Science Definition of kilogram set to change - Fatties rejoice

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399

Scientists are set to change the way the kilogram is defined.

Currently, it is defined by the weight of a platinum-based ingot called "Le Grand K" which is locked away in a safe in Paris.

Researchers are expected to vote to get rid of it in favour of defining a kilogram in terms of an electric current.

The decision is to be made at the General Conference on Weights and Measures, in Paris.

But some scientists, such as Purdey Williams at the National Physical Laboratory, have mixed feelings about the change.

"I haven't been on this project for too long but I feel a weird attachment to the kilogram," he said.

"I think it is such an exciting thing and this is a really big moment. So I'm a little bit sad about (the change). But it is an important step forward and so the new system is going to work a lot better. So it is also a really exciting time. And I can't wait for it to happen."

Why kill off the kilogram?
Le Grand K has been at the forefront of the international system of measuring weights since 1889. There are also several close replicas.

But the master kilogram's days are numbered. Its weight has changed over the years because it has deteriorated. The kilogram, like the pope, is infallible, so other weights have to be adjusted accordingly.

In a world where accurate measurement is now critical in many areas, such as in drug development, nanotechnology and precision engineering, those responsible for maintaining the system plan to overturn Le Grand K's increasingly flawed rule.

How wrong is Le Grand K?
The fluctuation is about 50 parts in a billion, less than the weight of a single eyelash. But although it is tiny, the change can have important consequences. Coming in is an electrical measurement which Dr Stuart Davidson, head of mass spectrometry at NPL, says is more stable, more accurate and more egalitarian.

"We know from comparing the kilogram in Paris with all the copies of the kilogram that are all around the world that there are discrepancies between them and Le Grand K itself," he said.

"This is not acceptable from a scientific point of view. So even though Le Grand K is fit for purpose at the moment, it won't be in 100 years' time."

_104305644_kg_v4_640-nc.png

How does the new system work?
Electromagnets generate a force. Scrap yards use them on cranes to lift and move large metal objects, such as cars. The pull of the electromagnet, the force it exerts, is directly related to the amount of electrical current going through its coils. There is, therefore, a direct relationship between electricity and weight.

So, in principle, scientists can define a kilogram, or any other weight, in terms of the amount of electricity needed to counteract its force.

Here's the tricky part
There is a quantity that relates weight to electrical current, called Planck's constant - named after the German physicist Max Planck and denoted by the symbol h.

But h is an incredibly small number and, to measure it, the research scientist Dr Bryan Kibble built a super-accurate set of scales. The Kibble balance, as it has become known, has an electromagnet that pulls down on one side of the scales and a weight - say, a kilogram - on the other.

The electrical current going through the electromagnet is increased until the two sides are perfectly balanced.

By measuring the current running through the electromagnet to incredible precision, the researchers were able to calculate h to an accuracy of 0.000001%.

This breakthrough has paved the way for Le Grand K to be deposed by "Die Kleine h".

What are the advantages of the new system?
Every few decades, all the replica kilograms in the world have to be checked against Le Grand K. The new system, if it is adopted, will allow anyone with a Kibble balance to check their weights anytime and anywhere, according to NPL's Dr Ian Robinson.

"It feels really good to be at this point. I feel it is the right decision. Once we've done this it will be stable for the foreseeable future," he said.

Relax physics buffs, they're just updating how a kilogram is measured in the first place, the scientific community is no longer relying on a decaying lump of metal.
 
A lot of shit is measured weirdly. Like a second is technically the amount of time for minuscule amount of caesiusm to radiate away
I remember being specifically told that 1kg=1L of water, 1L= a cubic metre and a metre=the swing length of a pendulum made to very specific standards.

Guess I had very out of date text books at my school.
 
I remember being specifically told that 1kg=1L of water, 1L= a cubic metre and a metre=the swing length of a pendulum made to very specific standards.

Yes and no, these equivalences were how things were envisioned in the early stages of development, but they didn't work out as formal definitions. The kilogram was in fact meant to be the mass of a liter of water, but they ran into trouble because they couldn't adequately measure temperature (and therefore control density) at the time. The meter was meant to be the length of the one-second pendulum, but the length of the one-second pendulum depends on surface gravity, which is different in different places, and so on, and so forth.
 
Instrument calibration is a extremely anal science, so the fact the main worldwide reference weight has been degrading and losing precision is a huge concern.

The platinum weight was to try and keep the kilogram constant over a long period of time. This redefinition will not affect how it was previously used, as they will want it as close to the original reference as possible.

To compound the issue, the unit reference has to take gravity into consideration, as the kilogram is also used to define the mass of an object.
 
Yes and no, these equivalences were how things were envisioned in the early stages of development, but they didn't work out as formal definitions. The kilogram was in fact meant to be the mass of a liter of water, but they ran into trouble because they couldn't adequately measure temperature (and therefore control density) at the time. The meter was meant to be the length of the one-second pendulum, but the length of the one-second pendulum depends on surface gravity, which is different in different places, and so on, and so forth.

So the high-speed low-drag scientific (TM) system is really just bodged together from a bunch of arcane measurements that are cherry-picked for their compliance to standards created by a bunch of psychotic 18th-century French autists?
 
So the high-speed low-drag scientific (TM) system is really just bodged together from a bunch of arcane measurements that are cherry-picked for their compliance to standards

The system was designed to be bootstrapping. If you have a piece of string and a stone, you can build a simple Foucault's pendulum and measure the second. If you know how long a second is, you can build a one-second pendulum, so you know how long a meter is. If you know how long a meter is, you can build a cubic meter tub and fill it with water, which gives you the tonne and therefore the kilogram. Both of these steps also work in the respectively other direction. Any unit can be derived from any other unit or, in the case of the second, from no unit at all. In theory, this still works with the modern definitions, although it would obviously take a few extra steps now.

created by a bunch of psychotic 18th-century French autists?

Autism is one of the problems, incidentally, that the SI was meant to solve. In the time before the SI, every guild would have its own weights, measures, yardsticks, etc. A yard of brickwork was not necessarily the same length as a yard of cloth. A gallon of wine was not necessarily the same volume as a gallon of water. A sack of barley was not necessarily the same weight as a sack of sand. A mile could be as little as 800 paces in one city and as much as 10k in the next. (Autistic unit proliferation started in the mid-to-late middle ages, partly for legal reasons, i.e. actively promoted by regional governments. It was nasty by 1200 and absolutely batshit by 1500.)

The Imperial system too is the result of a number of standardization efforts, only the Imperial system was too little, too late.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo