Even more disturbing, we uncovered an email in Wikileaks where they are literally pricing how much it costs to transport children:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3741

Again, this was the same group that got busted by Haitian Authorities trying to Traffic kids.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Life_Children's_Refuge_case

They’re in the Clinton Emails:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3741

What was going on here? Reddit commenters are asking questions:

As golfrinserepeat opined, “Just another coincidental death that happens whenever anyone looks too close into Clinton’s dirty laundry.”

Another poster commented, “This is getting even spookier.”



Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/...n-foundation-crimes-found-dead/#ixzz4QOCLUK74
Presiona para expandir...
 
Presiona para expandir...
A blog post about human trafficking by the late Miss Petersen:

Root Causes and Contradictions of the Displaced Youth along the U.S./Mexico Border
by Monica Petersen, guest blogger

You won’t hear about it in sound bites of coverage on the evening news, but every American should understand these seven facts about the 63,000+ kids that “showed up in the backyard” and need their plight acknowledged.

  1. Illicit markets thrive where licit markets have been destroyed. Despite the façade of “free-trade” in Central America (or anywhere, for that matter), international trade is far from free flowing. Economic development policies between countries of the global North and South have favored Northern profits and the United States for decades. This has resulted in massive inequality of worldwide wealth and acute global poverty. Many Latin American economies attest to this. Where “free-trade” policies have collapsed the legal and formal markets of local economies, illicit and informal markets will fill the economic void as a necessity of human survival. Weapons, narcotics, endangered plants and wildlife, humans, and other illicitly traded commodities are advantageous to developing economies because regulated, domestic exports (such as auto parts, factory garments or agricultural crops) have been devalued to the point they are no longer competitive on the global market. Illicit markets are the natural comparative advantage for sustaining local livelihoods, and this is apparent in the homelands of border youth and children.
  1. Criminal gangs often establish the supply niches for these illicit markets. Some are highly organized and violent cartels but most are loosely based. Minors in Central American conflict zones are at a higher risk for various types of child trafficking. Youth and children trafficked for gang soldiering and/or drug mules are an increased concern in the present context. Returning minors at the border to their homelands subjects them to these risks of human trafficking. Individuals caught in repeated cycles of fleeing and trafficking are common when violence and poverty occur together, making repatriation to these regions an unsustainable solution.
  1. Hasty deportations of unaccompanied Central American minors violate international children’s rights.The United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of the Child outlines these child-specific rights and legal protections for anyone under the age of eighteen. Further, the current position of Congress and the Obama administration – to overhaul the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and deny fair trials that recognize refugee, asylee and trafficking victim statuses – is unacceptable for a nation claiming to lead the global fight against trafficking in persons.
  1. The international principle of non-refoulment is being disregarded by the United States government. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees defines “non-refoulment” as the obligation of states to allow territorial access to refugees and asylees seeking safety from life threatening risks in their countries of origin. Returning border youth to documented violence in Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador is another significant U.S. violation of international law. In the modern era, “forced” and “willing migration” are almost never clearly defined categories, but U.S. immigration policies typically insist upon the later. This undermines the human rights of fleeing children – who are still owed due legal process regardless of whether they are undocumented.
  1. The U.S. has a sixty-year history of provoking regional instability in Central America. The complexity of this has included crippling Cold War policies, CIA backed coups, civil wars instigated and funded by the U.S. government, and the infamously chaotic War on Drugs. Gangs have flourished as a result of the illicit market niches created by sixty years of political-economic strife, and present levels of violence in these countries are deeply rooted in this historic trauma. Still, the U.S. continues to ignore the realities Central American youth and children are faced with as a result of its aggravating (often illegal) involvement there.
  1. Research overwhelmingly shows increased border militarization is an ineffective, inhumane solution for stopping migrant flows everywhere in the world. The current solution to quell youth flooding the border is a request for emergency funds from Congress. The funding would provide badly needed health and human resources for fleeing Central American youth. However, more than half of the requested $3.7 billion will fund an impressive boost in U.S. border patrols, surveillance, expedited immigration courts and anti-immigration campaigns – all proven to be inadequate controls in the long term. Completely open borders would not be sustainable without addressing root causes either. Nevertheless, two billion dollars toward creating fair-trade markets and formal employment opportunities in Central America (rather than creating more U.S. border military jobs) would be more likely to have a lasting effect on stabilizing the region.
  1. “Border Children” is a one-dimensional label. Perhaps necessary for categorical references, it is critical to remember that each one of these migrant youth is an individual human being. They represent diverse identities, experiences, resistances and courage in their individual life journeys. Their futures need to be considered valuable to our world and they must be supported as whole people with equal human rights.
The United States has yet to develop an immigration strategy that will appropriately address the interdependent forces behind what is now a worldwide phenomenon – the largest, global displacement of human beings in all of history. That’s a big statement for U.S. leadership to continue neglecting. Awareness of the tremendous underpinnings of the current border crisis is a vital first step for the American public to take. Without citizen demands for policy reforms – of both a broken immigration system and flawed model of international development – it is unlikely the entrenched roots of Central American oppression will shift within U.S. bureaucracy. The youth at the border are merely one casualty of this.



