Debate TES regulars about why the site's userbase had a political shift

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Destacado
deleuzeon dijo:
If this is you at a 3 out of 10 anger, that's pretty encouraging. Maybe we can get you up to like a 7. So, like I asked, do you think your anger problems have something to do with why you're so poor?
Presiona para expandir...
You didnt ask me that question, you asked that to general patton. Are you ok with our president favoring those people?
 
Duke-Diggler dijo:
You can deny all you want about Trump constantly going to epstein's plane, even after he claims to "cut ties with him", or the fact that Trump is known to creep on underage girls while hosting a teen modeling agency, the fact that Trump constantly tries to censor the epstein files, and the fact that trump is mentioned in the epstein emails WAY MORE times than clinton or any other """left winger""". It's not going to change the fact that you're supporting a criminal pedophile that is the Ethan Ralph of presidents.
Presiona para expandir...
ok what if we threw Trump in jail and then Vance became the president and then he could shoot commie AWFLs in their face and deport illegals and yank inferior countries around by their tariff collars? i would be okay with that. would that be an acceptable compromise?
 
Retrodogkiller dijo:
You didnt ask me that question, you asked that to general patton. Are you ok with our president favoring those people?
Presiona para expandir...
I didn't say that I asked you, I said that I asked. You're just so angry you can't seem to parse anything, and you're desperate for some kind of "gotcha."

As for your question, am I ok with our president favoring who, poor people? Is that what he's doing, in your opinion?

General Patton dijo:
The fact that this guy legit thinks anyone is bothered by this gotcha lameness is making me think they're autistic if they actually think this.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm just asking you questions here in mass debates. You seem to be having some kind of meltdown, as you can't engage with a single one of them.
 
deleuzeon dijo:
As for your question, am I ok with our president favoring who, poor people? Is that what he's doing, in your opinion?
Presiona para expandir...
Are you ok with the president favoring jews and Israel over his own country and people? Are you ok with him favoring niggers over whites? Lastly are you ok with him favoring jeets over white American workers?

I do not think he's favoring poor people.
 
Última edición:
Technically the debate questions should be about politics on either side, not about why people are poor or not. So tbh, they don't deserve the answers. And asking this in general is a waste of time.

At least stay on topic.
 
Retrodogkiller dijo:
Are you ok with the president favoring jews and Israel over his own country and people? Are you ok with him favoring niggers over whites? Lastly are you ok with him favoring jeets over white American workers?

I do not think he's favoring poor people.
Presiona para expandir...
You and I have some common ground on this one. I totally disagree with his support for the H1B shit and saying American workers are too retarded to work. I seriously dislike his obsequiousness with Israel. As for favoring niggers, I wouldn't quite agree with that, he was pretty much the first president to push back on DEI; maybe you have something else in mind though.
 
deleuzeon dijo:
As for favoring niggers, I wouldn't quite agree with that, he was pretty much the first president to push back on DEI; maybe you have something else in mind though.
Presiona para expandir...
I would argue his DEI pushback was to appease his base and spite the democrats more than anything else. His pardoning of Lil Wayne on the last day of his first term, over anyone involved in January 6, is what I'm mainly looking at.
 
1768422408994.png
>@Wax do you love Jeets, niggers and jews like our president?
 
Retrodogkiller dijo:
I would argue his DEI pushback was to appease his base and spite the democrats more than anything else. His pardoning of Lil Wayne on the last day of his first term, over anyone involved in January 6, is what I'm mainly looking at.
Presiona para expandir...
On the Wayne thing we agree. I really didn't like all the Kardashian pardons from the first term (by which I mean pardoning black celebrities who mostly actually did real crimes).

The Elon / DOGE episode was a pro-white move insofar as defunding USAID and the various DEI programs; we've been seeing institutions like universities have to scramble to hide their anti-white racism under other labels, use different measures to accomplish it. Never would have happened under President Kamala, not that I want to waste 20 posts in a "but what if" argument. I'm just saying it's better this way than that way.
 
Kether dijo:
ssj_ness was another big casualty of not being in line with Null and the rest of the forum. the forum keeps being more and more right wing because anyone that disagrees with the right wing is more likely to be banned and it leads to a downward spiral.
Presiona para expandir...
He was banned for justifying raping a girl, do you think that is okay to do?
 
deleuzeon dijo:
The Elon / DOGE episode was a pro-white move insofar as defunding USAID and the various DEI programs; we've been seeing institutions like universities have to scramble to hide their anti-white racism under other labels, use different measures to accomplish it. Never would have happened under President Kamala, not that I want to waste 20 posts in a "but what if" argument. I'm just saying it's better this way than that way.
Presiona para expandir...
Ah, this is where we would diverge into a discussion about disagreements on USAID and other things. Obviously Kamala wouldn't have gotten rid of DEI or USAID, that would be a stupid thing to disagree on. As you said it would devolve into a long discussion, where this thread isnt really the place to have that.
 
Destacado
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo