Don't be ridiculous. We already have Negative Wonder Woman for that.
Ver archivo adjunto 9223736
God Kekko Kamen references?
Happy july 4th.
Batman has killed people in almost every single movie that he has ever appeared in so that's false. Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises, Batman v. Superman, even in The Batman he almost certainly killed a bunch of people during the car chase sequence. Don't remember if he iced anyone in Batman & Robin or Justice League but he likely did. People barely kicked up a fuss over any of those. If you talk to the general audience, you might be really surprised as to how many people just assume that Batman killing people is business as usual.
Wonder Woman has 4 major movies to her name. I'm not sure if you remember but the 2009 movie wasn't very well received in terms of Diana's character. Snyder Cut also had people shitting on it for fucking over almost every single major character including Diana.
Not at all.
It's boring and makes Wonder Woman generic and barely distinguishable as her own unique thing. It is, in fact, a key reason for her "blandness".
Well, this nerd needs some "context." I'd say that, in your "favor," the Batman of Zack Snyder's universe has indeed demonstrated mass killings, considering that most of them were generic "Mooks"/"Crooks" who were more collateral damage than anything else.
The "no killing" rule itself wouldn't make Batman any less Batman; it all depends on the format. If it's film, he might end up killing the villain of the day to close the movie, which is more of a very special exception, and in some cases, the more "secondary" villains among the main ones end up dead or in Arkham.
The no killing rule exists in film too, even in the "Snyderverse" Batman, who hasn't been forbidden from being very brutal with criminals. Well, I'll do you another favor and tell you that his 2026 Supergirl movie kills the villain. That makes you feel "better," right?
I am not trying to be an asshole, or a contrarían with you, I think you have made some great points in the past, and I have agreed with you. I hope we can disagree in a respectful civil way.
That being said, You misunderstand me.
The point isn't "who has killed more" because then it becomes a who can find more deaths and create a scoreboard. And to be honest many of those examples you gave were just the director not thinking that far ahead, instead of the Director intending to have Batman kill recklessly.
The point is again, " Who the general public knowns as having a strict no kill" rule. That's Batman. Ask any random people in the street and that's what they will tell you. Some may even say Spiderman or Superman. Diana is not gonna be an answer.
It would be an uphill battle to convince people Diana is the Pacifist one.
And, I am sorry to say, but I am highly skeptical of the claim that normies think Batman kills. That's the one thing they all know about him, besides the Wayne's murder.
Not really because a warrior is just something you do whereas a personality is who you are. Xena ended up being liked just fine for example.
Being a warrior doesn't make you boring or bland by itself.
Limiting the general knowledge of Batman to the movies is crap. I'll respond with something, and that is that it's not only the movies that have maintained this rule (with obvious exceptions), but there are also animated representations of Batman where these specific rules are manifested. Of course, obviously in series for children you wouldn't have Batman killing, but the rule has been there since the comics when Batman got his first Robin.
I feel that some of her comics have created this mentally challenged image of Diana as "weak." It's more the fault of the "professional" writers who put more effort into Batman and Superman than Wonder Woman.