*Monica Petersen graduated in 2014 with an MA in International Development from the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. She is currently a research intern at the Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking in Denver and a research assistant for The Human Trafficking Center at DU. This blog does not necessarily reflect the position of any other person(s) or organization(s), and is the author’s work alone.
Presiona para expandir...
 
melty dijo:
Wasn't there someone linked to the clintons who suicided themselves zipped inside a gym bag, or am I thinking of another corrupt politician?
Presiona para expandir...
No, you're correct. It was the Clinton's. He even locked himself inside it:

Police visited Williams's home during the afternoon of Monday 23 August 2010, as a "welfare check" after colleagues noted he had been out of contact for several days.[9] His decomposing naked remains were found in a red The North Face bag, padlocked from the outside, in the bath of the main bedroom's en-suite bathroom.[10][11] The police had gained entry into his top floor flat in Alderney Street, Pimlico at around 16:40.[12] His family believe that crucial DNA was interfered with and that fingerprints left at the scene were wiped off as part of a cover-up.[1] No fingerprints, palm-prints, footprints or traces of William's DNA were found on the rim of the bath, the bag zip or the bag padlock. The key to the padlock was inside the bag, underneath his body.[13]

Williams was buried at Ynys Wen cemetery in Valley, Anglesey, on 26 September 2010, following a private funeral service at Bethel Chapel in Holyhead attended by his family, friends, former colleagues in the intelligence services, and also by the head of SIS, Sir John Sawers.[14][15][16]
Presiona para expandir...
 
Not very surprising. The Clintons have a history with unusual deaths.

What is surprising is how they keep getting away with it.
 
She can join Vince Foster in heaven:

http://prorev.com/connex.htm

Idk why the Clintons kills so many people.

They did royally fuck up Haiti btw: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...cratic-party-dinesh-dsouza-clinton-foundation

The fact that the Clintons skim off the wretched of the earth, engage in human trafficking, and whore themselves out to the highest bidder means they are not progressives. Barely liberals even.

Keep in mind, Bill Clinton was more or less a pro-choice, pro gay rights Republican.

The Clintons are greedy selfish corporitist monsters. All the SJWS who backed Hillary have the reflective capacity of a goldfish
 
I have three big problems with the "Clinton's routinely kill anyone who crosses them" theory:

-Why are Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, the staff of Breitbart, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and many others somehow still alive?

-Why wasn't anyone on Trump's team bringing this up during the election? Surely if there was so much evidence for so many murders it would have easily guaranteed Trump the presidency on day one? Why wouldn't he be hammering her with this? Which leads to:

-How exactly do they get away with it? The Clinton's would have to have total control of the government, and the cooperation of the Republicans (the same Republicans that tried to have Bill impeached and took Hillary to task over Benghazi) for decades.
 
An Ounce of Vagina dijo:
I have three big problems with the "Clinton's routinely kill anyone who crosses them" theory:

-Why are Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, the staff of Breitbart, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and many others somehow still alive?

-Why wasn't anyone on Trump's team bringing this up during the election? Surely if there was so much evidence for so many murders it would have easily guaranteed Trump the presidency on day one? Why wouldn't he be hammering her with this? Which leads to:

-How exactly do they get away with it? The Clinton's would have to have total control of the government, and the cooperation of the Republicans (the same Republicans that tried to have Bill impeached and took Hillary to task over Benghazi) for decades.
Presiona para expandir...

For your first point, I think all those people have drawn too much media attention to themselves. The founder of Breitbart did die sudden and unexpectedly. Assange and Snowden are def future targets but not just by the Clinton, it's worth noting Hillary asked if they could drone strike Julian.

Because it's a bit far fetched and requires a lot of digging, which the people who were ecstatic about the emails were happy to do on their own accord.

They aren't omnipresent, and a lot of people that worked for them dislike them. However, while Bill was the governor of Arkansas, he bought/bribed people in key positions in the police department, judges, and the medical examiner. If you're bored and are entertained by this kind of thing, I think this documentary goes into dozens of murders that might have connections to this family:
 
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo