Debate TES regulars about why the site's userbase had a political shift

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

why can’t one of those arms be loading Kurt Cobain mouthwash for you

Lmao can't even take a joke. So easily triggered.

You insulted his izzat, good sir.

 

[General Patton]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fbXSwt0Di-UIt would be like this.

I'm mildly disappointed it wasn't Ving Rhames.

This is legit though.

 

[TheJelqster]

justify trump raping girls

Do you have evidence other than hearsay from Epstein?

being friends with epstein and thats oddly allowed

Everyone was trying to be friends with Epstein at that time period, if you had an opportunity to make easy money with a wizard jew-man, would you take the risk? I'm asking from the perspective of a man who would like to fed-post about about Dorito Mussolini, but I don't want to get banned.

 

[General Patton]

would you take the risk?

No, I still wouldn't associate with a man who set up sex acts with pedos.

 

[TheJelqster]

No, I still wouldn't associate with a man who set up sex acts with pedos.

We're talking prior to 2006, when it seems obvious that Trump stopped speaking directly to him after that

 

[General Patton]

We're talking prior to 2006, when it seems obvious that Trump stopped speaking directly to him after that

They had to have known about it in the social circles, so still no.

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

They had to have known about it in the social circles, so still no.

"they had to"

says who? Mentally defective niggers like you don't count

 

[TheJelqster]

They had to have known about it in the social circles, so still no.

Can you actually make some sort of evidentiary argument of this claim? Because we can apply this argument to any level of association of Epstein and then make the argument that X must've known about Y's action, and then state no based on the prior premises

 

[General Patton]

Can you actually make some sort of evidentiary argument of this claim? Because we can apply this argument to any level of association of Epstein and then make the argument that X must've known about Y's action, and then state no based on the prior premises

There's a lot of open secrets, like Kevin Spacey which was known about in any acting circles for decades, and Weinstein being known about since at least the 90s. Of course we're not going to find documents or anything that would show this, so no, I don't think I'll find any actual printed documents or something besides the list, but come on, I find it hard to believe people who did regular business didn't hear rumors that Epstein was setting up rich people to rape teenagers.

So if I was some big time wealthy person in that social circle of anyone who did business with the man, I don't think people at least didn't hear things.

 

[Duke-Diggler]

Projection. Epstein Trutherism is just the liberal version of Pizzagate, and you're emotionally unable to give up a conspiracy theory you invested so much energy into.

I'm not the party who lied about going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm also not the party who is actively covering up the Epstein documents as we speak. You really need to look up the definition of projection.

Which emails show that Trump raped a child? If you're not lying, you have them ready at hand.

Another example of a bad faith argument. You straw man what I said. I said the emails show he was INVOLVED with epstein, including an email where Trump spent hours with Epstein's victim at Epstein's house. Link

Try again, faggot.

 

[General Patton]

I'm not the party who lied about going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm also not the party who is actively covering up the Epstein documents as we speak. You really need to look up the definition of projection.


Another example of a bad faith argument. You straw man what I said. I said the emails show he was INVOLVED with epstein, including an email where Trump spent hours with Epstein's victim at Epstein's house. Link

Try again, faggot.

They also do the same thing when it comes to the bragging he did about walking in on teenage girls getting undressed, so I don't expect anything at this point.

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

I'm not the party who lied about going to war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm also not the party who is actively covering up the Epstein documents as we speak. You really need to look up the definition of projection.


Another example of a bad faith argument. You straw man what I said. I said the emails show he was INVOLVED with epstein, including an email where Trump spent hours with Epstein's victim at Epstein's house. Link

Try again, faggot.

So.... show us those emails.

Come on now, I can't wait to laugh at your ass

 

[RichardMongler]

I remember back in the bush years where any criticism of the Iraq war will label you a "terrorist" or "against the troops" no matter how much bullshit lies they spew, from "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction", to "Saddam was behind 9/11" to "If we leave iraq now, they'll follow us home." We have to deal with several years worth of utter horseshit coming from the right wing warmongers about how the war in iraq and afghanistan is a "good idea", only for it to be an unmitigated disaster.

Excuse me?

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

Yes, we know. You keep telling us.

Kill yourself, you dumb ficking cunt. You don't get to say i support pedophillia because I don't agree with your retarded screed.

 

[TheJelqster]

There's a lot of open secrets, like Kevin Spacey which was known about in any acting circles for decades, and Weinstein being known about since at least the 90s. Of course we're not going to find documents or anything that would show this, so no, I don't think I'll find any actual printed documents or something besides the list, but come on, I find it hard to believe people who did regular business didn't hear rumors that Epstein was setting up rich people to rape teenagers.

Then what's the point of speculating on 'open secrets' if there isn't even a criteria of evidence that we can at least look at and gauge a pattern?

Think about about it like this: people have openly espoused and accused our Dear Feeder was grooming teenagers. Why did they accuse him? Well they have evidence of him talking to someone on the Blockland forums. We have more "evidence" of that being a 'open secret' than we have of Trump hearing things that Epstein might be doing something dastardly.

On top of that, if this was such an open secret, why was Epstein the talk of the town up until his initial arrest? You would think a journalist worth his salt would at least mention something about allegations, but nope: they all glaze Epstein like he's the Messiah of the finance world. The New York magazine is my favorite example: But beautiful women are only a part of it. Because here's the thing about Epstein: As
some collect butterflies, he collects beautiful minds. "I invest in people -- be it politics or
science. It's what I do," he has said to friends. And his latest prize addition is the former
president. In his eyes, Clinton as a species represents the highest evolutionary form of the
political animal. To be up close to him, as he was during the African journey, is akin to
seeing the rarest of beasts on a safari. As he put it to a friend upon his return from Africa,
"If you were a boxer at the downtown gymnasium at 14th Street and Mike Tyson walked
in, your face would have the same look as these foreign leaders had when Clinton entered
the room. He is the world's greatest politician."

The whole article is this glaze session, yet for some reason no journalist decided to look into any allegations beforehand? It doesn't really make sense.

But I guess that's why ockham's razor is a thing after all.

 

[Tablet County]

Point me to a narc mom or narc dad thread and I'll go right for the entertainment.

There's a certain non-practicing lawyer from Minnesota that might be of interest to you.

 

[ChampFantana]

If you really don't like the shift, I have the solution. There are websites such as reddit and bluesky that you can post on which are full of delusional out of touch retards just like you! Those darn rightoids can't bother you there and the mods will always be on your side. You can even cry and throw tantrums about Trump to your heart's content.

The thing to remember is, our leftoid zombies are the mongoloids who are too stupid for even a tard zoo like reddit to put up with.

Imagine the kind of inbred slobbering mutant you have to be to get kicked out of REDDIT.

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

The thing to remember is, our leftoid zombies are the mongoloids who are too stupid for even a tard zoo like reddit to put up with.

Imagine the kind of inbred slobbering mutant you have to be to get kicked out of REDDIT.

Alright now I think you are going too far with the criticism.

 

[BunchaBabyDucks]

Are the groceries cheaper yet?
How about that no tax on overtime?

 

[JaneThough]

Kill yourself, you dumb ficking cunt. Just because I love pedophiles doesn’t mean I’m not also a pedophile

lol calm down