StraightShooter2
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 10 de Jul, 2020
So a thought on how to deal with the incel epidemic is to simply make identifying as an incel, on or off-line, a capital offense and allow the state to have incels executed en masse. Here are a few arguments in favor of this proposal:
1. Incels are evolutionarily defective and essentially surplus population. So if the state just removed all notions of human rights for incels, then we should have no qualms about executing them. It wouldn't be on the same level as killing a legally-recognized person, it would just be more akin to euthanizing stray cats and dogs for the good of society.
Some of the various indicators which incels are evolutionary defects are:
A. Incels have no goals or ambitions in life other than pleasing women, masturbating to pornography, and watching Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network shows (which usually merely amounts to simping out to their mothers or female superiors into financing their porn habits. Evolutionarily superior men and women have higher ideals and ambitions, and offer contributions to the sciences, arts, humanities, and so on.
B. Incels (aka "chads") and femcels (aka "stacies") are effectively the same and easy to identify, and both the incels who troll shity sites like 4chan, or the femcels who post Hillary and Bernie Sanders memes and Steven Universe porn on Tumblr are a perfect match for each other, but both deludedly think they only deserve the top 1% of most attractive men and women. Incels are such normies that their pathology is easy enough for almost anyone of any culture or background to instantly identify - further proving that evolution has hardwired us into being able to identify and weed them out due to the the risks they pose to the evolutionary development of any species.
C. Trying to use facts, logic, reason, reality, or any higher level of debate with the likes of incels, because they aren't even emotionally-evolved past the level of audience which Cartoon Network shows like Dexter's Laboratory and Ed, Edd, and Eddy are aimed for. Basically, they just resort to womanly "debate" tactics like shaming, throwing hissy fits, and seeking pity. Since debate rarely works on them (or their radical feminist, blue-haired lesbian equivalents - femcels), this is proof that curing or rehabilitating them is futile, and that simply removing them from the gene pool altogether is the best option.
2. Ancient, patriarchal cultures didn't tolerate the existence of incels and were much harder on them than softer, contemporary societies are. Ancient cultures in which polygamy was practiced were much more "socially Darwinist' when it came to marriage and procreation - they actively encouraged the "high status men" to marry or bear children with more of the women - while incels or "low-status men" were just relegated to slave labor, and often intentionally forbidden from reproducing.
(The Bible, for example, talks about ancient Kings and Queens owning eunuch slaves - who were essentially the same breed of low-status men who incels comprise today - society did everything it could to deny them reproductive rights while encouraging the top men to have multiple wives and concubines).
3. As has been well-documented, incels are more likely to promote sexual perversions and paraphilias such as pedophilia, incest, rape, and the like. There is also a huge crossover between incels and those who identify as members of the "trans" community online, further illustrating the types of mental illness and pathology which run rampant in such "communities".
---
Based on this, I think that simply having incels executed for identifying as such on or off-line, even if they've committed no other crimes, might be the most expedient way of dealing with them and cleansing them from the human gene pool. Thoughts?
1. Incels are evolutionarily defective and essentially surplus population. So if the state just removed all notions of human rights for incels, then we should have no qualms about executing them. It wouldn't be on the same level as killing a legally-recognized person, it would just be more akin to euthanizing stray cats and dogs for the good of society.
Some of the various indicators which incels are evolutionary defects are:
A. Incels have no goals or ambitions in life other than pleasing women, masturbating to pornography, and watching Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network shows (which usually merely amounts to simping out to their mothers or female superiors into financing their porn habits. Evolutionarily superior men and women have higher ideals and ambitions, and offer contributions to the sciences, arts, humanities, and so on.
B. Incels (aka "chads") and femcels (aka "stacies") are effectively the same and easy to identify, and both the incels who troll shity sites like 4chan, or the femcels who post Hillary and Bernie Sanders memes and Steven Universe porn on Tumblr are a perfect match for each other, but both deludedly think they only deserve the top 1% of most attractive men and women. Incels are such normies that their pathology is easy enough for almost anyone of any culture or background to instantly identify - further proving that evolution has hardwired us into being able to identify and weed them out due to the the risks they pose to the evolutionary development of any species.
C. Trying to use facts, logic, reason, reality, or any higher level of debate with the likes of incels, because they aren't even emotionally-evolved past the level of audience which Cartoon Network shows like Dexter's Laboratory and Ed, Edd, and Eddy are aimed for. Basically, they just resort to womanly "debate" tactics like shaming, throwing hissy fits, and seeking pity. Since debate rarely works on them (or their radical feminist, blue-haired lesbian equivalents - femcels), this is proof that curing or rehabilitating them is futile, and that simply removing them from the gene pool altogether is the best option.
2. Ancient, patriarchal cultures didn't tolerate the existence of incels and were much harder on them than softer, contemporary societies are. Ancient cultures in which polygamy was practiced were much more "socially Darwinist' when it came to marriage and procreation - they actively encouraged the "high status men" to marry or bear children with more of the women - while incels or "low-status men" were just relegated to slave labor, and often intentionally forbidden from reproducing.
(The Bible, for example, talks about ancient Kings and Queens owning eunuch slaves - who were essentially the same breed of low-status men who incels comprise today - society did everything it could to deny them reproductive rights while encouraging the top men to have multiple wives and concubines).
3. As has been well-documented, incels are more likely to promote sexual perversions and paraphilias such as pedophilia, incest, rape, and the like. There is also a huge crossover between incels and those who identify as members of the "trans" community online, further illustrating the types of mental illness and pathology which run rampant in such "communities".
---
Based on this, I think that simply having incels executed for identifying as such on or off-line, even if they've committed no other crimes, might be the most expedient way of dealing with them and cleansing them from the human gene pool. Thoughts?
R all the same. I personally think Incels should never be executed, we’d lose about 25 percent of the harvested lulz and keeping them alive to their dreams fall due to their hideous ineptitude and lack of emotional strength to swallow their pride and change themselves in order to get what they want. Leaving the m alive is more punishment.