Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JTZYqODo7o0And I hope we are all agreed on the concept that if this site goes up in flames, the only possible response is we burn down the entire rest of the Internet. Only the Samson Option is a proper response.
If this site goes down I'm burning off my fucking fingerprints and erasing every trace of my presence online that I can find. And I'll burn the internet down as much as I can before I get bored and move on.
Not sure how it looks in other browsers, but in Brave (on clearnet) these are the two error pages I've been getting.
The second one clearly is from inside KF because it's already attempting Tartarus. But I think the first one is also coming from KF servers? Because it mentions Kiwi Farms by name, and it has "KF green" on the reload button. The built-in browser error pages wouldn't look like that, at least none that I've ever seen. It certainly wouldn't have the friendly name of the website -- only a url, if even that.
Anyway, the point being that if both of these error pages are controlled by KF, then yes Josh should definitely advertise the Tor address on there to guide people.
Edit to add: in Brave, the error pages have the Tor link right up in the url bar. But based on the messages I'm seeing in this thread, I'm not sure if everyone notices it.
A liberal shithole has turned into a fiery hellscape and it's now everyone else's problem. Trannies, pedophiles, and animal abusers with industry access and disability checks are trying to StopKiwiFarms. France is getting raped at football.
It is 2026, and time is a flat circle.
negers tong mijn anus.
omgaan, zieden, verwijden.
Jesus Christ. $80 a month? That's insane. That's 'let's equip everyone with a nuke' levels of inexpensive, for what they can do with it.
It infuriates me how short sighted the PTB are being over this. They think they have control, but how much control do you have if you do not have them on a leash? And what happens if these tools fall into the hands of someone less interested in doing glownigger bidding and more interested in an agenda or an ideology?
Jesus Christ. $80 a month? That's insane. That's 'let's equip everyone with a nuke' levels of inexpensive, for what they can do with it.
It infuriates me how short sighted the PTB are being over this. They think they have control, but how much control do you have if you do not have them on a leash? And what happens if these tools fall into the hands of someone less interested in doing glownigger bidding and more interested in an agenda or an ideology?
Read up. There's a specific girl in charge cross country that king Charles himself will defend. It's not Elaine alone, but working with all these in a coordinated attack like sinseer tried.
Could you contact Botlord and pay him like $100/month to leave your site alone? Or are there many, many botlords with the scale to overwhelm upstream and paying protection to all of them would be too expensive (because when others finds out you’re paying protection they’ll also want you to pay protection)? Or does sending them any money at all become legally hazardous, even if it’s literally just protection money?
Could you contact Botlord and pay him like $100/month to leave your site alone? Or are there many, many botlords with the scale to overwhelm upstream and paying protection to all of them would be too expensive (because when others finds out you’re paying protection they’ll also want you to pay protection)? Or does sending them any money at all become legally hazardous, even if it’s literally just protection money?
I haven't read up on Elaine, and I don't know if her parents are involved in keeping their literal crack whore nepo baby happy, but $80 a month still seems like a lot for a crack whore. You could be spending that on more crack, for instance.
(I kid, and I know Null is implying she has (((connections))) that keep her from winding up on the streets)
Read up. There's a specific girl in charge cross country that king Charles himself will defend. It's not Elaine alone, but working with all these in a coordinated attack like sinseer tried.
Read up. There's a specific girl in charge cross country that king Charles himself will defend. It's not Elaine alone, but working with all these in a coordinated attack like sinseer tried.
Saw that, but it wasn't what I was getting at. It's the same reason people with brains don't approve of government backdoors into encryption. Once the door is there, you better hope to fuck someone doesn't find out about it. And even with ITAR, national security, etc... things always seem to get loose.
Maybe we'll get lucky and the bitch will O.D., but hope's not a plan.
Quick question, how does KiwiFlare factor into all of this? Is the traffic so big that even KiwiFlare can't handle it? Aside from the site getting blackholed, that is.
Quick question, how does KiwiFlare factor into all of this? Is the traffic so big that even KiwiFlare can't handle it? Aside from the site getting blackholed, that is.
There are two kinds of DDoS attacks: application and network. Application attacks can be mitigated by a web application firewall (WAF) like KiwiFlare. Network attacks require a packet scrubber. There is no such thing as a firewall that can stop a network attack. The attack breaks the service (and in our instance the entire network for the entire service provider) before it ever gets seen by a firewall. That's why any comment about "why not just block it" is retarded.
Cloudflare and other DDoS mitigation services work by having hundreds of gigabits (sometimes dozens of terabits) of network traffic available to them. This is how they have the pipes large enough to filter network attacks. This requires hundreds of thousands of dollars in hardware and tens of thousands of dollars of monthly commitments to ISPs.
