For the third time, that's not the hypocritical part. The hypocritical part is saying Phil is lazy and unoriginal, and then praising restreamers. The reason that is hypocritical is because restreaming is streaming the same content that someone elses produces, which is by definition, unoriginal.
Does that make sense, or do you want to repeat it a 4th time so that you get it?
most people in the world don't care about what a streamer does. Most people don't spend 100k posts analyzing every sigh that one person made.Most people don't spend literal months of their life analyzing what Phil does in his offtime. Most people aren't so petty to think that by watching Phil they are giving him money and fame. And most importantly, Most people aren't so stupid as to think that if you don't like a streamer, that automatically means you hate them.
I love the broccoli example you gave, because it just shows exactly what i suspected about the level of intelligence in this thread.
Yes, a lot of people don't like broccoli. Yet a lot of people eat it. They do so because it provides value to them. In this case broccoli provides nutritional value. In the phil case, it provides entertainment value. You say phil is not entertaining, yet you spend months of your life following everything he does and watching every stream. Doesn't matter if you watch restreamers, don't give me that crap. You are watching his stream. You think you're not a fan of Phil, but you watch him religiously. You follow his every move. You know more about him than I do. You know his phone number. You know how much he makes a month. You know how he spends his money. You know his wife's name. You probably know his address. You know his mannerisms. You know his way of speaking. You know the way he types.
I'd say you guys are probably the biggest fans of phil there are.
Imagine calling someone retard when you can't comprehend a basic fact: the dichotomy of the world isn't "Phil fans" and "Phil haters".