Perhaps, but the majority of abortions are elective, not because there's any valid medical purpose or such.
If abortion was so easily defensible its advocates could grapple with that fact instead of always solely arguing outliers.
and those that aren't elective? Are you going to condemn them too? How universal is your "pro-life?"
Why not just expect responsible behavior? There's no other circumstance under which you can end an innocent human life for convenience' sake.
and what do you mean by responsible human behaviour?
If we're talking about a married couple, how are they to be responsible? Not having sex at all? Dead bedroom, you know the ones that the guys on this site cry blue murder over?
Or can they at least get birth control, only, oops! There are advocates who want to deny those being available too! IDK if you are one of those but that is also an issue.
Or why not just stay unmarried? Only, oops! To do so means your a miserable cat lady who needs to be fixed.
Just can't win. And none of you see the hypocrisy at all. You want this life so much? Walk the bridge halfway.
If this form of life is so valuable, show it. Make sacrifices for this life. Otherwise you're not actually saving life, it's all just lip-service to make yourself feel good. Case in point:
And it's not like you can't just give the baby up for adoption, for free, no questions asked, bypassing the entire poverty excuse anyway.
you go adopt a kid then. Take several. At the very least go fund some child's life who needs it. Or don't you value the life at all? Is that all this zygote is worth to you? As a cudgel to make others feel bad and you good?
Not your decision to make, neither is it mine nor even the mother's, or anyone else's. Outside of the absolute worst case scenarios of incurable illnesses and birth defects this shouldn't even be a conversation.
You are right that it is not my or your decision to make. But it is the mother's over here, and the doctors. And yes it should be conversation. How else will anyone learn?