I mean, what is honestly the point of primaries if these people were going to vote for the party no matter what? It's just like with black people. I'm sure some black folks will be pissed that Biden isn't the nominee, but who cares if you're still automatically voting Democrat regardless?
This stunt only proves that the primaries are just a show anyway, which has been evident since 2016 at a minimum. What's crazy is that if they decide to go ahead and remove DNC primaries entirely and just independently nominate the presidential candidate (which I believe they should be able to do, since it technically means nothing), the Vote Blues will just insist that this makes the Dems better, because it protects them from rogue elements like Trump getting the nomination. The DNC will protect them and ensure that they only get a good candidate to vote for going forward.
Ver archivo adjunto 6218279
Patrick oinks that Biden will never drop out because only Nazis say he will.
Then he drops out and Patrick instantly supports Harris.
This man has no opinions of his own.
Vote Blue No Matter Whos do not use their brains. They are in a religious doomsday cult that believes only the Democrat party's annointed nominee can save them from genocide and mass poverty and world war. Because The Party is always right, if they suddenly change who they nominate, that change must also be correct. There can never be a bad nominee. Go back throughout history for as long as these people have existed. Every time it is the same. They will have criticisms about a candidate and then, if they're nominated, those criticisms will vanish. If you back them into a corner and confront them with proof of those past criticisms they'll say things like "Well I said my piece, now it's time for unity to stop the red."
That's Bush Sr., not W. Look, we must use Occam's Razor and explain it like it is: Liberalism was in full swing during W's tenure, most young people grew to dislike the religious right due to their fumbles during the 90s and 80s, and most of acamedia and MSM was already leaning very liberal. W had his problems and lackings, like all persons, but those were lackings which were magnified by an unfavorable enviroment and his inability to successfully fight back aganist such enviroment
I would personally argue that W was smarter and savvier than HW. HW got elected on the basis of Reagan's incredible popularity, giving incredible promises. HW then immediately and directly went back on his promises and got kicked out of office the next election. W, by contrast, controlled his voter base so well that even though he was already becoming hated by the time of his re-election bid he still made it two terms.
Also, as some political historians have pointed out: W was elected to be an economic president and became a war president. This means his qualifications didn't align with his ultimate duties. Despite that, they re-elected him to keep doing the thing he wasn't qualified for.
I don't support W at all, but the impression that he was some stupid hick who couldn't string two sentences together is just the effect of the MSM on a Republican president. MSM also tried the 'Trump is stupid' angle, they just didn't get much success with it so they pivoted to fascist.
